Question 9To illustrate the false consensus effect, we presented some results from the "About You" survey in Think101. What did we find?
A. People who indicated that they have had something strange happen to them that science can't explain tended to think that the majority of their fellow thinkers would indicate that nothing strange has happened to them that science can't explain; and vice versa: people who indicated that nothing strange has happened to them that science can't explain tended to think that the majority of their fellow thinkers have had something strange happen to them that science can't explain.
B. People tended to believe that there are two sides to the story and that the truth must be somewhere in the middle.
C. People generally presumed nefarious intent behind the official position of the government or the pharmaceutical industry or scientists.
D. People who indicated that they have had something strange happen to them that science can't explain tended to estimate that the majority of their fellow thinkers would agree with them; and vice versa: people who indicated that nothing strange has happened to them that science can't explain estimated that the majority of their fellow thinkers would agree with them.
E. People rated themselves as better than their fellow thinkers in terms of their performance.
查看答案
Question 8In our discussion of "evidence-based evidence," when are we most vulnerable to being swayed to see, hear, or remember something that didn't happen?
A. When you are an expert in a particular domain.
B. When you are "blind" to the information you're examining.
C. When we are presented with high quality information.
D. When someone's livelihood is at stake.
E. When the information is noisy or ambiguous.
Question 7Which of the following would not be a way to minimise the expectancy effect?
A. Informing a jury about what to listen for when trying to make sense of a noisy emergency call.
B. Removing the name and identifying information from students' essays before grading them.
C. Not providing a DNA analyst with extraneous information about the crime.
D. Keeping the hypotheses of an experiment hidden from the person who is scoring the results.
E. Blinding a researcher to which participants belong to the control group or the test group.
Question 6When proponents of facilitated communication provide anecdotes on the effectiveness of the technique, and when critics of facilitated communication refer to the absence of evidence, it's tempting to remain passive and to believe that there are two sides to the story. What was the name we used to describe this heuristic?
Anti-establishment heuristic
B. Availability heuristic
C. Burden of proof heuristic
D. Confirmation heuristic
E. It must be in the middle heuristic
MEET RUDYMy cousin, Rudy, is a bit on the peculiar side. He has unusual tastes in movies and art, he is married to a performer, and he has tattoos on various parts of his body. In his spare time Rudy takes yoga classes and likes to collect 78 rpm records. An outgoing and rather boisterous person, he has been known to act on a dare on more than one occasion. What do you think Rudy’s occupation most likely is?我的侄子Rudy有很多奇特的地方。他对于电影和艺术有特殊的品味，他和一个表演家结婚了而且他在身体上的很多地方纹上了纹身。业余时间里他会去上瑜伽课而且他还喜欢收集78rpm记录。作为一个外向且非常吵闹的人，他以勇于挑战各种各样的情景而闻名。你认为Rudy的职业最可能是什么？
A. Farmer 农民
B. Librarian 图书馆管理员
C. Trapeze Artist 吊杆艺术家
D. Surgeon 外科医生
E. Lawyer 律师
微信支付 
支付宝支付