题目内容
A股份有限公司(以下简称甲公司)是一家上市公司，2003年10月10日向B公司发出传真，欲向B公司购买一套大型成套设备，并随同传真发送了该设备的主要技术要求及相关资料，并提出该设备的总价款最高为800万元，请B公司在10日内给予答复，若B公司同意，双方再行签订书面合同，合同自双方签字盖章之日起生效。B公司在10月19日给予答复接受A公司的要求，但是，A公司在接到B公司回复的第二天，传真至B公司，称其已经找到C公司订立合同，故此次不再考虑与B公司签订合同。B公司为此非常气愤，称其因为考虑到A公司的报价较高，为了向A公司履行合同，对其他客户发出的订立该种设备的要求都放弃了。至此，由于A公司的出尔反尔，本可以售出的设备而搁置，使B公司蒙受损失。故B公司要求A公司赔偿。 A公司与C公司订立某大型设备的买卖合同，由于疏忽双方未在合同中约定检验期限。设备运抵A公司后，A公司对其进行了检验，未发现质量问题，于是投入使用。至第二年，设备出现故障，经反复查找，发现设备关键部位的质量存有瑕疵。按照该设备的说明书，其质量保证期为5年。 A公司与C公司订立上述买卖合同时，为了向C公司履行付款义务，于2003年10月20日特向银行申请贷款800万元，贷款期限为2年，A公司以其价值500万元的房产作抵押，与银行订立了抵押担保合同，并在登记机关办理了抵押物的登记手续。其余贷款及利息由D公司承担保证责任，为此D公司与银行签订了书面保证合同。至2005年银行贷款到期，要求A公司偿还贷款本息。A公司无力偿还，银行要求保证人D公司承担保证责任；但是，此时法院已经受理了对D公司申请破产的案件。 要求：根据上述资料，回答下列问题： (1)A公司的购买行为是否须经独立董事发表意见为什么 (2) 2003年10月10日，甲公司发出传真的行为属于何种行为A公司能否取消向B公司所发信息如果A公司在B公司向其作出回复之前，A公司能否撤销所发信息A公司是否应当对B公司的损失承担责任 (3)C公司是否应对该设备的质量瑕疵承担责任为什么A公司可以要求C公司采取什么措施 (4)假设A公司抵押的房产发生火灾被毁，银行的抵押担保债权能否实现如果A公司的该抵押房产根据保险合同的约定，可以从保险公司获得400万元的赔偿，银行的抵押担保债权能否实现，其金额有多少如果银行放弃抵押担保，保证人D公司的保证责任范围如何确定 (5)D公司对A公司债务的保证为何种方式银行能否要求D公司承担保证责任银行能否作为债权人申报债权其申报的债权数额应当是多少
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
在成绩表中，只显示分数最高的前10名学生的记录，SQL语句为： SELECT*【 】10 FROM成绩表【 】总分DESC
Within hours of appearing on television to announce the end of conscription, President Jacques Chirac moved quickly to prevent any dissent from within the military establishment. Addressing more than 500 military staff officers at the military academy in Paris yesterday, Mr. Chirac said clearly that he "expected" their loyalty in the work of rebuilding France’s national defense.He understood their "legitimate concerns, questions and emotions" at the reforms, but added. "You must understand that there is not and never has been any rigid model for French defense. Military service has been compulsory for less than a century. Realism required that our armed forces should now be professional."The president’s decision to abolish conscription over a period of six years removes a rite of passage for young Frenchmen that has existed since the Revolution, even though obligatory national service only became law in 1905. As recently as 1993, an opinion poll showed that more than 60% of French people said they feared the abolition of conscription could endanger national security. A poll conducted this month, however, showed that 70% of those asked favored ending of practice, and on the streets and in offices yesterday, the response to Mr. Chirac’s announcement was generally positive.Among people who completed their 10-month period of national service in the last few years or were contemplating the prospect, there was almost universal approval, tempered by a sense that something hard to define--mixing with people from other backgrounds, a formative experience, a process that encouraged national or social cohesion--might be lost.Patrick, who spent his year in the French city of Valance assigning and collecting uniforms, and is now a computer manager, said he was in tears for his first week, and hated most of his time. He thought it was "useless" as a form of military training-- "I only fired a rifle twice"--but, in retrospect, useful for learning how to get on with people and instilling patriotism.As many as 25% of those liable for military service in France somehow avoid it--the percentage is probably much greater in the more educated and higher social classes.According to Geoffroy, a 26-year-old reporter, who spent his time in the navy with the information office in central Paris, the injustice is a good reason for abolishing it. People with money or connections, he said, can get well-paid assignments abroad. "It’s not fair: some do it, some don’t."Several expressed support for the idea of a new socially-oriented voluntary service that would be open to both men and women. But the idea seemed less popular among women. At present, women have the option of voluntary service and a small number choose to take it. What worries people who have recently completed their military service about the reform（）
Many theories concerning the causes of juvenile delinquency (crimes committed by young people) focus either on the individual or on society as the major contributing influence. Theories (21) on the individual suggest that children engage in criminal behavior (22) they were not sufficiently penalized for previous misdeeds or that they have learned criminal behavior through (23) with others. Theories focusing on the role of society suggest that children commit crimes in (24) to their failure to rise above their socioeconomic status, (25) as a rejection of middle-class values. Most theories of juvenile delinquency have focused on children from disadvantaged families, (26) the fact that children from wealthy homes also commit crimes. The latter may commit crimes (27) lack of adequate pa- rental control. All theories, however, are tentative and are (28) to criticism. Changes in the social structure may indirectly (29) juvenile crime rates. For example, changes in the economy that (30) to fewer job opportunities for youth and rising unemployment (31) make gainful employment increasingly difficult to obtain. The resulting discontent may in (32) lead more youths into criminal-behavior. Families have also (33) changes these years. More families consist of one-parent households or two working parents; (34) , children are likely to have less supervision at home (35) was common m the traditional family structure. 26（）
What are the chances that we will encounter some alien form of life, as we explore the galaxy.If the argument about the time scale for the appearance of life on Earth is correct, there ought to be many other stars, whose planets have life on them. Some of these stellar systems could have formed 5 billion years before the Earth. So why is the galaxy not crawling with self designing mechanical or biological life forms Why hasn’t the Earth been visied, and even colonized. I discount suggestions that UFOs contain beings from outer space. I think any visits by aliens would be much more obvious, and probably also, much more unpleasant. What is the explanation of why we have not been visited One possibility is that the argument about the appearance of life on Earth is wrong. Maybe the probability of life spontaneously appearing is so low that Earth is the only planet in the galaxy, or in the observable universe, in which it happened. Another possibility is that there was a reasonable probability of forming self-reproducing system, like cells, but most of these forms of life did not evolve intelligence. A third possibility is that there is a reasonable probability for life to form, and to evolve to intelligent beings, in the external transmission phase. But at that point, the system becomes unstable, and the intelligent life destroys itself. This would be a very pessimistic conclusion. I very much hope it isn’t true. I prefer a fourth possibility: there are other forms of intelligent life out there, but we have been overlooked. There used to be a project called SETI, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. It involved scanning the radio frequencies, to see if we could pick up signals from alien civilizations. I thought this project was worth supporting, though it was cancelled due to a lack of funds. But we should have been wary of answering back, until we have developed a bit further. Meeting a more advanced civilization, at our present stage, might be a bit like the original inhabitants of America meeting Columbus. I don’t think they were better off for it. By comparison, the author considers that
微信支付 
支付宝支付