题目内容

Saussure distinguished the linguistic competence of the speaker and the actual phenomena or data of linguistics (utterances) as

A. [A] etic and emic.
B. [B] actual and potential.
C. [C] langue and parole.
D. [D] competence and performance.

查看答案
更多问题

有条理地概述这些资料所反映的主要内容,字数不超过200字。要求:全面,有条理,有层次。

36~37题基于以下题干: 气象学家称,当他们设计出能够刻画大气层一切复杂细节的准确数学模型的时候,他们就能做出完全准确的天气预报。这其实是一种似是而非的夸耀,这种夸耀永远无法被证明是错的,因为任意一次天气预报只要有失误,就能在相关的数学模型上找到不准确之处。因此,气象学家的这种宣称是没有意义的。 除了上述题干提出的质疑以外,以下哪项如果是真的,将对气象学家的宣称提出最严重的质疑

A. 地球获取的来自太阳的能量一直受到严密的监测并且被发现不是恒定不变的。
B. 火山爆发这种矿物燃料的燃烧,以及其他一些自然过程是不能精确量化的。这些自然过程正对大气层结构产生巨大和持续的影响。
C. 随着最新的大气数学模型的不断改进,数学模型处理复杂细节的能力越来越强,但在处理复杂性细节上哪怕上一个小台阶,都意味着要增加一大群计算机。
D. 要建立大气层的理想的数学模型,首先必须确保在地面和空中的巨大数量的网点上源源不断地收集准确的气象数据。
E. 依据目前的大气层数学模型,大范围的天气预报要比局部性天气预报准确得多。

Where can the two speakers probably be

A. $ 50.
B. $ 30.
C. $ 20.

For America’s colleges, January is a month of reckoning. Most applications for the next academic year beginning in the autumn have to be made by the end of December, so a university’s popularity is put to an objective standard: how many people want to attend. One of the more unlikely offices to have been flooded with mail is that of the City University of New York (CUNY), a public college that lacks, among other things, a famous sports team, pastoral campuses and boisterous parties (it doesn’t even have dorms), and, until recently, academic credibility. A primary draw at CUNY is a programmer for particularly clever students, launched in 2001. Some 1, 100 of the 60,000 students at CUNY’s five top schools receive a rare thing in the costly world of American colleges: free education. Those accepted by CUNY’s honors programmer pay no tuition fees; instead they receive a stipend of $7, 500 (to help with general expenses) and a laptop computer. Applications for early admissions into next year’s programme are up 70%. Admission has nothing to do with being an athlete, or a child of an alunmus, or having an influential sponsor, or being a member of a particularly aggrieved ethnic group—criteria that are increasingly important at America’s elite colleges. Most of the students who apply to the honours programme come from relatively poor families, many of them immigrant ones. All that CUNY demands is that these students be diligent and clever. Last year, the average standardised test score of this group was in the top 7% in the country. Among the rest of CUNY’s students averages are lower, but they are now just breaking into the top third (compared with the bottom third in 1997). CUNY does not appear alongside Harvard and Stanford on lists of America’s top colleges, but its recent transformation offers a neat parable of meritocracy revisited. Until the 1960s, a good case could be made that the best deal in American tertiary education was to be found not in Cambridge or Palo Alto, but in Harlem, at a small public school called City College, the core of CUNY. America’s first free municipal university, founded in 1847, offered its services to everyone bright enough to meet its grueling standards. City’s golden era came in the last century, when America’s best known colleges restricted the number of Jewish students they would admit at exactly the time when New York was teeming with the bright children of poor Jewish immigrants. In 1933—54 City produced nine future Nobel laureates, including the 2005 winner for economics, Robert Aumann (who graduated in 1950). What went wrong Put simply, City dropped its standards. It was partly to do with demography, partly to do with earnest muddle headedness. In the 1960s, universities across the country faced intense pressure to admit more minority students. Although City was open to all races, only a small number of black and Hispanic students passed the strict tests (including a future secretary of state, Colin Powell). That, critics decided, could not be squared with City’s mission to "serve all the citizens of New York". At first the standards were tweaked, but this was not enough, and in 1969 massive student protests shut down City’s campus for two weeks. Faced with upheaval, City scrapped its admissions standards altogether. By 1970, almost any student who graduated from New York’s high schools could attend. The quality of education collapsed. At first, with no barrier to entry, enrolment climbed, but in 1976 the city of New York, which was then in effect bankrupt, forced CUNY to impose tuition fees. An era of free education was over, and a university which had once served such a distinct purpose joined the muddle of America’s lower-end education. By 1997, seven out of ten first-year students in the CUNY system were failing at least one remedial test in reading, writing or moths ( meaning that they had not learnt it to high-school standard). A report commissioned by the city in 1999 concluded that "Central to CUNY’s historic mission is a commitment to provide broad access, but its students’ high drop-out rates and low graduation rates raise the question: Access to what\ The paragraph that follows the text is probably about

A. CUNY’s reforms.
B. CUNY’s fate.
CUNY’s commitment.
D. CUNY’s mission.

答案查题题库