题目内容
请根据下面短文回答第66～70题： Mr. Zhang is touring in a foreign country, and this is the room card of the hotel he is living in. (作图) The hotel is ______.
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
阅读下面文字，完成下列问题。物质结构研究的是：我们现实生活的物质世界，是如何由各自独特的微观粒子在不同层次上构成的；千差万别的物质性质是如何由它的微观结构所决定的。近代物质结构理论已经经历了三次大突破。从18世纪后半期开始，人们逐渐弄清了不同的物质是由不同的分子组成的，分子由原子组成，原子由围绕着它作高速旋转的核外电子和原子核组成。原子核虽然只有原子体积的十万亿分之一，但这种小小的原子核又是由中子、质子组成。在20世纪60年代，高能物理实验又发现了许多与质子、中子有强相互作用的新粒子，这些新粒子以及中子、质子、介子等统称强子。高能物理实验表明，强子也有结构，理论物理认为夸克是构成强子的下一层次粒子。理论物理学家把在夸克间传递强相互作用的粒子称为胶子。果然不出所料，这种胶子1979年被美籍华人、著名物理学家丁肇中发现，又一次证明了理论物理的正确。1979年基于基础理论，美国物理学家格拉肖·温伯格和巴基斯坦物理学家萨拉姆做出弱电中的三个中间玻色子W-、W+、Z0的预言，从而荣获诺贝尔物理奖。1983年上半年在日内瓦的质子——反质子对撞机上找到了它们，实验值与理论预期值也高度符合。目前，物质结构理论正面临第四次突破。 文中“果然不出所料”的“所料”系指（）。
第二节 短文理解 1 阅读下面短文，从[A](Right)、[B](Wrong)、[C](Doesn’t Say)三个判断中选择一个正确选项。 Jo was the most popular boy in the school. He was tall and strong, with dark brown haft and green eyes and the sweetest smile. He was good at all sports and he was top of his class. There was keen competition among the girls to attract his attention. Yet, Jo was nice to all of them, even the plain, shy ones but he didn’t have a steady girlfriend. Ella was the only one who didn’t seem to have any romantic interest in him; she treated him friendly and the others didn’t consider her as rival. But she knew him very well. Jo and Ella were the best friends. They talked about their problems, exchanged ideas, gave advice to each other and played jokes on each other occasionally. One day, Jo didn’t go to school. He stayed away for a week, then the news came: his mother had died. When he went back to school, he looked fired and sad, like someone who walks without knowing where he’s going. No one knew what to say to him. The easy smile and superficial chat couldn’t reach him any more. When he met Ella, they didn’t say much. There was no need to. She simply shook hands with him, then hugged him briefly and asked him to go and see her in the afternoon. It all started right then. The girls didn’t like Jo any more after his mother died.
请根据下面短文回答第66～70题： Mr. Zhang is touring in a foreign country, and this is the room card of the hotel he is living in. (作图) Which of the following is true [A] Open the door when the red fight is on. [B] The card can be used to open the door. [C] Mr. Zhang can keep the card when he checks out.
It is incongruous that the number of British institutions offering MBA courses should have grown by 254 percent during a period when the economy has been sliding into deeper recession. Optimists, or those given to speed, assumptions, might think it marvelous to have such a resource of business school graduates ready for the recovery. Unfortunately, there is now much doubt about the value of the degree not least among MBA graduates themselves, suffering as they are from the effects of recession and facing the prospect of shrinking management structures. What was taken some years ago as a ticket of certain admission to success is now being exposed to the scrutiny of cost-conscious employers who seek "can-dos" rather than "might-dos", and who feel that academia has not been sufficiently appreciative of the needs of industry or of the employers’ possible contribution. It is curious, given the name of the degree, that there should be no league table for UK business schools: no unanimity about what the degree should encompass; and no agreed system of accreditation. Surely there is something wrong. One wonders where all the tutors for this massive infusion of business expertise came from and why all this mushrooming took place. Perhaps companies that made large investments would have been wiser to invest in already existing managers, perched anxiously on their own internal ladders. The Institute of Management’s 1992 survey, which revealed that eighty-one per cent of managers thought they personally would be more effective if they received more training, suggests that this might be the case. There is, too, the fact that training alone does not make successful managers. They need the inherent qualifications. Of character; a degree of self-subjugation; and, above all, the ability to communicate and lead; more so now, when empowerment is a buzzword that is at least generating genuflexions, if not total conviction. One can easily think of people, some comparatively unlettered, who are now lauded captains of industry. We may, therefore, not need to be too concerned about the fall in applications for business school places, or even the doubt about MBAs. The proliferation and subsequent questioning may have been an inevitable evolution. If the Management Charter Initiative, now exploring the introduction of a senior management qualification, is successful, there will be a powerful corrective. We believe now that management is all about change. One hopes there will be some of that in relationship between management and science within industry, currently causing concern and which is overdue for attention. No one doubts that we need more scientists and innovation to give us an edge in an increasingly competitive world. If scientists feel themselves under-valued and under-used, working in industrial ghettos, that is not a promising augury for the future. It seems we have to resolve these misapprehensions between science and industry. Above all, we have to make sure that management is not itself smug about its status and that it does not issue mission statements about communication without realizing that the essence of it is a dialogue. More empowerment is required and we should strive to achieve it. What is the writer’s view in the reading passage
微信支付 
支付宝支付