题目内容
某工程项目，建设单位(发包人)根据工程建设管理的需要，将该工程分成三个标段进行施工招标。分别由A、B、C三家公司承担施工任务。通过招标，建设单位将三个标段的施工监理任务委托给具有专业监理甲级资质的M监理公司一家承担。M监理公司确定了总监理工程师，成立了项目监理部。监理部下设综合办公室兼管档案，合同部兼管投资和进度，质监部兼管工地试验与检测等三个业务管理部门，设立A、B、C三个标段监理组，监理组设组长一人负责监理组监理工作，并配有相应数量的专业监理工程师及监理员。 在下面的监理资料中，哪些资料需要送地方城建档案馆保存 (1)施工合同和委托监理合同。 (2)勘察、设计文件。 (3)监理规划。 (4)监理实施细则。 (5)施工组织设计(方案)报审表。 (6)监理月报中的有关质量问题。 (7)监理日记。 (8)不合格项目通知。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
甲趁同租住房屋的乙不在房内之机，将乙的两张银行存折及其身份证窃走。甲知晓存折密码为乙均生口，于是，甲于次日取走其中一张存折内的所有存款人民币1 600元，后将两张存折放回原处，因乙片未发觉款项被盗，几天后甲再次将两张存折窃走，从另外一张存折内取走人民币3 000元，存折内尚余款项人民币1 000元未支取。因被盗存折均同时附有银行卡，银行卡在乙处保存。乙发现存折被盗后，遂持卡在柜员机上取走账户内所剩余人民币1 000元。对此，下列哪个说法是正确的( )
某医院决定投资一亿余元，兴建一幢现代化的住院综合楼。其中土建工程；采用公开招标的方式选定施工单位，但招标文件对省内的投标人与省外的投标人提出了不同的要求，也明确了投标保证金的数额。该院委托某建筑事务所为该项工程编制标底。2000年10月6日招标公告发出后，共有A、B、C、D、E、F 6家省内的建筑单位参加了投标。投标文件规定 2000年10月30日为提交投标文件的截止时间，2000年11月13日举行开标会，其中，E单位在2000年10月30日提交了投标文件，但2000年11月1日才提交投标保证金，F单位撤回投标文件。开标会由该省建设委员会主持。结果，某所编制的标底高达6200多万元，而其中A、B、C、D 4家投标单位的投标报价均在5200万元以下，与标底相差1000万余元，引起了投标人的异议。这4家投标单位向该省建设委员会投诉，称某建筑事务所擅自更改招标文件中的有关规定，多计、漏算多项材料价格。为此，该院请求省建设委员会对原标底进行复核。2001年1月28日，被指定进行标底复核的省建设工程造价总站(以下简称总站)拿出了复核报告，证明某建筑事务所在编制标底的过程中确实存在这4家投标单位所提出的问题，复核标底额与原标底额相差近1000万元。 由于上述问题久拖不决，导致中标书在开标3个月后一直未能发出。为了能早日开工该院在获得了省建设委员会的同意后，更改了中标金额和工程结算方式，确定某省某公司为中标单位。 E单位的投标文件应如何处理为什么
For the first time in decades, doctors have begun making major changes in the treatment of lung cancer, based on research proving that chemotherapy can significantly lengthen life for many patients for whom it was previously thought to be useless.The shift in care applies to about 50,000 people a year in the United States who have early cases of the most common form of the disease, non-small-cell lung cancer, and whose tumors are removed by surgery. (46) Many of these patients, who just a few years ago would have been treated with surgery alone, are now being given chemotherapy as well, just as it is routinely given after surgery for breast or colon (结肠)cancer. The new approach has brightened a picture that was often bleak."The benefit is at least as good, and maybe better than in the other cancers," said Dr. John Minna, a lung cancer expert and research director at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. He said new discoveries were helping to eliminate doctors’ "nihilistic" attitudes about chemotherapy for lung cancer."The standard of care has changed," said Dr. Christopher G. Azzoli, a lung cancer specialist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.(47) A major impetus for the change came a year ago, when two studies presented at a cancer conference showed marked increases in survival in patients who received adjuvant (辅助的)chemotherapy, meaning the drugs were given after surgery. In one study of 482 patients in Canada and the United States, led by Dr. Timothy Winton, a surgeon from the University of Alberta, 69 percent of patients who had surgery and chemotherapy were still alive five years later, as compared with 54 percent who had just surgery. The patients were given a combination of two drugs, cisplatin and vinorelbine, once a week for 16 weeks.In the world of lung cancer research, a survival difference of 15 percentage points is enormous. (48) Overall, the patients given chemotherapy lived 94 months, versus 73 months in those who had only surgery--also a huge difference in a field in which a treatment is hailed as a success if it gives patients even three or four extra months.A second study, also announced at the conference last year, had similar findings, and so did a third, presented just a month ago at the annual meeting of the same cancer group, the American Society of Clinical Oncology,At major medical centers, doctors quickly began to put the results into practice.(49) "The findings were so stunning from these studies a year ago that they began to change the standard of care," said Dr. Pasi Janne, a lung cancer specialist at the-Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. "Over the last year, the number of patients we’ve had referred here for adjuvant chemotherapy has gone up steadily."(50) But some doctors hesitated to make changes, Dr. Winton said, wanting first to see the studies published in a medical journal, which would mean the data had stood up to the scrutiny(仔细的检查) of editors and expert reviewers.Now, his study has become the first of the three to pass that test. It is being published today in The New England Journal of Medicine, along with an editorial by Dr. Katherine M. S. Pisters, a lung cancer specialist at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. "The findings were so stunning from these studies a year ago that they began to change the standard of care," said Dr. Pasi Janne, a lung cancer specialist at the-Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. "
甲系社会闲散人员。某日，甲以取东西为由，骗取女友(大学学生，当时在外地)同宿舍的同学乙的信任，跟随乙进入其宿舍。在未得到女友允许的情况下，将女友的笔记本电脑包拿走。包内有联宝牌笔记本电脑一台(价值人民币8 500元)，人民币1 000元及化妆品等物。后甲携电脑离开学校，并与女友断绝联系。下列哪个说法正确( )
微信支付 
支付宝支付