题目内容
As of 2001, the estimated total market value of organic products was estimated to be $20 billion. By 2002 this was $23 billion and by 2007 more than $ 46 billion according to Organic Monitor. In recent years both Europe and North America have experienced strong growth in organic farm land. However, this growth has occurred under different conditions. While the European Union has shifted agricultural subsidies to organic farmers due to environmental benefits, the United States has taken a free market ap proach. As a result, as of 2008, 4.1 percent of the European Union’s farm land was organically managed compared to just 0.6 percent of United States farmland. The growth of organic farmland area in the EU was 21% from 2005 to 2008 reaching a total of 7.8 million hectares. Statistics and Emergnig Trends 2009 lists the countries which had the most hectares in 2007. The country with the most organic land is Australia, with mote than 12 mil lion hectares, lollowed by Argentina, Brasil and the US. In total 32.2 mil lion hectares were under organic management in 2007. For 1999, 11 million hectares of organically managed land are reported, In recent years organic agriculture has grown greatly. Considering this rapid growth, it is within the nature of organic farming to keep it from becoming a large scale industrial business. As to organic food, two studies have found that children fed or ganic diets experienced significantly lower pesticide exposure than children fed conventional diets. Although the researchers did not collect health out come data in this study, they concluded "children whose diets consist of or ganic food items would have a lower probability of brain health risks". A 2007 study found that consumption of organic milk is associated with a de crease in risk for skin disease. Which country has the most organic land ac cording to statistics and Emerging Trends 2009
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
M: How did you get started in jazz singingW: It was a zigzag mute. I went from country music to singing madrigals, to singing folk, to opera, and then to jazz. People kept offering me differ ent projects, saying ’Well, I know that you have never done this before, so maybe you might not want to’ and I would say, ’ Oh, sure. I’ll try it. ’ So I went from form to form, to form and that is how.M: Are you going to keep moving around or are you stuck on jazz singing nowW: I think jazz is where I’m going to stay. I feel the most comfortable here, I have the most freedom here.M: When were the sessions for this album originally doneW: The session was done in Sept. of 1998 we mixed it down the second week of October, and nothing was done with it. I was busy for five and half years in a life of death battle with a portion of the government’ a le gal battle’ that I bad. So I had to drop everything to deal with it.M: Does anyone in your family have a musical backgroundW: I was brought up in a family that had an awful lot of musicians, and none of them took anything I was doing very seriously at all. I was actually the family joke. I just did this music to get it out of my system. I did not expect anyone to pay much attention to it. I just knew that I had to say it.M: Tbanks for talking with us, best wishes for your career.W: Thank you! What hasn’t Devorah Day involved in().
According to Peter Salovey, Yale psychologist and author of the term EQ, IQ gets you hired and EQ gets you promoted.Salovey tells of a simple test. Some four-year-old kids were invited into a room and were given the following instruction: "You can have this marshmallow right now; or if you wait, you can have two marshmallows when I get back. " Then, the researcher left. Some kids grabbed for the treat as soon as the researcher was out the door, while Others waited for the researcher to return. By the time the kids reached high school, significant differences appeared between the two groups. The kids who held out for two marshmallows were better adjusted, more popular, more adventurous, more confident, and more dependable than kids in the quick gratification group. The latter group was also more likely to be lonely, more easily frustrated, more stubborn, more likely to buckle under stress, and more likely to shy away from challenges. When both groups took scholastic aptitude tests, the "hold out group" walloped the "quick gratification group" by 210 points (the test scores range from a minimum of 200 points to a maximum of 800, with an average for all students of 500 points).Researchers have been discussing whether it’s possible to raise a person’s IQ. Geneticists say No, while social scientists say Yes. But while brain power researchers continue the debate, social science re searchers have concluded that it’s possible to improve a person’s EQ, and in particular, a person’s "people skills, " such as empathy, graciousness, and the ability to "read" a social situation.According to the social scientists, there is little doubt that people without sufficient EQ will have a hard time surviving in life. EQ is perhaps best observed in people described as either pessimists or optimists. Optimistic people have high EQ and treat obstacles as minor, while the pessimistic people have low EQ and personalizes all setbacks. In social research circles, EQ denotes one’s ability to survive, and it’s here that there may be an overlap between EQ, IQ, genetics and environment. As to that, I am reminded of the words of Darwin, "The biggest, the smartest, and the strongest are not the survivors. Rather, the survivors are the most adaptable. " Those of us who survive and thrive in this complex world are not only the most adaptable, but also the most optimistic and the most likely to have a high EQ. In the view of social scientists, EQ is ().
Text 3According to Peter Salovey, Yale psychologist and author of the term EQ, IQ gets you hired and EQ gets you promoted.Salovey tells of a simple test. Some four-year-old kids were invited into a room and were given the following instruction: "You can have this marshmallow right now; or if you wait, you can have two marshmallows when I get back. " Then, the researcher left. Some kids grabbed for the treat as soon as the researcher was out the door, while Others waited for the researcher to return. By the time the kids reached high school, significant differences appeared between the two groups. The kids who held out for two marshmallows were better adjusted, more popular, more adventurous, more confident, and more dependable than kids in the quick gratification group. The latter group was also more likely to be lonely, more easily frustrated, more stubborn, more likely to buckle under stress, and more likely to shy away from challenges. When both groups took scholastic aptitude tests, the "hold out group" walloped the "quick gratification group" by 210 points (the test scores range from a minimum of 200 points to a maximum of 800, with an average for all students of 500 points).Researchers have been discussing whether it’s possible to raise a person’s IQ. Geneticists say No, while social scientists say Yes. But while brain power researchers continue the debate, social science re searchers have concluded that it’s possible to improve a person’s EQ, and in particular, a person’s "people skills, " such as empathy, graciousness, and the ability to "read" a social situation.According to the social scientists, there is little doubt that people without sufficient EQ will have a hard time surviving in life. EQ is perhaps best observed in people described as either pessimists or optimists. Optimistic people have high EQ and treat obstacles as minor, while the pessimistic people have low EQ and personalizes all setbacks. In social research circles, EQ denotes one’s ability to survive, and it’s here that there may be an overlap between EQ, IQ, genetics and environment. As to that, I am reminded of the words of Darwin, "The biggest, the smartest, and the strongest are not the survivors. Rather, the survivors are the most adaptable. " Those of us who survive and thrive in this complex world are not only the most adaptable, but also the most optimistic and the most likely to have a high EQ. The word "walloped" (Line 10, Paragraph 2 ) most probably means " ()" .
Nowadays, air travel is very (21) . We are not surprised when we watch on TV that a politician has talked with French President in Paris and attended a meeting in Beijing on the same day. (22) , if a person takes long-distance flying frequently, he can be so tired that he maybe feel his brain is in one country, his (23) in another. (24) , he (25) knows where he is.When we fly from east to west or (26) versa, the (27) we experience after taking a long distance flying is (28) , because we cross time zones. According to doctors, air travelers, after crossing several time zones, are in no (29) to go to work, and they should go (30) to bed (31) arrival.As to airline pilots who often live (32) their own watches and ignore local time, there is no need for them to worry about their health although they sometimes have breakfast at midnight, be cause they are used to (33) and are (34) fit.Many businessmen like long-distance flights, thinking they are (35) to have been chosen and they are out for promotion. They are lucky if the company follows the doctor’s advice and al low them to rest for a day or two (36) working. However, sometimes the manager is so energetic that he believes everyone is (37) to be as fit as he is. Since he has never felt (38) after fly ing himself, the work he assigns is so (39) that the employee is too (40) to carry the work out satisfactorily. That is disastrous for the employee’s health and the company’s reputation. 22().
微信支付 
支付宝支付