题目内容

《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》第54条规定:“患者在诊疗活动中受到损害,医疗机构及其医务人员有过错的,由医疗机构承担赔偿责任。” 请运用民法原理分析: 如何理解本条规定中的“诊疗活动”和“过错”

查看答案
更多问题

某市赵某驾驶一辆大卡车在经过一个十字路口时,与刘某驾驶的一辆夏利牌出租汽车相撞,刘某驾驶的汽车被撞翻到路边,正巧高某路过,来不及躲闪,被压在车下,结果高某的右臂被压断。经交通局认定,此次交通事故的原因如下:赵某、刘某都违反了交通规则,车速超过了正常标准,高某行走在人行道内,并无违章现象。高某经住院治疗,共花去医药费等计2万元,而且右臂残废已不可避免,将对以后自己和家人的生活造成重大困难。为此,高某起诉到人民法院,要求赵某、刘某赔偿损失并支付全部医疗费以及今后的生活补助费。问: 如何认定赵某和刘某行为的性质为什么

When I was seven years old my morn was diagnosed(诊断) with cancer. The doctors told us my morn might be saved with surgery(手术). But it could also kill her. She chose to have it. The day before the surgery I was off school, and my morn planned the best day of my life, everything I loved at seven and everything that would put a smile on my face. The day began with her waking me up saying, "Kate, I have a surprise for you. Come and see." The surprise was a doll I had wanted for the longest time. Throughout the day, she told my everything that she thought I would need to know to grow up and be a good person; she told me to be the best I could be and that I would always make her proud. We had a picnic in the park, and it was so cold that we moved to the car. The day was filled with laughter. For the first time in a long time I could see she was really happy. I would never forget her smile, or the way her eyes shone as if we were the same age. It was the best day of my life, and I will never forget the conversations we shared. My mother managed to live through the surgery. Now when I look back, I realize that the best day of my life could be her last and this could be the last day I would remember with her, the last one we shared. I also understand how unselfish a mother is. What did the writer’s mother do the day before the surgery

A. She stayed at home to have a good rest.
B. She went to the doctor’s for advice.
C. She turned to her family for comfort.
D. She stayed all day with her child.

《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》第37条规定:“宾馆、商场、银行、车站、娱乐场所等公共场所的管理人或者群众性活动的组织者,未尽到安全保障义务,造成他人损害的,应当承担侵权责任。 因第三人的行为造成他人损害的,由第三人承担侵权责任;管理人或者组织者未尽到安全保障义务的,承担相应的补充责任。” 请运用民法原理分析: 如何理解本条第1款中规定的“安全保障义务”、“管理者”、“组织者”的含义

《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》第37条规定:“宾馆、商场、银行、车站、娱乐场所等公共场所的管理人或者群众性活动的组织者,未尽到安全保障义务,造成他人损害的,应当承担侵权责任。 因第三人的行为造成他人损害的,由第三人承担侵权责任;管理人或者组织者未尽到安全保障义务的,承担相应的补充责任。” 请运用民法原理分析: 根据本条规定分析违反安全保障义务侵权责任的归责原则。

答案查题题库