题目内容
56（）
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Everything has a name. All people, places, and things have names. For example, Jenny is the name of a student from England. England is the name of her country. Cities and towns have names, too. Schools and office buildings also have names. All things have names. For example, tomato, potato and bean are names of vegetables. Apple, orange and banana are names of fruits. Names are important.We use names every day. When we meet a new person, we usually ask, "What’s your name" It is important to learn a person’s name. Most people have two names. Some people have more names. Names are different all over the world. In Jenny’ s class, Jenny must learn the names of students from all over the world. This is very difficult because the names are very different.In the United States, most people have a first name, a middle name, and a last name. Parents choose the first and middle names for their baby. There are names for boys and names for girls. For example, John, Peter, Tom, and Mike are all names for boys. Elizabeth, Betty, Susan, and Mary are all names for girls. The last name is the family name. Usually it is the father’ s family name. In a family, the mother, the father, and the children usually have the same last name.Sometimes a person has a nickname(绰号) ,too. A nickname is a special name. It is not a person’s real name. Abraham Lincoln’s nickname was "Honest Abe". An honest person always tells the truth, and Abe is short for Abraham. Because he was an "honest person, his nickname was " Honest Abe". Pele (贝利) is a nickname, too. The football player’s real name is Edison Arantes de Nascimento, but everyone calls him Pele. Do you have a nicknameNames are different all over the world. They can be long or short, hut they are always very important. Why does everything have a name()
The current emergency in Mexico City that has taken over our lives is nothing I could ever have imagined for me or my children. We are living in an environmental crisis, an air-pollution emergency of unprecedented severity. What it really means is that just to breathe here is to play a dangerous game with your health. As parents, what terrorizes us most are reports that children are at higher risk because they breathe more times per minute. What more can we do to protect them and ourselves Our pediatrician’s (儿科医师的) medical recommendation was simple: abandon the city permanently. We are foreigners and we are among the small minority that can afford to leave. We are here because of my husband’s work. We are fascinated by Mexico—its history and rich culture. We know that for us, this is a temporary danger. However, we cannot stand for much longer the fear we feel for our boys. We cannot stop them from breathing. But for millions, there is no choice. Their lives, their jobs, their futures depend on being here. Thousands of Mexicans arrive each day in this city, desperate for economic opportunities. Thousands more are born here each day. Entire families work in the streets and practically live there. It is a familiar sight: as parents hawk goods at stoplights, their children play in the grassy highway dividers, breathing exhaust fumes. I feel guilty complaining about my personal situation; we won’t be here long enough for our children to form the impression that skies are colored only gray. And yet the government cannot do what it must to end this problem. For any country, especially a developing Third World economy like Mexico’s, the idea of barring from the capital city enough cars, closing enough factories and spending the necessary billions on public transportation is simply not an option. So when things get bad, as in the current emergency, Mexico takes half measures—prohibiting some more cars from circulating, stopping some factories from producing—that even its own officials concede aren’t adequate. The word "emergency" implies the unusual. But when daily life itself is an emergency, the concept loses its meaning. It is human nature to try to adapt to that which we cannot change, or to mislead ourselves into believing we can adapt. Which of the following statements is NOT TRUE according to the passage
(二)某地价评估事务所2010年6月20日接到A市政府的估价口头委托，估价对象是位于城区一环内侧某中学老校址所占的土地。该校于1967年建成，现已根据政府安排整体迁出，所占土地为划拔方式取得。搬迁后的土地由政府收回后重新开发利用，并将土地的规划用途依法调整为商品住宅楼。目前，政府拟以公开拍卖方式出让该地块，并将按照一定的价格补偿给该中学。根据委托要求，地价评估事务所要对该地块的出让底价与收回补偿价格进行评估。接到委托后，事务所立即制订了一项工作计划和技术方案，并组织力量开展工作，按期完成了估价任务。 下面是该事务所此次估价工作日志的内容： (1)6月21日，启动估价工作，派两名土地估价师甲、乙和两名估价助理丙、丁负责估价工作，其中，甲和丙负责土地出让底价评估，乙和丁负责土地收回补偿价格评估。 (2)6月21日上午，甲和丙进入现场调查，乙和丁开始市场调查。 (3)6月22日上午，因所长外出，甲负责与市国土资源局签订合同。 (4)6月23日上午，确定土地估价事项，并制订评估技术路线和方法。 (5)6月23日下午，开始调查资料。 (6)6月25日上午，开始撰写报告。 (7)6月27日上午，报告完成，两份报告分别由甲、乙共同签字，由丙送估价报告给市国土资源局。 (8)6月30日上午，收到国土资源局付款。 关于评估技术路线和方法，日志有以下记录： (1)出让底价主要依据周边拍卖价格进行比照确定，同时采用剩余法进行评估。 (2)收回补偿价格评估主要采用市场比较法和收益还原法对原用途市场价进行评估。 请根据以上情况，回答下列问题： 日志中的估价技术路线是否合理如果不合理，原因何在
甲、乙两班学生到离学校24千米的飞机场参观。但只有一辆汽车，一次只能乘坐一个班的学生，为了尽快到达飞机场，两个班商定，由甲班先坐车，乙班先步行，同时出发，甲班学生在途中某次下车后再步行去飞机场，汽车则从某地立即返回接在途中步行的乙班学生，如果两班学生步行的速度相同，汽车速度是他们步行速度的7倍，那么汽车在距飞机场多少千米处返回接乙班学生，才能使两班学生同时到达飞机场（）
微信支付 
支付宝支付