题目内容
In a world where it seems we already have too much to do，and too many things to think about，it seems the last thing we need is something new that we have to learn．But use cases do solve a problem with requirements：with____________(71)declarative requirements it’s hard to describe steps and sequences of events． Use cases，stated simply,allow description of sequences of events that，taken together, lead to a system doing something useful．As simple as this sounds，this is important．When confronted only with a pile of requirements，it’S often ____________(72)to make sense of what the authors of the requirements really wanted the system to do．In the preceding example，use cases reduce the ambiguity of the requirements by specifying exactly when and under what conditions certain behavior occurs；as such，the sequence of the behaviors can be regarded as a requirement．Use cases are particularly well suited to capturing these kind of requirements．Although this may sound simple，the fact is that __________(73)requirement capture approaches，with their emphasis on declarative requirements and”shall”statements．completely fail to capture the___________(74)of the system’s behavior．Use cases are a simple yet powerful way to express the behavior of the system in Way that all stakeholders can easily understand． But，like anything，use cases come with their own problems，and as useful as they are，they can be ___________(75)．The result is something that is as bad，if not worse，than the original problem．Therein it’s important to utilize use cases effectively without creating a greater problem than the one you started with． (73)
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
住所地在H省K市L区的甲公司与住所地在F省E市D区的乙公司签订了一份钢材买卖合同，价款数额为90万元。合同在B市C区签订，双方约定合同履行地为W省Z市Y区，同时约定如因合同履行发生争议，由B市仲裁委员会仲裁。合同履行过程中，因钢材质量问题，甲公司与乙公司发生争议，甲公司欲申请仲裁解决。因B市有两个仲裁机构，分别为丙仲裁委员会和丁仲裁委员会(两个仲裁委员会所在地都在B市C区)，乙公司认为合同中的仲裁条款无效，欲向有关机构申请确认仲裁条款无效。请回答下列问题。 如仲裁条款被确认无效，甲公司与乙公司又无法达成新的协议，甲公司欲向法院起诉乙公司。关于对本案享有管辖权的法院，下列选项正确的是：
In a world where it seems we already have too much to do，and too many things to think about，it seems the last thing we need is something new that we have to learn．But use cases do solve a problem with requirements：with____________(71)declarative requirements it’s hard to describe steps and sequences of events． Use cases，stated simply,allow description of sequences of events that，taken together, lead to a system doing something useful．As simple as this sounds，this is important．When confronted only with a pile of requirements，it’S often ____________(72)to make sense of what the authors of the requirements really wanted the system to do．In the preceding example，use cases reduce the ambiguity of the requirements by specifying exactly when and under what conditions certain behavior occurs；as such，the sequence of the behaviors can be regarded as a requirement．Use cases are particularly well suited to capturing these kind of requirements．Although this may sound simple，the fact is that __________(73)requirement capture approaches，with their emphasis on declarative requirements and”shall”statements．completely fail to capture the___________(74)of the system’s behavior．Use cases are a simple yet powerful way to express the behavior of the system in Way that all stakeholders can easily understand． But，like anything，use cases come with their own problems，and as useful as they are，they can be ___________(75)．The result is something that is as bad，if not worse，than the original problem．Therein it’s important to utilize use cases effectively without creating a greater problem than the one you started with． (75)
如果在查找路由表时发现有多个选项匹配，那么应该根据___________(25)原则进行选择。假设路由表有4个表项如下所示，那么与地址139．17．179．92匹配的表项是____________(26)。 (26)
事件1某市拟建一自然博物馆，建设单位通过公开招标确定一家工程造价咨询公司承担施工招标代理工作。由于招标工作时间紧迫，双方在中标通知书发出后第二天就签订了委托合同。之后双方又对代理费用进行了协商，最后签订了一份酬金比中标价降低10万元的补充协议。事件2该项目施工招标采用资格预审，3月1日开始发售资格预审文件，要求3月5日提交资格预审申请文件。有A、B、C、D、E、F六家施工单位报名投标，经造价咨询公司资格预审均符合要求，但建设单位以A施工单位是外地企业，且距本市较远，不便沟通为由拒绝其参加投标。事件3开标之后，由于投标单位数量较多，业主代表为了更好地控制投资，决定将招标控制价由8000万元降为7500万元；同时为了保障工程质量，规定最低报价不得低于6500万元。事件4评标委员会由6人组成，其中当地建设行政管理部门的招标投标管理办公室副主任1人、建设单位代表1人、政府提供的专家库中抽取的技术经济专家4人。事件5评标过程中，B单位为了让评标委员会注意到本项目中用到的自创专利的优越性，申请提交一份该自创专利优越性的说明文件，并保证不会影响投标文件的实质性内容。结果评标委员拒绝了这一申请。事件6评标时发现，C施工单位投标报价明显低于其他投标单位报价且未能合理说明理由；D施工单位投标报价大写金额小于小写金额；E施工单位投标文件提供的检验标准和方法不符合招标文件的要求；F施工单位投标文件中某分项工程的报价有个别漏项。事件77月1日评标结束，评标委员会向业主提交评标报告并确定施工单位D作为中标候选人，业主于7月2日向施工单位D发出中标通知书，7月18日施工单位D向建设单位提交1000万元的履约保证金，7月20日签订施工合同，合同价为7000万元。问题： 事件5中评标委员会的做法是否正确说明理由。
微信支付 
支付宝支付