The biggest safety threat facing airlines today may not be a terrorist with a gun, but the man with the portable computer in business class. In the last 15 years, pilots have reported well over 100 incidents that could have been caused by electromagnetic interference. The source of this interference remains unconfirmed, but increasingly, experts are pointing the blame at portable electronic devices such as portable computers, radio and cassette players and mobile telephones. RTCA, an organization which advises the aviation (航空) industry, has recommended that all airlines ban(禁止)such devices from being used during "critical" stages of flight particularly take- off and landing. Some experts have gone further, calling for a total ban during all flights. (76) Currently, rules on using these devices are left up to individual airlines. And although some airlines prohibit passengers from using such equipment during take- off and landing, most are reluctant to enforce a total ban, given that many passengers want to work during flights. The difficulty is predicting how electromagnetic riel& might affect all aircraft’s computers. (77)Experts know that portable devices emit radiation which affects those wavelengths which aircraft use for navigation and communication. But, because they have not been able to reproduce these effects in a laboratory, they have no way of knowing whether the interference might be dangerous or not. The fact that aircraft may be vulnerable(易受损的)to interference raises the risk that terrorists may use radio systems in order to damage navigation equipment. (78) As worrying, though, is the passenger who can’t hear the instructions to turn off his radio because the music’s too loud. What is said about the over 100 aircraft incidents in the past 15 years
A. They may have been caused by the damage to the radio systems.
B. They may have taken place during take- off and landing.
C. They were proved to have been caused by the passengers’ portable computers.
D. They were suspected to have resulted from electromagnetic interferenc
这个俱乐部的服务员接受了很多技能培训,小钰是这个俱乐部的一名服务员,所以她接受了很多技能培训。 以下哪项论证展示的推理错误与上述论证中的最相似( )
A. 这所学校里的学生学习英语这门功课,小常是这所学校的一名学生,所以他也学习英语这门课程
B. 这本经济杂志的编辑们写了许多经济方面的短评,老李是其中的一名编辑,所以他也写过许多经济方面的短评
C. 这个工作室的大多数员工工作努力,小爽是这个工作室的员工,所以她工作努力
D. 所有的旧电脑需要经常重做系统,这部电脑是新的,所以不需要经常重做系统
北华大学随机抽取两个学生样本群体回答一项就业调查提出的问题。一个学生样本群体在回答了问题后的六个月以后,另一个学生样本群体回答了相同的问题,不过,问题排列的顺序做出了调整。两组学生对许多单个问题的回答方式有很大的差别,这表明有时只因排在前面的问题不同就会导致对后面问题的不同回答。 以下最能支持这一结论的是( )。
A. 对问题的重新排列并没有使六个月前的每一个问题的前后顺序都发生变化
B. 回答市场调查问题的学生六个月后通常记不住他们当初的回答
C. 学生不会在一年中的不同时间对这些问题做出不同的回答
D. 第一次调查样本中的学生与第二次调查样本中的学生不是完全不同的
即使没有出过国,在西方的电影中也常看到这样的镜头:几个人并排走在下水道里,不管是为了逃命,还是为了追凶,人家的下水道宽敞得令人瞠目。如果再深究一下,那些下水道是100多年前、甚至200多年前修建的。再看看我们的下水道,莫说钻人,一头猪如果不幸跑到了下水道,结局也恐怕会很悲惨。我们的下水道狭小不用说,施工质量也难有保障。于是,三天两头挖开修,下水道每修一次,GDP就增长一次,而财富却在悄无声息中被损耗,当然,城市的运行效率也大大降低。西方国家修下水道,一劳永逸,此后虽然再也不能在拉动GDP增长方面作贡献,却在悄无声息中,节约着巨额财富,提升着城市的运行效率,提升着人们的生活质量。 根据这段文字,可以看出作者的意图是( )。
A. 强调中国的下水道质量太差
B. 呼吁人们节省财富,不能只看GDP的增长
C. 批判中国现在的经济增长非常盲目,应向西方学习借鉴经验
D. 提醒中国与世界之间其实隔着一条下水道