题目内容

案例分析题Question 32-40: Overland transport in the United States was still extremely primitive in 1790. Roads were few and short, usually extending from inland communities to the nearest river town or seaport. Nearly all interstate commerce was carried out by sailing ships that served the bays and harbors of the seaboard. Yet, in 1790 the nation was on the threshold of a new era of road development. Unable to finance road construction, states turned for help to private companies, organized by merchants and land speculators who had a personal interest in improved communications with the interior. The pioneer in this move was the state of Pennsylvania, which chartered a company in 1792 to construct a turnpike, a road for the use of which a toll, or payment, is collected, from Philadelphia to Lancaster. The legislature gave the company the authority to erect tollgates at points along the road where payment would be collected, though it carefully regulated the rates. (The states had unquestioned authority to regulate private business in this period.) The company built a gravel road within two years, and the success of the Lancaster Pike encouraged imitation. Northern states generally relied on private companies to build their toll roads, but Virginia constructed a network at public expense. Such was the road building fever that by 1810 New York alone had some 1,500 miles of turnpikes extending from the Atlantic to Lake Erie. Transportation on these early turnpikes consisted of freight carrier wagons and passenger stagecoaches. The most common road freight carrier was the Conestoga wagon, a vehicle developed in the mid-eighteenth century by German immigrants in the area around Lancaster, Pennsylvania. It featured large, broad wheels able to negotiate all but the deepest ruts and holes, and its round bottom prevented the freight from shifting on a hill. Covered with canvas and drawn by four to six horses, the Conestoga wagon rivaled the log cabin as the primary symbol of the frontier. Passengers traveled in a variety of stagecoaches, the most common of which had four benches, each holding three persons. It was only a platform on wheels, with no springs; slender poles held up the top, and leather curtains kept out dust and rain. The "large, broad wheels" of the Conestoga wagon are mentioned in line 21 as an example of a feature of wagons that was()

A. unusual in mid-eighteenth century vehicles
B. first found in Germany
C. effective on roads with uneven surfaces
D. responsible for frequent damage to freight

查看答案
更多问题

(2008四川)案情:王某(女)与李某(男)于1998年结婚后居住在某省A市C区。2003年1月,李某去B市打工并一直居住在该市D区。2004年5月,李某向自己所在的B市D区法院提起诉讼,要求与王某离婚,D区法院裁定不予受理。李某回到A市后,向A市C区法院起诉与王某离婚。C区法院受理后,李某找到律师杨某进行咨询。杨某看了案件材料后,第二天向李某讲了法院将会判决离婚的意见;李某向杨某表示,某律师想代理其诉讼;杨某当即对李某说,该律师所承办的案件85%都打输了,同时向李某示意其同学在A市C区法院某庭当庭长。李某深信无疑,决定委托杨某代理诉讼。李某因为不愿与王某见面,向法院申请不出庭,C区法院予以准许。C区法院公开审理了此案。在开庭审理中,李某的诉讼代理人杨某称,李某要求离婚的原因,是王某所生的孩子与李某没有血缘关系,但未提供任何证据;王某承认自己所生的孩子不是李某的,但表示双方依然存在感情,不愿意离婚。C区法院经过审理,判决不准予离婚。李某不服一审判决提起上诉。A市中级法院认为王某已承认孩子非与李某所生,就表明两人感情确已破裂,应当判决离婚。遂于2007年4月作出二审判决,准予离婚,其中明确了孩子的抚养权和财产的分割。王某认为其与李某的感情并未破裂,法院的离婚判决存在问题,2007年6月向A市检察院提出申诉。A市检察院经审查认为,A市中级法院认定事实不清,准予离婚的判决存在错误,财产分配也明显不当,且对李某私存的存款部分未进行分割,拟以本院名义通过审判监督程序要求法院纠正错误判决。问题: 对于李某的起诉,B市D区法院裁定不予受理是否正确?为什么?

(2004年)案情:位于某市甲区的天南公司与位于乙区的海北公司签订合同,约定海北公司承建天南公司位于丙区的新办公楼,合同中未约定仲裁条款。新办公楼施工过程中,天南公司与海北公司因工程增加工作量、工程进度款等问题发生争议。双方在交涉过程中通过电子邮件约定将争议提交某仲裁委员会进行仲裁。其后天南公司考虑到多种因素,向人民法院提起诉讼,请求判决解除合同。法院在不知道双方曾约定仲裁的情况下受理了本案,海北公司进行了答辩,表示不同意解除合同。在一审法院审理过程中,原告申请法院裁定被告停止施工,法院未予准许。开庭审理过程中,原告提交了双方在履行合同过程中的会谈录音带和会议纪要,主张原合同已经变更。被告质证时表示,对方在会谈时进行录音未征得本方同意,被告事先不知道原告进行了录音,而会议纪要则无被告方人员的签字,故均不予认可。一审法院经过审理,判决驳回原告的诉讼请求。原告不服,认为一审判决错误,提出上诉,并称双方当事人之间存在仲裁协议,法院对本案无诉讼管辖权。二审法院对本案进行了审理。在二审过程中,海北公司见一审法院判决支持了本公司的主张,又向二审法院提出反诉,请求天南公司支付拖欠的工程款。天南公司考虑到二审可能败诉,故提请调解,为了达成协议,表示认可部分工程新增加的工作量。后因调解不成,天南公司又表示对已认可增加的工作量不予认可。二审法院经过审理,判决驳回上诉,维持原判。问题: 假设本案起诉前双方当事人对仲裁协议的效力有争议,可以通过何种途径加以解决?

某投资者于2008年5月份以3.2美元/盎司的权利金买入一张执行价格为380美元/盎司的8月黄金看跌期权,以4.3美元/盎司的权利金卖出一张执行价格为380美元/盎司的8月黄金看涨期权;以380.2美元/盎司的价格买进一张8月黄金期货合约,合约到期时黄金期货价格为356美元/盎司,则该投资者的利润为( )美元/盎司。

A. 0.9
B. 1.1
C. 1.3
D. 1.5

(2005年)海云公司与金辰公司签订了一份装饰工程合同。合同约定:金辰公司包工包料,负责完成海云公司办公大楼的装饰工程。事后双方另行达成了补充协议,约定因该合同的履行发生纠纷,由某仲裁委员会裁决。在装饰工程竣工后,质检单位鉴定复合地板及磁砖系不合格产品。海云公司要求金辰公司返工并赔偿损失,金辰公司不同意,引发纠纷。请回答以下问题。 假设某法院受理海云公司的起诉,诉讼过程中海云公司与金辰公司达成和解协议,可如何结案?()

A. 海云公司申请撤诉,由法院作出准予撤诉的裁定
B. 法院作出准许撤诉的决定书
C. 法院可以根据和解协议制作调解书
D. 法院可以根据和解协议制作判决书

答案查题题库