题目内容

[听力原文]11-15One year Mary decided to spend a holiday in Italy. She didn’t speak much Italian, but wherever she went, she was lucky enough to find people who knew enough English to be able to understand what she wanted, until one day she decided to have lunch in a small restaurant in a village in Italy. She has seen some nice mushrooms in the market of another village near there and thought they would taste very good. So when the waiter came to take the order, she asked whether she could have some mushrooms for her meal. But she had great difficulty in explaining to him, because she didn’t know the Italian word for mushrooms. At last she took out a pencil and drew a picture of a mushroom. The waiter’s face brightened at once, and he hurried to the kitchen. A minute later, he returned carrying an umbrella. Where did Mary spend her holiday one year?Mary spent her holiday in()one year.

查看答案
更多问题

[听力原文]M: Would you like to have supper with me tonightW: Well, I don’t know. Would you mind if I let you know this afternoon Did the woman accept the man’s invitation()

A. Yes, she accepted his invitation.
B. No, but she will let him know this afternoon.
C. No, she declined the invitation.
D. No, she kept silent.

甲发现推摩托车的乙形迹可疑,怀疑摩托车是乙盗窃得来的赃物。当乙发动摩托车想骑走时,甲走过去装着认识这辆车的样子,对乙说:“你要到哪里去”乙见状,以为甲是摩托车的主人,弃车而逃。后甲见四周无人,想将摩托车骑回家据为已有。刚骑一会儿,被前来查寻的失主抓获归案。 [问] 对甲的行为应当如何论处

王某与张某育有二子,长子王甲,次子王乙。王甲娶妻李某,并于1995年生有一子王小甲。王甲于1999年5月遇车祸身亡。王某于2000年10月病故,留有与张某婚后修建的面积相同的房屋6间。王某过世后张某随儿媳李某生活,该6间房屋暂时由次子王乙使用。 2000年11月,王乙与曹某签订售房协议,以12万元的价格将该6间房屋卖给曹某。张某和李某知悉后表示异议,后因王乙答应取得售房款后在所有继承人间合理分配,张某和李某方表示同意。王乙遂与曹某办理了过户登记手续,曹某当即支付购房款5万元,并答应6个月后付清余款。曹某取得房屋后,又与朱某签订房屋转让协议,约定以15万元的价格将房屋卖给朱某。在双方正式办理过户登记及付款前,曹某又与钱某签订了房屋转让协议,以18万元的价格将房屋卖给钱某,并办理了过户手续。 2001年5月,曹某应向王乙支付7万元的购房余款时,曹某因生意亏损,已无支付能力。但曹某有一笔可向赵某主张的到期货款5万元,因曹某与赵某系亲戚,曹某书面表示不再要求赵某支付该货款。另查明,曹某曾于2001年4月外出时遭遇车祸受伤,肇事司机孙某系曹某好友,曹某一直未向孙某提出车祸损害的赔偿请求。 问题: 如王乙要求以自己的名义代位请求孙某支付车祸致人损害的赔偿金,其主张能否得到支持为什么

Passage One Whenever I hear a weather report declaring it’s the hottest June 10 on record or whatever, I can’t take it too seriously, because "ever" really means "as long as the records go hack," which is only as far as the late 1800s. Scientists have other ways of measuring temperatures before that, though — not for individual dates, but they can tell the average temperature of a given year by such proxy measurements as growth marks in corals, deposits in ocean and lake sediments, and cores drilled into glacial ice. They can even use drawings of glaciers as there were hundreds of years ago compared with today. And in the most comprehensive compilation of such data to date, says a new report from the National Research Council, it looks pretty certain that the last few decades have been hotter than any comparable period in the last 400 years. That’s a blow to those who claim the current warm spell is just part of the natural up and down of average temperatures — a frequent assertion of the global-warming-doubters crowd. The report was triggered by doubts about past-climate claims made last year by climatologist Michael Mann, of the University of Virginia (he’s the creator of the "hockey stick" graph A1 Gore used in "An Inconvenient Truth" to dramatize the rise in carbon dioxide in recent years). Mann claimed that the recent warming was unprecedented in the past thousand years — that led Congress to order up an assessment by the prestigious Research Council. Their conclusion was that a thousand years was reasonable, but not overwhelmingly supported by the data. But the past 400 was — so resoundingly that it fully supports the claim that today’s temperatures are unnaturally warm, just as global warming theory has been predicting for a hundred years. And if there’s any doubt about whether these proxy measurements are really legitimate, the NRC scientists compared them with actual temperature data from the most recent century, when real thermometers were in widespread use. The match was more or less right on. In the past nearly two decades since TIME first put global warming on the cover, then, the argument against it has gone from "it isn’t happening" to "it’s happening, but it’s natural," to "it’s mostly natural" — and now, it seems, that assertion too is going to have to drop away. Indeed, Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, the New York Republican who chairs the House Science Committee and who asked for the report declared that it did nothing to support the notion of a controversy over global warming science — a controversy that opponents keep insisting is alive. Whether President Bush will finally take serious action to deal with the warming, however, is a much less settled question. What is "proxy measurement" in Paragraph 1 likely to refer to

A. Studying the characteristics of glaciers.
B. Measuring the growth signs of aquatic organism.
C. Taking advantage of previous pictures.
D. Using clues left from the past.

答案查题题库