题目内容
王某与张某育有二子，长子王甲，次子王乙。王甲娶妻李某，并于1995年生有一子王小甲。王甲于1999年5月遇车祸身亡。王某于2000年10月病故，留有与张某婚后修建的面积相同的房屋6间。王某过世后张某随儿媳李某生活，该6间房屋暂时由次子王乙使用。 2000年11月，王乙与曹某签订售房协议，以12万元的价格将该6间房屋卖给曹某。张某和李某知悉后表示异议，后因王乙答应取得售房款后在所有继承人间合理分配，张某和李某方表示同意。王乙遂与曹某办理了过户登记手续，曹某当即支付购房款5万元，并答应6个月后付清余款。曹某取得房屋后，又与朱某签订房屋转让协议，约定以15万元的价格将房屋卖给朱某。在双方正式办理过户登记及付款前，曹某又与钱某签订了房屋转让协议，以18万元的价格将房屋卖给钱某，并办理了过户手续。 2001年5月，曹某应向王乙支付7万元的购房余款时，曹某因生意亏损，已无支付能力。但曹某有一笔可向赵某主张的到期货款5万元，因曹某与赵某系亲戚，曹某书面表示不再要求赵某支付该货款。另查明，曹某曾于2001年4月外出时遭遇车祸受伤，肇事司机孙某系曹某好友，曹某一直未向孙某提出车祸损害的赔偿请求。 问题： 如王乙要求以自己的名义代位请求孙某支付车祸致人损害的赔偿金，其主张能否得到支持为什么
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Passage One Whenever I hear a weather report declaring it’s the hottest June 10 on record or whatever, I can’t take it too seriously, because "ever" really means "as long as the records go hack," which is only as far as the late 1800s. Scientists have other ways of measuring temperatures before that, though — not for individual dates, but they can tell the average temperature of a given year by such proxy measurements as growth marks in corals, deposits in ocean and lake sediments, and cores drilled into glacial ice. They can even use drawings of glaciers as there were hundreds of years ago compared with today. And in the most comprehensive compilation of such data to date, says a new report from the National Research Council, it looks pretty certain that the last few decades have been hotter than any comparable period in the last 400 years. That’s a blow to those who claim the current warm spell is just part of the natural up and down of average temperatures — a frequent assertion of the global-warming-doubters crowd. The report was triggered by doubts about past-climate claims made last year by climatologist Michael Mann, of the University of Virginia (he’s the creator of the "hockey stick" graph A1 Gore used in "An Inconvenient Truth" to dramatize the rise in carbon dioxide in recent years). Mann claimed that the recent warming was unprecedented in the past thousand years — that led Congress to order up an assessment by the prestigious Research Council. Their conclusion was that a thousand years was reasonable, but not overwhelmingly supported by the data. But the past 400 was — so resoundingly that it fully supports the claim that today’s temperatures are unnaturally warm, just as global warming theory has been predicting for a hundred years. And if there’s any doubt about whether these proxy measurements are really legitimate, the NRC scientists compared them with actual temperature data from the most recent century, when real thermometers were in widespread use. The match was more or less right on. In the past nearly two decades since TIME first put global warming on the cover, then, the argument against it has gone from "it isn’t happening" to "it’s happening, but it’s natural," to "it’s mostly natural" — and now, it seems, that assertion too is going to have to drop away. Indeed, Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, the New York Republican who chairs the House Science Committee and who asked for the report declared that it did nothing to support the notion of a controversy over global warming science — a controversy that opponents keep insisting is alive. Whether President Bush will finally take serious action to deal with the warming, however, is a much less settled question. What is "proxy measurement" in Paragraph 1 likely to refer to
甲公司与乙公司在某市吉庆三路合建了一栋10层的写字楼，双方签订了如下协议：“该写字楼属于甲、乙双方共同所有，但以甲的名义办理登记，第1—5层由甲使用，第6~10层由乙使用。任何一方不得将该楼抵押，否则该楼全部权益即转归另一方所有。”该楼前面有一学校丁，为提升写字楼价值，甲、乙公司与丁学校达成如下协议：丁在10年内不得在学校内兴建10层以上的建筑，甲、乙公司一次性支付100万作为补偿。协议签订后，双方到登记部门办理了地役权登记手续(以甲公司的名义)。后甲、乙公司分别将该写字楼租给5家公司作为办公场所，并签订了5年的租赁合同。两年后，甲公司因资金困难，向丙银行贷款3000万元，甲丙双方签订了抵押合同，约定以该写字楼作为抵押物，甲丙到登记机关办理相关的抵押登记手续。随后不久甲公司又与何某签订房屋买卖合同一份，将该房屋卖给何某(何某不知道甲乙公司之间的约定)，随后，何某领取了该房的产权证。何某准备将此楼房作为开办宾馆之用，要求5家公司一个月之内搬离。乙公司得知该情况后，将甲公司诉至法院。不久，甲到期无力偿还银行借款本息，丙要求对该写字楼行使抵押权，但遭到何某的拒绝。而此时，丁学校招生规模持续扩大，为改善教学条件，丁学校拟在校内建造一座15层的高楼。 [问题] 1．丙对该写字楼是否享有抵押权为什么 2．乙是否已经取得该楼的所有权为什么 3．本案中谁是地役权人为什么 4．甲公司转让该写字楼的行为是否有效为什么 5．假如甲公司与何某的买卖合同是合法有效的，何某能否取得该楼的所有权为什么 6．何某能否有权解除租赁合同为什么 7．何某是否有权禁止丁在校内建造一座15层的高楼
Passage One Whenever I hear a weather report declaring it’s the hottest June 10 on record or whatever, I can’t take it too seriously, because "ever" really means "as long as the records go hack," which is only as far as the late 1800s. Scientists have other ways of measuring temperatures before that, though — not for individual dates, but they can tell the average temperature of a given year by such proxy measurements as growth marks in corals, deposits in ocean and lake sediments, and cores drilled into glacial ice. They can even use drawings of glaciers as there were hundreds of years ago compared with today. And in the most comprehensive compilation of such data to date, says a new report from the National Research Council, it looks pretty certain that the last few decades have been hotter than any comparable period in the last 400 years. That’s a blow to those who claim the current warm spell is just part of the natural up and down of average temperatures — a frequent assertion of the global-warming-doubters crowd. The report was triggered by doubts about past-climate claims made last year by climatologist Michael Mann, of the University of Virginia (he’s the creator of the "hockey stick" graph A1 Gore used in "An Inconvenient Truth" to dramatize the rise in carbon dioxide in recent years). Mann claimed that the recent warming was unprecedented in the past thousand years — that led Congress to order up an assessment by the prestigious Research Council. Their conclusion was that a thousand years was reasonable, but not overwhelmingly supported by the data. But the past 400 was — so resoundingly that it fully supports the claim that today’s temperatures are unnaturally warm, just as global warming theory has been predicting for a hundred years. And if there’s any doubt about whether these proxy measurements are really legitimate, the NRC scientists compared them with actual temperature data from the most recent century, when real thermometers were in widespread use. The match was more or less right on. In the past nearly two decades since TIME first put global warming on the cover, then, the argument against it has gone from "it isn’t happening" to "it’s happening, but it’s natural," to "it’s mostly natural" — and now, it seems, that assertion too is going to have to drop away. Indeed, Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, the New York Republican who chairs the House Science Committee and who asked for the report declared that it did nothing to support the notion of a controversy over global warming science — a controversy that opponents keep insisting is alive. Whether President Bush will finally take serious action to deal with the warming, however, is a much less settled question. What does the report from NRC indicate
[听力原文]W: How are you getting on with your experimentM: In spite of my continuous failure, I have already made some progress. What can we learn about the man’s experiment（）
微信支付 
支付宝支付