题目内容
Why is ______ fun. What delights may its practitioner expect as his reward. First is the sheer joy of making things. As the child delights in his mud pie, so the adult enjoys building things, especially things of his own design. Second is the pleasure of making things that are useful to other people. Third is the fascination of fashioning complex puzzle-like objects of interlocking moving parts and watching them work in subtle cycles, playing out the consequences of principles built in from the beginning. Fourth is the joy of always learning, which springs from the ______ nature of the task. In one way or another the problem is ever new, and its solver learns something: sometimes ______, sometimes theoretical, and sometimes both. Finally, there is the delight of working in such attractable medium. The ______, like the poet, works only slightly removed from pure thought-stuff. Few media of creation are so flexible, so easy to polish and rework, so readily capable of realizing grand conceptual structures. Yet the program ______, unlike the poet’s words, is real in the sense that it moves and works, producing visible outputs separate from the construct itself．It prints results, draws pictures, produces sounds, moves arms．Programming then is fun because it gratifies creative longings built deep within us and delights sensibilities we have in common with all men．
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
[说明] XX公司中标了某大型餐饮连锁企业集团的信息系统项目，该项目包含单店管理、物流系统和集团ERP等若干子项目。由XX公司的高级项目经理张工全面负责项目实施。张工认为此项目质量管理的关键在于系统地进行测试。 张工制定了详细的测试计划用来管理项目的质量。在项目实施过程中，他通过定期发给客户测试报告来证明项目质量是有保证的。可是客户总觉得有什么地方不对劲，对项目的质量还是没有信心。 张工应该如何实施项目的质量保证项目的质量控制与质量保证有哪些区别与联系
监控质量达标的直接责任由______承担。
以下______不属于矩阵组织的缺陷。
A few weeks ago, the Food Standards Agency (FSA. in the UK issued a report evaluating nutrient levels in organic versus non-organic foods like fruits, vegetables, meats, eggs, and dairy products. It is a complete, rigorous piece of research. And they found that, in terms of nutritional content, the differences between organic and non-organic foods are negligible. As the report states, "... organically and conventionally produced crops and livestock products are broadly comparable in their nutrient content." They did in fact find some nutritional differences between organic and non-organic foods, but concluded that it is "unlikely that these differences in nutrient content are relevant to consumer health." So here they have a nicely delimited (界定的) study of available research with rigorous standards and a fairly worded conclusion, all publicly available to download and read on the FSA website. The reaction, not surprisingly, was spectacular. The British tabloids alternately gloated (幸灾乐祸) with delight over the comeuppance(赢得的惩罚)of extravagant middle class shopping habits or frivolously attacked the study for insulting the people’s common sense. But it was the reaction of the Soil Association, the leading British organic certification organization, which highlighted just how difficult it can be for good science to be understood. The Soil Association’s response, published in papers across the land, entirely disregarded the intent of the study and instead argued that organic food is better for the environment and contains less pesticides than non- organic food. But in the very first paragraph of the report, the team states that they aren’t looking at the impact on the environment of organic agriculture or the effect of pesticide use, both of which the FSA has extensively examined in other research. They are specifically looking at nutritional comparison. The Soil Association further argued that the FSA report had ignored studies that showed any benefit of organic food. As Ben Goldacre incisively dissected on his popular blog, Bad Science, the Soil Association’s response was logically flawed and entirely beside the point. The FSA study is good science and by attacking, rather than endorsing it, the organic lobby in the UK has been plainly unscientific. It’s hardly the right stance for an organization that carries su.ch widespread support from the well-educated, critical-thinking middle classes who choose to eat organic food. Any of the many other reasons to go organic—whether it is to avoid pesticides, to encourage better livestock practices, or to simply eat better tasting food—are sufficient to continue supporting the efforts of organic farmers. By misrepresenting the science and its intent, the Soil Association has damaged its credibility and objectivity, the very attributes that its organic label—a stamp of approval—is intended to convey. The Soil Association’s asserted that the FSA’s report ______.
微信支付 
支付宝支付