题目内容

In this section you will hear everything ONCE ONLY. Listen carefully and then answer the questions that follow. Mark the correct answer to each question on your ANSWER SHEET. Questions 1 to 5 are based on an interview. At the end of the interview you will be given 10 seconds to answer each of the following five questions. Now listen to the interview. Which of the following is NOT true according to the conversation

A. Children might see the heroes of violent films as role models.
B. Theresa say Frank’s survey represent public opinion
C. Theresa is going to interview her respondents in the shopping mall.
D. The best type of questions are short and specific or multiple choice or simple questions.

查看答案
更多问题

In the 20th century, under the influence of Freud’s theory of psycho-analysis, a oumber of writers adopted the () method of novel writing.

A. stream of consciousness
B. Symbolism
C. Imagism
D. Naturalism

Kathryn Harrison is a wonderful writer. It seems important to get that on the table right away, since for most readers, her name will elicit one fact: Kathryn Harrison wrote a memoir about having slept with her father. Back in 1997, that notoriously hyper publicized book, "The Kiss"—in which she recounted an affair she had in her 20’s with the father she had not seen since she was a child—set critics scratching furiously at the welts it raised in the culture, largely neglecting the book in the process for its lurid cover story. Skip to next paragraphIn the hubbub, few pointed out that "The Kiss" is a pretty terrific memoir. Poetic and compressed, it is not a pointed finger, or an artless blurt, but a grimly hypnotic horror story, making human what might in other hands seem merely grotesque. That’s Harrison’s particular gift as a writer; and while her output, from memoirs and essays and novels, has been of varying quality, she has continually circled around her central, obsessive themes: narcissism, family violation, sexual taboo and physical suffering. For better or worse, this is a writer who veers toward what others find distasteful; in her novels, she has found parallel torments everywhere in history, from foot-binding in China ("The Binding Chair") to the Inquisition ("Poison").The setting of "Envy" is less exotic. Will Moreland, a New York psychoanalyst, thinks at once too much and too little. His son has died. His twin brother—a world-famous swimmer—is estranged. His wife is distant. In fact, everything in this grief-stained but otherwise normal existence feels a little distant, and Will himself appears, if not precisely unreliable, then slightly clueless. In his struggle to wriggle out from his own anxieties, his remarks can seem like witty meta-comments on the narrative itself: "Yes, he’s obsessed with sex. How else could he escape the inside of his head, where every thought refuses to be fleeting and instead waits its turn to be hyperarticulated, edited, revised and then annotated like some nightmare hybrid of Talmudic commentary and Freudian case study"In the spellbinding opening chapters, Will attends his college reunion and confronts an old girlfriend who may or may not have gotten pregnant by him years back. The ex is a grade-A wench, and their run-in is a startling rat-a-tat of mutual accusation. "Ironic that she’d become a dermatologist," Will thinks. "She’d always had a personality like a rash, itchy, chafing, the kind of woman who just won’t let you get comfortable." She ends the scene (and it does feel like a scene—the best elements of "Envy" are its most theatrical) with the fair-enough remark, "You are an excellent example of why it is that people think shrinks are nuts."The pages that follow ignore this electric showdown, or at least repress it. There’s a lot going on here, perhaps too much: a married couple drifting apart in grief, tension between Will and his philandering father, identical twins with non identical faces, a patient whose seductive behavior spills insistently over the edges of her shrink’s couch. And despite Will’s agitated attempts to interrogate the meaning of his life, he is surrounded by people who would prefer that he stop his inquiries immediately. As much detective as psychoanalyst, he’s too blinded by over thinking to give in to his own intuition.Then abruptly, with one traumatic sexual sequence, these disparate story lines cohere to reveal a new pattern: a Rorschach plot, in essence. The book’s muted family problems become elements in a Greekish tragedy, one filled with the tropes of sexual violation for which Harrison is best known. It’s like one of those souvenir 1950’s pens that tilt upside down to strip an innocent cheesecake model to her pornographic double, and Harrison’s witty, lucid, poetic sentences do carry us quite a long way through passages rife with the kind of ickiness bound to alienate some readers and rivet others.Unfortunately, her consistently skillful descriptions aren’t quite enough to make the novel pay off in the end. As heightened as this hidden plot turns out to be, it is frustratingly formulaic at its deepest level. It’s a dream horror that finally feels all too dreamlike, too embeddedly symbolic to have the pang of real life. And when the villain of the book is unmasked—and there is a villain, as blackhearted as a medieval troll—it’s disappointing to find a sociopath standing behind that particular door. So rank an antagonist renders the whole question of analytical motivation moot: the human flaws of the other characters pale by contrast; their struggles seem weightless next to such grave crimes.Still. there are standout moments here, mainly in the most chaotic and unmediated confrontations: the sequences, especially, in which a waifish, tattooed, sardonic, compulsively sexual graduate student is transformed into the world’s most disturbing therapy patient. What finally marks the book is Harrison’s abandonment of the tragic mode. After a series of lurid turns that would leave most families in seizures of distress, her characters do not collapse, or brutalize one another. Instead, they fulfill Will’s deepest psychoanalytic desires, and confess—reeling out monologues far less con vincing than the showdowns that came before. We are left with the loving attempts of well-meaning people to heal their wounds. In real life, that would be a beautiful ending; but in a novel soaked so deeply in horror, it feels too much like wishful thinking. Which one is not true().

A. Kathryn Harrison’s novels are not accepted
B. Kathryn Harrison shocked people with her personal experiences
C. Kathryn Harrison didn’t adhere to tragedy
D. Will Moreland’ family has some troubles

简答题 年末,公司实现净利润600000元,按10%的比例提取法定盈余公积,按20%的比例提取任意盈余公积。经批准,以法定盈余公积20000元弥补以前年度累计亏损,以法定盈余公积 40000元转增资本。编制提取法定盈余公积、任意盈余公积、弥补亏损和转增资本的会计分录。

案例三[背景资料]某工程项目通过公开招标的方式确定了三个不同性质的施工单位承担该项工程的全部施工任务,建设单位分别与A公司签订了土建施工合同;与B公司签订了设备安装合同;与 C公司签订了电梯安装合同。三个合同协议中都对甲方提出了一个相同的条款,即建设单位应协调现场其他施工单位,为三公司创造可利用条件。合同执行过程中,发生如下事件。事件1:A公司在签订合同后因自身资金周转困难,随后和承包商公司签定了分包合同,在分包合同中约定承包商丙按照建设单位(业主)与承包商乙约定的合同金额的10%向承包商乙支付管理费,一切责任由承包商丙承担。事件2:由于A公司在现场施工时拖延5天,造成B公司的开工时间相应推迟了5天,B公司向A公司提出了索赔。事件3:顶层结构楼板吊装后,A公司立刻拆除塔吊,改用卷扬机运材料作屋面及装饰,C公司原计划由甲方协调使用塔吊将电梯设备吊上9层楼顶的设想落空后,提出用A公司的卷扬机运送,A公司提出卷扬机吨位不尽,不能运送。最后,C公司只好为机房设备的吊装重新设计方案。C公司就新方案的实施引起的费用增加和工期延误向建设单位提出索赔。[问题] 根据《建设工程质量管理条例》的规定,工程承发包过程中的违法分包行为有哪些?

答案查题题库