Whether leaders are born or made has been a subject of intense debate almost since the beginning of time. But, with current management theory indicating that "we are all leaders now", the issue is (47) ever greater importance. In The Leadership Gene, Cyril Levicki makes a(n) (48) contribution without really coming down on one side or the other. Although he leans towards the "born" rather than "made" school, he comes up with a sort of (49) based on the premise (前提) that "leaders need to be born with a set of genetic characteristics which create the raw materials from which leadership may be (50) ." Adopting the biological terminology(术语学)that has become fashionable in the management world, he adds that "if the gene of leadership is housed within the leader at birth, the chromosomes(染色体) form the (51) of the leader’s development as a child and during the early evolution of their psyche(自我)." The gene is only the starting point, "the vital progenitor (祖先) of many ingredients that have to be in place before the creation of a(n) (52) leader is completed". Mr. Levicki, a former academic and consultant, identifies seven chromosomes — youthful energy, courageous circumspection, winning ways, balance, intuition, moral fibre and leadership itself. Mr. Levicki’s book is (53) to help more people achieve their potential, on the grounds that there are not many good leaders around. But he stresses that the "chromosomes" only reinforce the (54) that some people have that vital something, and therefore that readers should not think that just by going through all the exercises in the book they can necessarily achieve great things. He does not go so far as those who (55) they can predict with certainty how far leaders would rise in organisations but says that "you can foretell, by and (56) , that a person has or doesn’t have the ’leadership gene".A. intended I) compromiseB. large J) yetC. exerted K) fosteredD. assuming L) qualityE. notion M) personalityF. telling N) reckonG. inherited O) threadsH) courses
查看答案
案例五[背景材料]某建设单位经上级主管部门批准拟新建建筑面积为3000m2的综合办公楼,经工程造价咨询部门估算该工程造价为3450万元,该工程项目决定采用施工总承包的招标方式进行招标。在招标过程中,发生如下事件。事件一:由于经资格预审合格的投标申请人过多,为了提高工作效率,招标人从中只选择了8家资格预审合格的申请人,向其发出资格预审合格通知书。事件二:招标文件申明确说明该项目的资金来源落实了2600万元。事件三:招标文件中规定,投标单位在收到招标文件后,若有问题需要澄清,只能以书面形式提出,招标单位将答复只可以书面形式送给提出问题的投标单位。事件四:招标文件中规定,从招标文件发放之日起,在15日内递交投标文件。事件五:发售招标文件的价格为编制和印刷招标文件的成本和发布招标公告的费用。[问题] 就事件二,谈谈你对这一说明的理解?
人们自杀的原因分类很多,例如失败、暴怒、需要关注、压力等。
Kids may be spending too much time in front of computers and televisions, but are interventions (干预) designed to curb (抑制) that working An analysis of several reports finds that some do, but (67) may be needed. A. mixtures B. monitors C. mutters D. merchants
An analysis of 47 studies (68) intervention programs to curb (69) time among children younger than 12 found that 29 showed programs were (70) at getting kids (71) the television, computer and video games.
B. The interventions (72) programs based in schools, at home,in communities and in clinics and WIC(Women, Infants, and Children) centers. Some involved education, exercise, monitoring or incentives.
C. What worked best
D. Interventions that (73) definite goals for less use of screen-based media or TV watching, (74) that used monitoring devices, that had contingent (可能的) (75) programs, offered clinic- based (76) , had a lot of parental (77) , and/or included overweight study participants.
E. Studies that used electronic monitoring devices were able to (78) TV viewing from 1.5 to 3 hours a day. There were some problems, (79) ; in two studies half of the families that had the (80) didn’t use them or, if they did, didn’t want to use them again. The devices also (81) to be expensive.
F. The authors recommended that future research look (82) whether reducing screen time (83) obesity, whether interventions are effective (84) the long term, and whether taking TVs out of kids’ bedrooms (85) a difference. More children representing racial and (86) minorities should be included as well.
[背景材料] 2011年3月12日,某造纸厂发生一起因工人严重违反操作规程和缺乏救助常识而导致10人中毒,其中4人死亡的重大伤害事故。 事故当日,该厂工人于早上7时停机,经过往浆渣池中灌水、排水的工序后,8时左右有2名工人下池清扫浆渣池,当即晕倒在池中。在场工人在没有通知厂领导的情况下,擅自下池救人,先后有6人因救人相继晕倒在池中,另有2人在救人过程中突感不适被人救出。至此,已有10人中毒。厂领导赶到后,立即组织抢救,经往池中灌氧、用风扇往池中送风后,方将中毒者全部用绳子拉出池来。由于本次中毒发生快,中毒深,病情严重,10例病人在送往医院后,已有6例心跳和呼吸停止,虽经多方努力抢救,至13日下午4时20分,已有4人死亡。 事故原因调查与分析: (1)中毒现场有害气体的测试及中毒化学物质的鉴定。浆渣池外形似一倒扣的半球状体,顶部有一个40cm×60cm洞口,工人利用竹梯从洞口进出清洗浆渣池。走近洞口,就闻到一股较浓的臭味,事故发生后,在洞口处用快速检测管对洞口内10cm处的气体进行检测:硫化氢(H2S)55mg/m3(国家卫生标准为10mg/m3),一氧化碳、氯气和氯化氢未检出,可以推断,在实行向池中通风、送氧之前,其浓度一定更高。根据中毒病人的发病及临床特征,将本次中毒诊断为急性重度硫化氢中毒。 (2)浆池硫化氢产生的原因。造纸的过程中,使用大量的含硫化学物质,通常的情况下,由硫化氢引起的职业危害多发生在蒸煮、制浆和洗涤漂白过程中。如果含硫的废渣、废水长时间存放在浆渣池中,再加上含硫有机物的腐败,就会释放出大量的硫化氢气体,由于密度较大(1.19kg/m3)而沉积于浆池的底部。 (3)工人严重违反操作规程。硫化氢是剧毒的窒息性气体,在没有良好通风和个人防护的情况下,是绝对不能进入高浓度硫化氢环境工作的。但本次清洗浆渣池前,水仅灌注了四分之一,且工人在没对池内进行通风处理的情况下就下池清洗,随后一连串的救人更是在没有任何通风和防护的情况下进行的。 (4)缺乏安全及应急措施。现场调查发现用于鼓风的排污口处却没有鼓风机,连电源插座都找不到;清洗浆渣池的工人没有任何的个人防护用具,如防毒面具,甚至连一根救助的绳子都没有,更没有发生事故时的抢救设备。 (5)缺乏劳动安全卫生意识、管理混乱。事故发生后,当我们要求厂方提供有关安全规章制度时,厂方虽说有,但无论如何却找不到,不知放到哪里。如果厂里有安全监督员,并负责对整个安全程序进行监督,便能做到及早发现、及早预防,这起事故就完全可以避免了。 (6)缺乏必要的防毒急救安全知识教育。本次中毒的10位工人,在该厂工作1~5年,却从未进行过有关的安全卫生培训和教育,不知道制浆过程中存在哪些对人体有害的化学物质、对人体能造成哪些伤害。也不知预防措施,更不知发生紧急情况如何救治。 根据以上场景,回答下列问题: 简述进入设备内作业的安全要求