题目内容

Question 8According to the Hartshorne and May study, how strong was the actual relationship between cheating in one circumstance (e.g., the number of times they ran around a track) and cheating in another (e.g., cheating at solving a puzzle) on a scale from 1 to 100?

A. 15
B. 30
C. 45
D. 60
E. 75

查看答案

搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈

更多问题

Question 7Hartshorne and May measured honesty among about 8,000 kids across a variety of tasks where they had the opportunity to cheat: solving puzzles, athletic tasks, arithmetic problems, grading their own papers, and so on. When asked about the strength of the relationship between cheating in one circumstance (e.g., the number of times they ran around a track) and cheating in another (e.g., cheating at solving a puzzle), how strong do people generally rate this relationship on a scale from 1 to 100?

A. 15
B. 30
C. 45
D. 60
E. 75

查看答案

Question 4In the parable of the Good Samaritan, a man was travelling from Jerusalem to Jericho, and was attacked by robbers and was lying half dead at the side of the road. A priest and a temple assistant each passed the man, but did not help. Finally, a Samaritan stopped to offer his assistance, and took the man to an inn, and took care of him. According to the results from Darley and Batson, why might the priest and temple assistant each pass the man without helping him?

A. They feared that robbers might be waiting to ambush them.
B. They didn't want to risk ritual impurity.
C. They believed the man on the ground was faking.
D. They thought that the man was beyond their ability to help.
E. They were in a hurry.

查看答案

Question 3We described the Good Samaritan experiment by Darley and Batson, the line length "social conformity" study by Solomon Asch, the electric shock "Perils of Obedience" study by Stanley Milgram, and the "Bystander Intervention" experiment by Latane and Darley. What do all of these experiments have in common?

A. They are all landmark demonstrations of the importance of situational influences on our inferences and decisions.
B. They all demonstrate that personality explanations are absolutely useless in predicting people's behaviour.
C. They are all clear demonstrations that humans are inherently unpredictable.
D. They demonstrate that people tend to attribute behavior in terms of personality or character traits.
E. They demonstrate that people are prone to making mistakes and have to rely on simplified models and heuristics in order to make sense of the world.

查看答案

Question 2Imagine someone said that Milgram's obedience experiments showed that people are slaves to authority. What specific name would Ross and Nisbett give to this type of interpretation?

A Channel Factor
B. The Fundamental Attribution Error
C. False Consensus
D. Cognitive Dissonance
E. The Fundamental Cognitive Error

查看答案

Question 8According to the Hartshorne and May study, how strong was the actual relationship between cheating in one circumstance (e.g., the number of times they ran around a track) and cheating in another (e.g., cheating at solving a puzzle) on a scale from 1 to 100?

A. 15 B. 30 C. 45 D. 60 E. 75

Question 2Imagine someone said that Milgram's obedience experiments showed that people are slaves to authority. What specific name would Ross and Nisbett give to this type of interpretation?

A. 15
B. 30
C. 45
D. 60
E. 75