题目内容

[背景]
某工业项目有较多的焊接作业。在焊接过程中,专业监理工程师发现现场有一些易燃材料,存在火灾乃至爆炸隐患。专业监理工程师口头要求操作人员暂停焊接,将易燃材料清除出现场后再继续焊接。但焊接人员认为清理现场易燃材料不是他们的事,且工期紧迫,因而仍继续焊接作业。
该工程于2003年11月1日经竣工验收合格后投入使用。2006年1月该工程供热系统的部分供热管道出现漏水,导致业主停产检修。经检验发现,漏水部分的供热管道的管壁太薄,与原设计文件要求不符,且与施工单位向监理工程师报验的材料不符。
如果全部更换厂房供热管道需工程费50万元,同时将造成该厂部分车间停产,经济损失30万元。
对此,业主提出如下要求:
(1)要求施工单位返工更换厂房全部供热管道,并赔偿停产损失的80%(计人民币24万元);
(2)要求监理单位对更换供热管道施工进行免费监理,并对停产损失承担连带赔偿责任,赔偿停产损失20%(计人民币6万元);
施工单位对业主的要求答复如下:
该厂房供热管道已超过保修期限,因而不予保修,也不同意返工,更不同意赔偿停产损失。
[问题]
根据《建设工程安全生产管理条例》的规定,工程监理单位对此火灾和爆炸隐患应如何处理？施工单位应如何处理？

查看答案

搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈

更多问题

请补充main函数，该函数的功能是：输出一个3×3的矩阵，要求必须使用行指针表示输出变量。
注意；部分源程序给出如下．
请勿改动主函数main和其他函数中的任何内容，仅在 main函数的横线上填入所编写的若干表达式或语句。
试题程序：
include＜s tdio. h＞
main()
{
static int array[3] [3]={{9,8,7}, {6,5,
4}, (3,2,1}};
iht (*p) [3],j,i;
p=【】
clrscr ();
for (i=0; i＜3; i++)
{
printf (" \n\n" );
for (j=0; j＜3; j++)
printf("%4d",【】);
}
}

8255A与CPU连接时，地址线一般与CPU的地址线总线的【】连接。

甲是一刚退休的司法工作人员，半年前甲在一刑事审判中徇私情故意违背事实做了枉法裁判，包庇了本该受到刑事处罚的乙，对此，虽然当时甲是看在朋友之面上帮了乙这个忙，但乙仍在甲退休后给甲送上了“厚礼”，以表感谢。事后，另一当事人丙知道了甲收礼这事，便以此来威胁甲，称如果甲不帮自己一个忙就向有关机关告发甲的“受贿”行为。甲只好答应了，受丙之托，甲找到了高一级法院的法官丁，帮丙疏通关系。在甲的穿针引线下，丙给了丁三万元钱要求丁做枉法裁判，丁答应了。事后，丁担心受到法律制裁而反悔，没有履行对丙的承诺并主动将三万元钱退给了丙。
请根据案情，分别评价甲、乙、丙、丁四人的行为。

Are two heads usually better than one？ If you had a difficult problem to
solve, would you be better working on the problem alone or working on it as S1.
part of a group？ Years of research has yielded a consistent pattern of findings
shows that groups typically produce more, and produce better solutions to S2.
problems than the same number as individuals working alone. For instance, a S3.
classic experiment by Shaw had groups or individual subjects attempted to S4.
solve problems involving conceptual and mathematical skill. In every case, S5.
the groups produced more correct solutions than the individuals.
However, it was one important warning to the finding of group superiority: S6.
the groups were considerably less efficient, when time considered, than the S7.
individuals were. In other words, although groups produced more correct solutions,
but they did so at a cost of more time. In fact, much subsequent S8.
research has suggested that the advantage of groups in solving problems can be
outweighed unless efficiency in terms of time per person is a major criterion. S9.
As a general rule, though, group performance in problem-solving situations is
more qualitatively and quantitatively superior to the performance of the average S10.
individual working alone. There are a number of reasons groups are generally
better at problem solving than individuals.
【S1】