Electronics are being recycled in record numbers as more states require it and more companies collect and even pay for discarded items, but the gains come with controversy. Some environmentalists complain that recycling is not keeping pace with electronics sales. Some say e-waste is being dumped in developing countries, where toxic materials such as lead and mercury can leach from landfills into groundwater. "It is a success story, but we’d like to see it get more successful" to keep up with the electronics boom, says Janette Petersen of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The amount of recycled items more than doubled from 1999 to 2007, the most recent year for which the EPA has figures. But as a percentage of all electronics, it increased less, from 15% to 18%. "The demand for electronics recycling has been growing," partly because of the switch last year to digital TV, says Jennifer Berry of Earth911. corn, a private group that keeps a database of recyclers. Last year, she says 31% of inquiries involved electronics, primarily TVs, batteries and computers. Public and private efforts are expanding. Vermont became the 21st state last month to enact a law that requires e-waste recycling. Twenty-six companies--including Dell, Hewlett Packard, AT&T and Verizon--have partnered with the EPA on the Plug-In to eCycling program to promote electronics recycling since its launch in 2003. Companies such as Gazelle. corn pay for used gadgets such as iPods, which they resell or recycle. Best Buy and other stores are collecting more e-waste. Target announced last month that it put bins in every store to accept cellphones, MP3 players and ink cartridges. Jim Puckett of Basel Action Network, a Seattle-based non-profit organization that aims to stop toxic exports, worries that some American companies dump e-waste in Africa to save money. "People are trying to look green, but they’re not telling you where it (waste) is going," he says. "You can’t turn over your TV to just any recycler. " He says it’s better to store an old TV than give it to a recycler that may export it to poor countries. The Basel Action Network announced its e-Stewards program last month to ensure safe handling of electronics by using only recyclers certified by accredited organizations. It now lists 45 recyclers in 80 locations. Samsung and other companies have signed on. Environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, back it. Which one of the following is NOT the efforts people have made
A. Vermont has enacted a law to demand e-waste recycling.
B. Many companies join in the program to promote electronic recycling.
C. Some companies pay for used gadgets to resell or recycle.
D. Best Buy puts boxes in every store to collect e-waste.
查看答案
蛋清起泡的原理,主要是利用蛋清中所含的类卵黏蛋白和卵黏蛋白,经高速抽打后具有较强的发泡性能。( )
A. 对
B. 错
患者男性,35岁,服用吲哚美辛10片后胃痛,今晨吐咖啡样胃内容物约250ml来诊,既往无胃病史。 该患者可能的诊断是什么
A. 消化性溃疡
B. 急性胃黏膜病变
C. 消化道恶性肿瘤
D. 食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血
E. 贲门黏膜撕裂
某拍卖公司拍卖一批汽车,其中包括本公司职员赵某的一辆桑塔纳轿车。竞买者张某在竞买中购得一辆丰田轿车。事后张某拒绝签订成交确认书。请回答下列问题。 张某主张,拍卖公司本次拍卖的车辆中有本公司职员的车辆,本次拍卖无效。下列关于这一问题的何种判断是正确的?
A. 拍卖公司不得在拍卖活动中拍卖自己的物品,包括本公司工作人员的物品
B. 拍卖公司不得在拍卖活动中拍卖自己的物品,但本公司工作人员的物品不在此限
C. 拍卖公司如果在拍卖活动中拍卖了本公司工作人员的物品,则本次拍卖无效
D. 拍卖公司如果在拍卖活动中拍卖了本公司工作人员的物品,则该物品的拍卖无效,但不影响拍卖其他物品的拍卖结果
The word "globalization" usually conjures up images of globe-spanning companies and distance-destroying technologies. Its enablers are the laws of comparative advantage and economies of scale. In The Great Brain Race Ben Wildavsky points to another mighty agent o globalization: universities. These were some of the world’s first "global" institutions. In the Middle Ages great universities such as Paris and Bologna attracted "wandering scholars" from across Europe. In the 19th century Germany’s research universities attracted scholars from across the world. In the early 20th century philanthropists such as Cecil Rhodes and William Harkness established scholarships to foster deeper links between countries. By the 1960s globe-trotting professors were so commonplace that they bad become the butt of jokes. (What is the difference between God and professor so and so God is everywhere. Professor so and so is everywhere but here. ) Universities are obsessed by the global marketplace for students and professors. They are trying to attract as many students from abroad as possible (not least because foreign students usually pay full fees). Nearly 3 million students now spend some time studying in foreign countries, a number that has risen steeply in recent years. Universities are also setting up overseas. New York University has opened a branch in Abu Dhabi. Six American universities have created a higher-education supermarket in Qatar. Almost every university worth its name has formed an alliance with a leading Chinese institution. But globalization is going deeper than just the competition for talent: a growing number of countries are trying to create an elite group of "global universities" that are capable of competing with the best American institutions. China and India are focusing resources on a small group. The French and German governments are doing hattie with academic egalitarians in an attempt to create European Ivy Leagues. Behind all this is the idea that world-class universities can make a disproportionate contribution to economic growth. This is a fascinating story. But Mr. Wildavsky, a former education reporter who now works for both the Kauffman Foundation and the Brookings Institution, is too earnest a writer to make the best of it. He wastes too much ink summarising research papers and quoting "experts" uttering banalities. And he fails to point out the humour of sabbatical man jet-setting hither and thither to discuss such staples of modern academic life as poverty and inequality. Mr. Wildavsky should spend less time with his fellow think-tankers (who are mesmerised by the idea of a global knowledge economy) and more talking to students, who experience the disadvantages as well as the advantages of the new cult of globalization at first hand. The author cited New York University as an example in the third paragraph to______.
A. show glohalization of university is a trend
B. glorify it as an excellent university
C. praise global university’s contribution
D. show global universities run for profits