题目内容
小郭小丁都在国税局工作，科长有一份材料需要撰写，科长先找小丁，小丁说，我手里的季度汇报材料要做，很忙，抽不开身;科长又想，找小郭吧，小郭文笔好。小郭说，我刚来单位，对单位的一些情况还不熟悉……科长开会去了，说回头再说。科长开完会要外出，没遇到小丁，就对小郭说，材料还是让小丁写，你和他说一下。假如你是小郭，请现在模拟如何跟小丁沟通，并且尽量消除可能产生的误会。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
很高兴又能见到您。
简介黄河上游甘青地区新石器时代文化发展序列。
Passage Three The average number of authors on scientific papers is sky-rocketing. That’s partly because labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also because U.S. government agencies have started to promote "team science". As physics developed in the post-World War II era, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally. Yet multiple authorship—however good it may be in other ways--presents problems for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, how should the liability be allocated among the authors If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much-cited paper was really the candidate’s work or a coauthor’s, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility. Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame. According to the passage, whether multiple authors of a paper should be taken collectively or individually depends on ______
(二)全陪小张带领南京某旅行社的旅游团一行18人前往上海旅游观光，在他们游览完上海的美景之后，有客人提出来，晚上应该去娱乐娱乐，小张为了客人的安全，建议大家不要走的太远，最好在饭店内或饭店周围，游客们理解了小张的好意，就决定在宾馆旁边的卡拉OK唱歌，大家为了感谢小张，就邀请他一同前往。在卡拉OK厅，大家正玩得高兴时，突然吧台方向冒出了黑烟，紧接着燃起了火苗，形势危急。 导游人员引导大家自救的方法有（）。
微信支付 
支付宝支付