Helen Smith:What better way to start off my senior year in high school than by reading something I am entirely familiar with I couldn’t have described this online revolution any better. The expansion of Facebook and its continuing success make me more interested in the world of computers and web design and the career choices they offer. Thanks, Mark Zuckerberg, for "poking" me into Facebook.Kevin Stuart:Rather than seeing Facebook as the hottest connection tool, I think it’s more like the latest way to make an already impersonal world even more impersonal. How sad that our society is so isolated that we need a computer to "connect" with others. No, thanks! I’m going to continue hanging out on the street corner, and hope someone builds a village square someday—now, there’s a radical idea!Robert Meyer:Isn’t it a contradiction that so many Americans criticize the government measures for national security purposes as an invasion of privacy when many of these same people feel free to lay bare their private lives to public exposure on Facebook Perhaps it reveals shallow minds or shallow lives. Or worse, does it reveal a lack of concern about the security of our country Sad indeed.James Brown:I eagerly returned from vacation so I could see my nieces who were home from college, only to find them with their "faces" in Facebook almost all day. They no longer communicate much with others face to face. No more hanging out at someone’s home. I wonder what effect this societal isolation will have on all of us. I hope this isn’t a trend, I remember all the fun face-to-face contact used to be.Laura Lee:I love email. I live and die by Google, but I will never understand the appeal of Facebook and its vast community of friends. In fact, I’m rather shocked. There are thousands out there who would like to be your friend and demand your time: they’re called books. Pick one up. Life is short. Save your few real friendships for coffee over at Starbucks or invest yourself in a local cause that will form meaningful, lifelong relationships.Now match the name of each person (61 to 65) to the appropriate statement.Note: there are two extra statements.StatementsA、Facebook has built up my confidence in my study.B、Facebook raises individual awareness of privacy protection.C、Facebook serves as an eve opener for my future work pursuit.D、Facebook worsens; instead of bettering, interpersonal relations.E、I miss the good old days when people met and talked to each other in person.F、Mind your own behavior online before you blame others for privacy interference.G、Don’t waste your time on Facebook when you can do something more significant. Laura Lee()
查看答案
案例一案情介绍(文中姓名都是化名)2003年3月17日晚,武汉青年孙志刚因为没有暂住证,被广州警方查出。在收容期间,救治站护工指使8名被收治人员对之两度轮番殴打致孙志刚死亡。后来法医鉴定,孙志刚系因背部遭受钝性暴力反复打击,造成大面积软组织损伤致创伤性休克死亡。涉案12名案犯已分别被判刑,20名公安系统、卫生系统、民政系统的相关人员也受到相应的处罚。但是此案引起了对收容遣送制度存在问题的广泛关注。案发后不久,三名法学博士以“中国公民”的名义,对收容制度提起违宪审查。5月14日,一份题目为“关于审查《城市流浪乞讨人员收容遣送办法》的建议书”,传真至全国人大常委会法制工作委员会:“全国人民代表大会常务委员会:《中华人民共和国立法法》第88条第2款规定,全国人大常委会有权撤销同宪法和法律相抵触的行政法规。第90条第2款规定,公民认为行政法规同宪法或法律相抵触的,可以向全国人大常委会书面提出进行审查的建议。建议人在落款处签名:中华人民共和国公民:俞江,华中科技大学法学院;腾彪,中国政法大学法学院;许志永,北京邮电大学文法学院。和一般的公民向人大常委会提出制定、修改法律的建议不同,这份公民建议书非同寻常之处在于,是公民依照《立法法》规定,向全国人大常委会提出对有关法规进行违宪审查的创举。可以说,这份薄薄的公民建议书,以民间形式启动了要求全国人大常委会行使违宪审查权的程序,罕有先例。2003年6月20日,国务院发布第381号令,《城市生活无着的流浪乞讨人员救助管理办法》自2003年8月1日起施行,1982年5月国务院发布的《城市流浪乞讨人员收容遣送办法》同时废止。新办法提出全新的自愿救助原则,取消了强制手段,违宪审查也自然终止。法律问题公民是否有权向全国人大常委会提出对有关法规进行违宪审查?
印象管理:人们试图管理和控制他人对自己所形成的印象的过程。通常,人们总是倾向于以一种与当前的社会情境或人际背景相吻合的形象来展示自己,以确保他人对自己做出愉快的评价。 根据上述定义,下列属于印象管理的是( )。
A. 某香港明星的经纪人想尽办法让明星多参与电视娱乐节目,以此提高人气
B. 董事长批评陈经理说,客户看到你们的办公室天天乱成这样,哪里会对公司有信心
C. 林某听到同学偷偷说自己的坏话就忍不住上去打了他
D. 面试前,小李在服饰、发型等方面都做了精心准备,以求一次成功
Amongst the most popular books written today are those which are usually classified as science fiction. Hundreds of titles are (1) every year and are read by all kinds of people. (2) , some of the most successful films of recent years have been (3) on science fiction stories.It is often thought that science fiction is a fairly new (4) in literature, but its ancestors can be (5) in books written hundreds of years ago. These books were often concerned (6) the presentation of some form of ideal society, a (7) which is still often found in modern stories.Most of the classics of science fiction, (8) , have been written within the last one hundred years. Books by writers such as Jules Verne and H. G. Wells, to (9) just two well-known authors, have been translated into many languages.Modern science fiction writers don’t write about men from Mars or space adventure stories. They are more interested in (10) the results of technical developments on society and the human mind; or in (11) future worlds which are a reflection of the world which we live in now. (12) this, their writing has obvious (13) implications.In an age where scientific fact frequently (14) science fiction, the writers may find it difficult to keep (15) scientific advances. Those who are (16) clear-sighted to see the way we are going, however, may provide a valuable (17) on how to deal with the problems which society will (18) face as it tries to (19) its new technology and come to terms with a continually (20) view of the world. 10()
A. analyzing
B. applying
C. following
D. forecasting
案例六案情介绍(文中姓名都是化名)2006年7月,游客王征等三人报名参加了海洋旅行社组织的张家界5日游散客团。根据合同约定,王征等人7月2日晚乘火车赴张家界,7月 6日中午乘K267次火车返程。结果就在7月5日,地接社导游告知王征,他们的旅游行程已结束,当天中午乘K267次火车返回。王等 3人无奈之下,只得提前返回。返回后,遂将旅行社投诉至当地旅游质监所,要求退还一天的导游服务费及相关费用。旅行社答复:游客王征等人是临出发前一天才到旅行社报的名,张家界、黄龙5日游的对外报价是1080元/人,王某当时要求不去黄龙,即给每人优惠100元,并说要马上签订合同,旅行社导游李艳就是私自将原行程上的“黄龙”去掉后,以原行程为模本与王签订了合同。之后,地接社将张家界4日游的行程表发了过来,旅行社这才发现签订的合同行程多了一天,这次事故纯属导游李艳的个人行为,旅行社不承担责任。据调查,当时旅游市场上推出的张家界常规行程中游览“黄龙”应比不游览“黄龙”多一天时间。当时旅行社将黄龙取掉后,应去掉一天的住宿。但旅行社导游未将这一天去掉才导致了这一失误。法律问题:你认为本案中旅行社是否承担责任?为什么?