题目内容

Many people think there is no need to take special care over home security. "I’m all right, I’m insured." Maybe--if you’re fully insured. Even then you can never recover the real value you place upon your possessions. But you can’t insure against the upset and unhappiness that we all feel if our homes are seriously damaged by some stranger, our windows and doors smashed, our precious possessions ruined. "It won’t happen to me." Won’t it A home is broken into almost every minute of the day. Thefts of all kinds, including cars and property stolen, happen twice as frequently. "I’ve nothing worth stealing." You may think not. But in fact every one has something worth a thief’s attention. And we all have things of special value to us even if they’re worth little or nothing in cash terms. "I’m only a tenant here." The thief doesn’t care whether you’re a tenant or an owner-occupier. You’re just as likely to be robbed. Have a word with the owner of the house ff you think extra locks and fastenings are necessary. "They’ll get in any way." Most thieves are always looking for easy jobs. They are soon discouraged by houses they can’t get into quickly and easily. So it’s worth taking care. This booklet will help you. It’s based on the practical experience of police forces throughout the country. Most of the suggestions will cost you only a few minutes extra time and thought. A few may involve some expense, but this is small compared with the loss and unhappiness you might otherwise suffer. If you are in doubt, ask for free advice from the Crime Prevention Officer at your local police station. What should a tenant do ff he is worried about the security of his home

A. Fit new locks on all the doors.
B. Discuss the matter with the owner.
Complain to the police.
D. Increase his own insurance.

查看答案
更多问题

生产、销售的假药被使用后,造成轻伤、重伤或者其他严重后果的( )

A. 应认定为足以危害人体健康
B. 应认定为对人体健康造成严重危害
C. 应认定为对人体健康造成特别严重危害
D. 以生产、销售伪劣商品罪的共犯论处
E. 按照处罚较重的规定定罪

办理报检人员只有取得《报检员资格证》后,才能从事出入境检验检疫报检工作。()

A. 对
B. 错

试述金融在现代经济中的地位和作用。

Children attending schools located in high-traffic zones have a 45 percent increased risk of developing asthma, even though time spent at school only accounts for about one-third of a child’s waking hours, according to new research. Asthma is the most common chronic childhood illness in developed countries and has been linked to environmental factors such as traffic-related air pollution. "While residential traffic-related pollution has been associated with asthma, there has been little study of the effects of traffic exposure at school on new onset asthma," says Rob McConnell, professor of preventive medicine at USC’s Keck School of Medicine. "Exposure to pollution at locations other than home, especially where children spend a large portion of their day and may engage in physical activity, appears to influence asthma risk as well." The study appears online in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. The study drew upon data from the Children’s Health Study (CHS), a longitudinal study of children in Southern California communities that was designed to investigate the chronic effects of air pollution on respiratory health. Using a cohort of 2 497 kindergarten and first grade children who were asthma-free when they entered the study, researchers examined the relationship of local traffic around schools and homes to diagnosis new onset asthma that occurred during three years of follow-up. Traffic-related pollution exposure was assessed based on a model that took into account traffic volume, distance to major roadways from home and school and local weather conditions. Regional ambient ozone, nitrogen dioxide (二氧化氮) and particulate matter were measured continuously at one central site in each of the 13 study communities. The design allowed investigators to examine the joint effects of local traffic-related pollution exposure at school and at home and of regional pollution exposure affecting the entire community. Researchers found 120 cases of new asthma. The risk associated with traffic-related pollution exposure at schools was almost as high as for residential exposure, and combined exposure accounting for time spent at home and at school had a slightly larger effect. Although children spend less time at school than at home, physical education, and other activities that take place at school may increase ventilation rates and the dose of pollutants getting into the lungs, McConnell notes. Traffic-related pollutant levels may also be higher during the morning hours when children are arriving at school. Despite a state law that prohibits school districts from building campuses within 500 feet of a freeway, many Southern California schools are located near high-traffic areas, including busy surface streets. "It’s important to understand how these micro-environments where children spent a lot of their time outside of the home are impacting their health," McConnell says. "Policies that reduce exposure to high-traffic environments may help to prevent this disease. " The study was funded by grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, and the Hastings Foundation. We can infer from McConnell’s view that______.

A. there has been little study of the residential traffic-related pollution
B. activities that take place at school may increase the risk of asthma
C. traffic-related pollutant level is lower during the morning hours
D. frequent exposure to outdoors appears to influence the risk of asthma

答案查题题库