题目内容

You are working on a study and the results are not coming out the way you want them to. You just cannot confirm the hypothesis no matter how many times you rerun the tests. You're the one conducting the research and the only one managing the data analysis. You want to successfully resolve this. What are your options?

A. You make very minor modifications to the data and slightly alter the images to keep it consistent. The likelihood of anyone challenging the results are slim.
B. You leave out the problematic data and only use findings that support your hypothesis.
C. You consult with your supervisor and/or lab team to troubleshoot, even if it means going back to the drawing board. There are no short cuts in science.

查看答案

搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈

更多问题

You are a researcher wanting to publish a study undertaken in human beings. Do you need to provide detail about which organization gave ethical approval and how consent was obtained?

A. YES
B. NO

查看答案

What situation might be considered a conflict of interest? A researcher who (select all that apply):

A. Owns stock of the pharmaceutical company commissioning the research work.
B. Is also a consultant to the company commissioning the research work.
C. Is asked to review a manuscript submitted by a colleague.
D. All of the above.

查看答案

Let's say Cell accepts your paper for publication. Is it always okay to submit a version of that paper in a language other than English to a journal in a different country or does that count as duplicate submission?

A. YES, it's okay. It does not count as duplicate submission.
B. NO, it's not okay. It counts as duplicate submission.

查看答案

You are preparing a paper that involves a complex concept but you're having difficulty putting into words precisely how this concept works. You see an excellent explanation in another published paper. Is it okay to use this explanation word for word in your paper without referring to the other paper?

A. Yes
B. No

查看答案