题目内容
甲公司与乙公司约定，由甲公司向乙公司交付1吨药材，乙公司付款100万元。乙公司将药材转卖给丙公司，并约定由甲公司向丙公司交付，丙公司收货后3日内应向乙支付价款120万元。 张某以自有汽车为乙公司的债权提供抵押担保，未办理抵押登记。抵押合同约定：“在丙公司不付款时，乙公司有权就出卖该汽车的价款清偿自己的债权。”李某为这笔货款出具担保函：“在丙公司不付款时，由李某承担保证责任”。丙公司收到药材后未依约向乙公司支付120万元，乙公司向张某主张实现抵押权，同时要求李某承担保证责任。 张某见状，便将其汽车赠与刘某。刘某将该汽车作为出资，与钱某设立丁酒店有限责任公司，并办理完出资手续。 丁公司员工方某驾驶该车接送酒店客人时，为躲避一辆逆行摩托车，将行人赵某撞伤。方某自行决定以丁公司名义将该车放在戊公司维修，为获得维修费的八折优惠，方某以其名义在与戊公司相关的庚公司为该车购买一套全新坐垫。汽车修好后，方某将车取走交丁公司投入运营。戊公司要求丁公司支付维修费，否则对汽车行使留置权，丁公司回函请宽限一周。庚公司要求丁公司支付坐垫费，丁公司拒绝。请回答第(1)—(6)题。 在刘某办理出资手续后，关于汽车所有权人，下列选项正确的是：
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Where are they talking
Passage One With the possible exception of equal rights, perhaps the most controversial issue across the United States today is the death penalty. Many argue that it is an effective deterrent (威慑) to murder, while others maintain there is no convincing evidence that the death penalty reduces the number of murders. The principal argument advanced by those opposed to the death penalty, basically, is that it is cruel and inhuman punishment, that it is the mark of a brutal society, and finally that it is of questionable effectiveness as a deterrent to crime anyway. In our opinion, the death penalty is a necessary evil. Throughout recorded history there have always been those extreme individuals in every society who were capable of terribly violent crimes such as murder. But some are more extreme than others. For example, it is one thing to take the life of another in a fit of blind rage, but quite another to coldly plot and carry out the murder of one or more people in the style of a butcher. Thus, murder, like all other crimes, is a matter of relative degree. While it could be argued with some conviction that the criminal in the first instance should be merely isolated from society, such should not be the fate of the latter type murderer. The value of the death penalty as a deterrent to crime may be open to debate. But the overwhelming majority of citizens believe that the death penalty protects them. Their belief is reinforced by evidence which shows that the death penalty deters murder. For example, from 1954 to 1963, when the death penalty was consistently imposed in California, the murder rate remained between three and four murders for each 100 000 population. Since 1964 the death penalty has been imposed only once, and the murder rate has risen to 10.4 murders for each 100 000 population. The sharp climb in the state’s murder rate, which began when executions stopped, is no coincidence (巧合). It is convincing evidence that the death penalty does deter many murderers. If the bill reestablishing the death penalty is vetoed (否决), innocent people will be murdered—some whose lives may have been saved if the death penalty were in effect. This is literally a life or death matter. The lives of thousands of innocent people must be protected. The principal purpose of this passage is to ______ .
某化工厂建设项目分为两期建设工程，业主与北海监理公司签订了委托监理合同，委托工作范围包括一期工程施工阶段监理和二期工程设计与施工阶段的监理。 总监理工程师在该项目上配备了设计阶段监理工程师8人，施工阶段监理工程师20人，并分设计阶段和施工阶段制定了监理规划。 在某次监理工作例会上，总监理工程师强调了设计阶段监理工程师下周的工作重点是审查二期工程的施工图预算，要求重点审查工程量是否准确、预算单价套用是否正确、各项取费标准是否符合现行规定等内容。 子项目监理工程师小杨在一期工程的施工监理中发现承包方未经申报，擅自将催化设备安装工程分包给某工程公司并进场施工，立即向承包方下达了停工指令，要求承包方上报分包单位资质材料。承包方随后送来了该分包单位资质证明，小杨审查后向承包方签署了同意该分包单位分包的文件。小杨还审核了承包方送来的催化设备安装工程施工进度的保证措施，并提出了改进建议。承包方抱怨说，由于业主供应的部分材料尚未到场，有些保证措施无法落实，会影响工程进度。小杨说：“我负责给你们协调，我去施工现场巡视一下，就去找业主。” [问题]1.该项目北海监理公司应派出几名总监理工程师为什么总监理工程师建立项目监理机构应选择什么结构形式总监理工程师分阶段制定监理规划是否妥当为什么 2．监理工程师在审查“预算单价套用是否正确”时，应注意审查哪几个方面 3．根据监理人员的职责分工，指出小杨的工作哪些是履行了自己的职责，哪些不属于小杨应履行的职责不属于小杨履行的职责应属于谁履行
Passage One With the possible exception of equal rights, perhaps the most controversial issue across the United States today is the death penalty. Many argue that it is an effective deterrent (威慑) to murder, while others maintain there is no convincing evidence that the death penalty reduces the number of murders. The principal argument advanced by those opposed to the death penalty, basically, is that it is cruel and inhuman punishment, that it is the mark of a brutal society, and finally that it is of questionable effectiveness as a deterrent to crime anyway. In our opinion, the death penalty is a necessary evil. Throughout recorded history there have always been those extreme individuals in every society who were capable of terribly violent crimes such as murder. But some are more extreme than others. For example, it is one thing to take the life of another in a fit of blind rage, but quite another to coldly plot and carry out the murder of one or more people in the style of a butcher. Thus, murder, like all other crimes, is a matter of relative degree. While it could be argued with some conviction that the criminal in the first instance should be merely isolated from society, such should not be the fate of the latter type murderer. The value of the death penalty as a deterrent to crime may be open to debate. But the overwhelming majority of citizens believe that the death penalty protects them. Their belief is reinforced by evidence which shows that the death penalty deters murder. For example, from 1954 to 1963, when the death penalty was consistently imposed in California, the murder rate remained between three and four murders for each 100 000 population. Since 1964 the death penalty has been imposed only once, and the murder rate has risen to 10.4 murders for each 100 000 population. The sharp climb in the state’s murder rate, which began when executions stopped, is no coincidence (巧合). It is convincing evidence that the death penalty does deter many murderers. If the bill reestablishing the death penalty is vetoed (否决), innocent people will be murdered—some whose lives may have been saved if the death penalty were in effect. This is literally a life or death matter. The lives of thousands of innocent people must be protected. It can be inferred that the author thinks that ______ .
微信支付 
支付宝支付