题目内容
She Was Poor (贫穷的) Robert doesn’t like to use his head. so he isn’t good at his lessons. His Teachers tell his Father. Mr. Turner about it. The man worried about it. It was Saturday yesterday. Mr. Turner didn’t go to work. After lunch he began to lalk with his son. "You’re nine years old now. " saidMr. Tumer. ’Whenl was nine. Histened to the tmchem carefully (认真地) at school and did all my homework on lime. So I could answer all my teacher’s questions. I was tile best at all nly lessons in class. And Miss Yang. our English leacher. liked me very much. I was her pet (宠儿). " "Your teacher was poor. I think" said Robert. "How do you know about it "She didn’t have enough money to keep a dog. " Robert’s English teacher said he was a elever boy.
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
(二) 某地新建一水库，其库容为3亿立方米，土石坝坝高75m。批准项目概算中的土坝工程概算为1亿元。土坝工程施工招标工作实际完成情况如表8-2。 表8-2 土坝工程施工招标工作实际完成情况表 工作序号 (一) (二) (三) (四) (五) 时间 2006.5.25 2006.6.5～9(5个工作日) 2006.6.10 2006.6.11 2006.6.27 工作内容 在《中国采购与招标网》上发布招标公告 发售招标文件，投标人A、B、C、D、E购买了招标文件 仅组织投标人A、B、C踏勘现场 电话通知删除招标文件中坝前护坡内容 上午9：00投标截止：上午10：00组织开标，投标人A、B、C、D、E参加 根据《水利水电土建工程施工合同条件》(GF—2000—0208)，发包人与投标人A签订施工合同。其中第一坝段土方填筑工程合同单价中的直接费为7.5元/m3(不含碾压，下同)。列入合同文件的投标辅助资料有如下内容(见表8-3)。 表8-3 列入合同文件的投标辅助资料表 填筑方法 土的级别 运距(m) 直接费(元/时) 说明 2.75m3铲运机 Ⅲ 300 5.3 1.单价-二直接费×综合系数，综合系数取1.34 2.土的级别调整时，单价须调整，调整系数为：Ⅰ、Ⅱ类土0.91，Ⅳ类土1.09 Ⅲ 400 6.4 Ⅲ 500 7.5 1m3挖掘机配 5T自卸汽车 Ⅲ 1000 8.7 Ⅲ 2000 10.8 工程开工后，发包人变更了招标文件中拟定的第一坝段取土区。新取土区的土质为黏土，自然湿密度1900kg/m3，用锹开挖时需用力加脚踩。取土区变更后，施工运距由500m增加到1500m。 [问题] 判断第一坝段新取土区土的级别，简要分析并计算新的土方填筑工程单价(单位：元/m3，有小数点的，保留到小数点后两位)。
In business, many places adopt a credit system, which dates back to ancient times. At present, purchases can be made by using credit cards. They fall into two categories: one has limited use, while the other is accepted almost everywhere. Usually the application has to be made at a bank.Once the customer starts using the card, he/she will be provided with a monthly statement of purchases by the credit company. He/she is required to pay one quarter to half of his/her credit every month.With a card, it is not necessary to save up money before an actual purchase. If the card is lost, its owner is protected. A regular and complete list of purchase received from the credit company helps the owner to remember the time and place of his/her purchases.But with the card, the owner is tempted to overspend his/her money. If this is the case, it becomes increasingly difficult for the user to keep up with the required payments, which will result in the credit card being cancelled by the credit company.Credit CardApplication: be approved by (1) .be provided monthly with: (2) .advantages offered:A) unnecessary to (3) money in advanceB) to be protected if lostpotential disadvantage:A) spending one’s money (4)B) cancellation of (5) due to overspending 3（）
注册会计师张敏负责对海洋公司2007年度财务报表进行审计，在完成审计工作时，张敏需要考虑以下事项，请代为做出正确判断。 2007年10月20日，海洋公司涉及一项诉讼案。2007年12月31日，海洋公司尚未接到法院判决。公司法律顾问依据职业判断认为公司胜诉的可能性为40%，败诉的可能性为60%。如果败诉，需要赔偿的金额为480～540万元之间，另外还应承担诉讼费用6万元。除非海洋公司在资产负债表中确认的预计负债金额为( )万元，否则注册会计师张敏不能认可。
Do animals have fights This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful, ground-clearing way to start. Actually,it isn’t, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human fights, which is something the world does not have. On one view of rights, to be sure, it necessarily follows that animals have none. Some philosophers argue that fights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore animals cannot have fights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd; for exactly the same reason, so is the idea that tigers have rights. However, this is only one account, and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people for instance, to infants, the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition, it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it: how do you reply to somebody who says I don’t like this contractThe point is this: without agreement on the fights of people, arguing about the fights of animals is fruitless. It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans ,or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another, more fundamental, question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at allMany deny it. Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.This view, which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood, may seem bravely logical. In fact it is simply shallow: the confused center is fight to reject it. The most elementary form of moral reasoning the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl is to weigh others’ interests against one’s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough, for most, to engage sympathy. When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind’s instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be enco Actually, it isn’t, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.
微信支付 
支付宝支付