题目内容

The inner circle train from the City rushed impetuously out of a black hole and pulled up with a discordant, grinding racket in the smirched twilight of a West-End station. A line of doors flew open and a lot of men stepped out headlong. They had high hats, healthy pale faces, dark overcoats and shiny boots; they held in their gloved hands thin umbrellas and hastily folded evening papers that resembled stiff, dirty rags of greenish, pinkish, or whitish color. Alvan Harvey stepped out with the rest, a smoldering cigar between his teeth. A disregarded little woman in rusty black, with both arms full of parcels, ran along in distress, bolted suddenly into a third-class compartment and the train went on. The slamming of carriage doors burst out sharp and spiteful like a fusillade; an icy draught mingled with acrid fumes swept the whole length of the platform and made a tottering old man, wrapped up to his ears in a woolen comforter, stop short in the moving throng to cough violently over his stick. No one spared him a glance. Alvan Hervey passed through the ticket gate. Between the bare walls of a sordid staircase men clambered rapidly; their backs appeared alike—almost as if they had been wearing a uniform; their indifferent faces were varied but somehow suggested kinship, like the faces of a band of brothers who through prudence, dignity, disgust, or foresight would resolutely ignore each other; and their eyes, quick or slow; their eyes gazing up the dusty steps; their eyes brown, black, gray, blue, had all the same stare, concentrated and empty, satisfied and unthinking. Outside the big doorway of the street they scattered in all directions, walking away fast from one another with the hurried air of men fleeing from something compromising; from familiarity or confidences; from something suspected and concealed—like truth or pestilence. Alvin Harvey hesitated, standing alone in the doorway for a moment; then decided to walk home. He strode firmly. A misty rain settled like silvery dust on clothes, on moustaches; wetted the faces, varnished the flagstones, darkened the walls, dripped from umbrellas. And he moved on in the rain with careless serenity, with the tranquil ease of someone successful and disdainful, very sure of himself—a man with lots of money and friends. He was tall, well set-up, good-looking and healthy; and his clear pale face had under its commonplace refinement that slight tinge of overbearing brutality which is given by the possession of only partly difficult accomplishments; by excelling in games, or in the art of making money; by the easy mastery over animals and over needy men. He was going home much earlier than usual, straight from the City and without calling at his club. He considered himself well connected, well educated and intelligent. Who doesn’t But his connections, education and intelligence were strictly on a par with those of the men with whom he did business or amused himself. He had married five years ago. At the time all his acquaintances had said he was very much in love; and he had said so himself, frankly, because it is very well understood that every man falls in love once in his life—unless his wife dies, when it may be quite praiseworthy to fall in love again. The girl was healthy, tall, fair, and in his opinion was well connected, well educated and intelligent. She was also intensely bored with her home where, as if packed in a tight box, her individuality—of which she was very conscious—had no play. She strode like a grenadier, was strong and upright like an obelisk, had a beautiful face, a candid brow, pure eyes, and not a thought of her own in her head. He surrendered quickly to all those charms, and she appeared to him so unquestionably of the right sort that he did not hesitate for a moment to declare himself in love. Under the cover of that sacred and poetical fiction he desired her masterfully, for various reasons; but principally for the satisfaction of having his own way. He was very dull and solemn about it—for no earthly reason, unless to conceal his feelings—which is an eminently proper thing to do. Nobody, however, would have been shocked had he neglected that duty, for the feeling he experienced really was a longing—a longing stronger and a little more complex no doubt, but no more reprehensible in its nature than a hungry man’s appetite for his dinner. It can be inferred from the passage that Alvan

A. fell in love with his wife at the first sight.
B. made contact with all kinds of people.
C. often went to his club after work.
D. wanted to have a pretty daughter.

查看答案
更多问题

Mary: Good morning. Dr. Brown’s office. () Dianna: Good morning. I want to make an appointment with Dr. Brown.

A. That’s quite dear
B. I’m sure it isn’t so bad
C. please have a seat
D. that sort of thing
E. that’s a pity
F. May I help you
G. What should I do
H. That’s easy for you to say

哪项血气分析可以提示存在慢性阻塞性肺气肿()

A. FiO20.50,PaO2 300mmHg,PaCO2 30mmHg
B. FiO20.50,PaO2 150mmHg,PaCO2 54mmHg
C. FiO20.50,PaO2 63mmHg,PaCO2 28mmHg
D. FiO20.50,PaO2 300mmHg,PaCO2 42mmHg
E. FiO20.50,PaO2 200mmHg,PaCO2 77mmHg

History buffs still wax poetic about the brutal patent battles a century ago between the Wright brothers and Glenn Curtis, another aviation pioneer. The current smart-phone patent war does not quite have the same romance, but it could be as important. Hardly a week passes without a new case. Motorola sued Apple this month, having itself been sued by Microsoft a few days earlier. Since 2006 the number of mobile-phone-related patent complaints has increased by 20% annually, according to Lex Machina, a firm that keeps a database of intellectual-property spats in America. Most suits were filed by patent owners who hail from another industry, such as Kodak (a firm from a bygone era that now makes printers), or by patent trolls (firms that buy patents not in order to make products, but to sue others for allegedly infringing them). But in recent months the makers of handsets and related software themselves have become much more litigious, reports Joshua Walker, the boss of Lex Machina. This orgy for lawyers is partly a result of the explosion of the market for smart-phones. IDC, a market-research firm, expects that 270m smart phones will be sold this year: 55% more than in 2009. "It has become worthwhile to defend one’s intellectual property," says Richard Windsor of Nomura, an investment bank. Yet there is more than this going on. Smart phones are not just another type of handset, but fully-fledged computers, which come loaded with software and double as digital cameras and portable entertainment centers. They combine technologies from different industries, most of them patented. Given such complexity, sorting out who owns what requires time and a phalanx of lawyers. The convergence of different industries has also led to a culture clash. When it comes to intellectual property, mobile-phone firms have mostly operated like a club. They jointly develop new technical standards: for example, for a new generation of wireless networks. They then license or swap the patents "essential" to this standard under "fair and reasonable" conditions. Not being used to such a collectivist set-up, Apple refused to pay up, which triggered the first big legal skirmish over smart-phones. A year ago Nokia lobbed a lawsuit at Apple, alleging that its American rival’s phone infringes on a number of its "essential patents". A couple of months later, Apple returned the favour, alleging that Nokia had copied some phone features. Since then both sides have upped the ante by filing additional complaints. Lending ferocity to this legal firefight is the fact that competition in the smart phone market is not merely about individual products, but entire platforms and operating systems. These are the infrastructures that allow other firms to develop applications, or "apps", for these devices. Should any one firm gain an important lead, it might dominate the industry for decades—just as Microsoft has dominated the market for personal-computer (PC) software. Yet there is a difference between the smart-phone war and the earlier one over PCs. There is a new type of player: firms with opera-source platforms. Google, for instance, which makes its money from advertisements, does not charge for Android (its operating system for smart-phones) and lets others modify the software. This makes life hard for vendors of proprietary platforms, such as Apple and Microsoft. Some expect Apple and Microsoft t0 sue Google. Yet this is unlikely, because the online giant will be hard to pin down. Google does not earn any money with Android, which makes it difficult to calculate any potential damage awards and patent royalties. The frenzy of smart-phone litigation could last for years. Litigation may also make smart-phones dearer. Mr. White of Bristol York estimates that device makers already have to pay royalties for 200—300 patents for a typical smart-phone. Patent costs are 15,20-of its selling price, or about half of what the hardware components cost. "If 50 people [each] want 2% of a device’s value, we have a problem," says Josh Lerner, a professor at Harvard Business School. Finally, there is a danger that the current intensity of litigation will become normal. Pessimists predict an everlasting patent war, much as the wider information-technology industry seems permanently embroiled in antitrust action. The Wright brothers’ legal skirmishes were put to rest only by the outbreak of the first World war. With luck, thee smart-phone patent: battles will end more quietly. The word "spats" in the second paragraph probably means

A. patents.
B. disputes.
C. licenses.
D. arbitration.

合同的订立包括要约和承诺两个阶段。( )

A. 对
B. 错

答案查题题库