题目内容
（一）S市有一面积为4000m2的国有出让土地，用途为城镇混合住宅用地，拟在2007年1月1日进行土地使用权转让，试根据以下资料估算该宗地于转让日期的单位面积价格和总价格。（1）证载土地使用期至2070年1月1日，但限定商业用途最高土地使用年限为40年。（2）宗地形状为规则平行四边形，规划容积率≤3.3。宗地实际用途为城镇混合住宅用地，根据具体规划指标，确定商、住比例为1：9。开发程度实际与设定均为宗地红线外“五通”（即通路、通上水、通下水、通电、通信）和宗地红线内场地平整。（3）该市基准地价2005年公布，基准日设定为2005年1月1日，土地开发程度设定为红线外“五通”（即通路、通电、通上水、通下水、通信），红线内场地平整，商业、住宅、工业用地年限分别设定为40年、70年、50年。该宗地属商业四级、住宅四级用地，其对应的基准地价为商业800元/m2，住宅450元/m2。（4）其他相关资料如下。①该市同类用地价格在2005年1月至5月没有变化，2005年6月至2006年12月每月递增0.5%。②商业用地、居住用地的还原利率均为6%。③根据容积率修正系数表，该市同类型土地在乎均容积率为2.5时，对应的地价水平指数为100，容积率每增高或降低0.1，则地价向上或向下修正1%。④根据基准地价因素条件分析，该地块影响因素修正幅度商业为-2%，住宅为3%。⑤基准地价系数修正公式为：宗地地价=基准地价×（1+影响因素修正系数）×年期修正系数×期日修正系数×容积率修正系数+土地开发程度修正额。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Passage Three The average number of authors on scientific papers is sky-rocketing. That’s partly because labs are bigger, problems are more complicated, and more different subspecialties are needed. But it’s also because U.S. government agencies have started to promote "team science". As physics developed in the post-World War II era, federal funds built expensive national facilities, and these served as surfaces on which collaborations could crystallize naturally. Yet multiple authorship—however good it may be in other ways--presents problems for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work. For the journals, long lists of authors are hard to deal with in themselves. But those long lists give rise to more serious questions when something goes wrong with the paper. If there is research misconduct, how should the liability be allocated among the authors If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others, how should an evaluator aim his or her review Various practical or impractical suggestions have emerged during the long-standing debate on this issue. One is that each author should provide, and the journal should then publish, an account of that author’s particular contribution to the work. But a different view of the problem, and perhaps of the solution, comes as we get to university committee on appointments and promotions, which is where the authorship rubber really meets the road. Half a lifetime of involvement with this process has taught me how much authorship matters. I have watched committees attempting to decode sequences of names, agonize over whether a much-cited paper was really the candidate’s work or a coauthor’s, and send back recommendations asking for more specificity about the division of responsibility. Problems of this kind change the argument, supporting the case for asking authors to define their own roles. After all, if quality judgments about individuals are to be made on the basis of their personal contributions, then the judges better know what they did. But if questions arise about the validity of the work as a whole, whether as challenges to its conduct or as evaluations of its influence in the field, a team is a team, and the members should share the credit or the blame. The best title for the passage can be ______
银行存款日记账和银行对账单都正确时，二者的余额仍然可能不一致。（）
Passage Four Diego Chiapello, legally blind since birth, isn’t one of Italy’s famous "mama’s boys" who live with their parents into adulthood. The 27-year-old lives alone in Milan, works as a network administrator, loves diving and dreams of sailing across the Atlantic with a sight-impaired (有视力障碍的) crew. Obviously, he’s not your average disabled person--but especially so in Italy. The country has more barriers to integration than almost anywhere else on the continent. Among European countries, Italy ranks third from the bottom in accessibility for the disabled, ahead of only Greece and Portugal. People who use wheelchairs, especially, find it difficult to navigate the country’s cobblestone (鹅卵石) streets, ride buses or visit restaurants, shops and museums. Less than a quarter of Italy’s disabled hold jobs compared with 47 percent for Europe. But the biggest obstacle for the country’s physically challenged may, in fact, be the fabled Italian family. Because of the social defect that still attaches to disabilities, "they tend to keep disabled people at home and out of public view," explains Giovanni Marri, head of an employment training center in Milan that caters to the handicapped. Thus while 15 percent of the country’s families include a disabled person, according to surveys, only 2 percent of Italians report going to school with a disabled person and only 4 percent work with one. Italians are beginning to recognize the problem. Over the past decade, the government has passed laws targeting everything from workplace discrimination to accessibility requirements. A recent study by the European Union found that 85 percent of Italians admit that public transportation and infrastructure (基础设施) are inadequate for the handicapped, and 97 percent say action is needed. But the biggest barrier is psychological. "Italian companies are afraid of hiring disabled people," says Chiapello. The only way to alter that, he says, is for Italy’s disabled to do ’what he did--get out of the house and demand change. Italy’s general public will most probably agree that ______
你是国税局工作人员，最近局里打算对某市场的纳税经营户提高税费，局里指派你和同事小黄一起去该市场找管理人员先沟通下，结果你们刚到市场发现已经围了几十号商户，情绪很激动，还有人扬言要去市X政府上访。问你如何处置
微信支付 
支付宝支付