题目内容
某施工企业通过投标获得了某住宅楼的施工任务，地下18层、地下3层，钢筋混凝土剪力墙结构；业主与施工单位、监理单位分别签订了施工合同、委托监理合同。施工单位(总包单位)将土方开挖、外墙涂料与防水工程分别分包给专业性公司，并签订了分包合同。 施工合同中说明：建筑面积23 420m2，工程工期450天，2003年8月1日开工，2004年11月25日竣工，工程造价3 165万元。 合同约定结算方法：合同价款调整范围为业主认定的工程量增减、设计变更和洽商；外墙涂料、防水工程的材料费，调整依据为本地区工程造价管理部门公布的价格调整文件。 在约定的风险范围内合同价款不再调整属于分包工程合同价款中的( )。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Management’s Global Agenda for the 1990s, According to GE’s Jack Welch what we call a "boundary less" company. Then we no longer have the time to climb over barriers between
Employee Selection Techniques That Are Too Good to Be True Selecting future employees is one of the most important and difficult processes for (21) human resource managers are responsible. The time-honored approach of interviewing, investigating an applicant’s experience and education, and talking with references, although time-consuming, may still be the best method. (22) interviewing today is a minefield of legal do’s and don’ts. You may ask an applicant about (23) convictions but not about arrests. You may ask about medical background but not about race and (24) And, (25) if you hire a person who then hurts a customer, you can be sued for not having known about his or her prior arrest record. Faced with such difficulties, many companies buy quick-and-easy solutions to the selection (26) Many of these solutions are, in fact, too good to be true. Take the 1980s, for example, Polygraph—lie detector-tests seemed at that time to be the wave of the future. Companies began relying on machines and polygraph experts to screen applicants. Disturbed by this trend and by the (27) of many of the best results, Congress severely restricted polygraph use. In the 1990s, equally questionable selection techniques are being offered as the human re source manager’s best friend. Some companies borrow a technique from country fairs and try to (28) applicants on the basis of their (29) Others turn to "honesty tests" which claim to be able to uncover applicants who would be problem employees. Some pencil-and-paper tests do provide (30) managers with useful information, but many tests now being marked simply do not live up to their claims.
建设单位与施工单位按照《建设工程施工合同(示范)文本》签订了施工承包合同。该工程包含两个子项工程，估计工程量甲项为4 000m3，乙项为2 000m3，合同单价甲项为220元/m3，乙项为560元/m3，工程预付款额度为合同价的12%，主要材料和构件所占比重为60%。同时，施工合同中规定：(1)设备由建设单位采购，施工单位安装； (2)建设单位原因导致的施工单位人员窝工，按18元/工日补偿，建设单位原因导致的施工单位设备闲置，按下表中所列标准补偿； 设备闲置补偿标准表机械名称台班单价（元/台班）补偿标准机械名称台班单价（元/台班）补偿标准大型起重机1060台班单价的60%自卸汽车（8 t）458台班单价的50%自卸汽车（5 t）318台班单价的40% (3)施工过程中发生的设计变更，其价款按建标[2003]206号文件的规定以工料单价法计价程序计价(以直接费为计算基础)，间接费费率为10%；利润率为5%，税率为3.41%。 该工程在施工过程中发生以下事件。 事件1：建设单位采购的设备没有按计划时间到场，施工受到影响，施工单位一台大型起重机、两台自卸汽车(载重5t、8t各1台)闲置5天，工人窝工86工日，工期延误5天。 事件2：某分项工程由于建设单位提出工程使用功能的调整，须进行设计变更。设计变更后，经确认直接工程费增加18 000元，措施费增加2 000元。 上述事件发生后，施工单位及时向建设单位造价工程师提出索赔要求。 根据事件1，承包商提出的人工费索赔为( )元。
Access字段名长度最多为 【6】 个字符。
微信支付 
支付宝支付