题目内容
海星电脑公司与阳辰电子研究所在1999年12月签订了一份合同。双方商定，联合开发研制一种新型的集成电路块，合同中的仲裁条款规定：因履行本合同发生的争议，由双方协商解决；协商不了的，请有关仲裁委员会仲裁。2000年1月，双方发生争议，阳辰电子研究所向本单位所在地的A市仲裁委员会递交了仲裁申请书，海星电脑公司拒绝答辩。双方经过协商，重新签订了一份仲裁协议，商定将此合同争议提交海星电脑公司所在地的B市仲裁委员会进行仲裁。事后，阳辰电子研究所担心B市仲裁委员会实行地方保护主义，故未申请仲裁，而向合同签订地C市人民法院起诉，起诉时未说明此前两次约定仲裁的情况，法院受理了本案，并依法向海星电脑公司送达了起诉状副本，海星电脑公司向法院提交了答辩状。法院经审理，判决被告海星电脑公司败诉，被告不服，立即上诉。争议发生后签订的仲裁协议有效还是无效( )
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
When I was walking down the street the other day, I happened to notice a small brown leather wallet, lying on the sidewalk. I picked it up and opened it to see if I could find out the owner’ s name. There was nothing inside it except some change and an old photograph—a picture of a woman and a young girl about twelve years old, who looked like the woman’ s daughter. I put the photograph back and took the wallet to the police station, where I handed it to the desk sergeant. Before I left, the sergeant took down my name and address in case the owner might want to write and thank me.That evening I went to have dinner with my aunt and uncle. They had also invited a young woman so that there would be four people at the table. Her face was familiar, I was quite sure that we had not met before, but I couldn’t remember where I had seen her. In the course of conversation, however, the young woman happened to mention that she had lost her wallet that afternoon. All at once I realized where I had seer/her. She was the young girl in the photograph, although she was now much older. She was very surprised, of course, when I was able to describe her wallet to her. Then I explained that I had recognized her from the photograph I had found in the wallet. My uncle insisted on going to the police station immediately to claim the wallet. As the police sergeant handed it over, he said that it was amazing that I had not only found the wallet, but also the person who had lost it. According to the passage, the writer found the wallet in the street（）
A县甲借给B县乙10万元，B县乙借给C县丙20万元，此两项借款均已届还款期限，甲急于用钱，但经调查了解乙无力还款，便多次催促乙向丙索还欠款，乙置之不理。设甲向丙提起诉讼胜诉，丙应向谁履行债务( )
米乔特做过一个实验，他用一个黑色的长方形A和一个灰色的长方形B，先使A沿着直线移动，一直触及B后停止A的移动，然后B开始移动，逐渐离开A。实验者操纵A与B的移动速度，使两者作不同的变化，这时被试者也随之作不同的归因。若A移向B的速度大于B离开A的速度，被试者将之归因于“B的离开是受到A的影响”；反过来，若A移向B的速度小于B离开A的速度，则被试者归因为B的移动是一种“逃避”行为，是B出于对A的“恐惧”。 (1)被试者的归因偏差类型是什么 (2)常见的归因偏差还有哪些 (3)联系管理实际谈谈如何在管理中克服归因偏差。
案情：甲和乙均缺钱。乙得知甲的情妇丙家是信用社代办点，配有保险柜，认为肯定有钱，便提议去丙家借钱，并说：“如果她不借，也许我们可以偷或者抢她的钱。”甲说：“别瞎整!”乙未再吭声。某晚，甲、乙一起开车前往丙家。乙在车上等，甲进屋向丙借钱，丙说：“家里没钱。”甲在丙家吃饭过夜。乙见甲长时间不出来，只好开车回家。甲一觉醒来，见丙已睡着，便起身试图打开保险柜。丙惊醒大声斥责甲，说道：“快住手，不然我报警了!”甲恼怒之下将丙打死，藏尸地窖。 甲不知密码打不开保险柜，翻箱倒柜只找到了丙的一张储蓄卡及身份证。甲回家后想到乙会开保险柜，即套间乙开柜方法，但未提及杀丙一事。甲将丙的储蓄卡和身份证交乙保管，声称系从丙处所借。两天后甲又到丙家，按照乙的方法打开保险柜，发现柜内并无钱款。乙未与甲商量，通过丙的身份证号码试出储蓄卡密码，到商场刷卡购买了一件价值两万元的皮衣。 案发后，公安机关认为甲有犯罪嫌疑，即：对其实施拘传。甲在振出所乘民警应对突发事件无人看管之机逃跑。半年后，得知甲行踪的乙告知甲，公安机关正在对甲进行网上通缉，甲于是到派出所交代了自己的罪行。 问题： 请根据《刑法》有关规定，对上述案件中甲、乙的各种行为和相关事实、情节进行分析，分别提出处理意见，并简要说明理由。
微信支付 
支付宝支付