题目内容
某投资公司建造一幢办公楼，采用公开招标方式选择施工单位。招标文件要求：提交投标文件和投标保证金的截止时间为2009年5月30日。该投资公司于2009年3月6日发出招标公告，共有5家建筑施工单位参加了投标。第5家施工单位于2009年6月2日提交了投标保证金。开标会于2009年6月3日由该省建委主持。第4家施工单位在开标前向投资公司要求撤回投标文件和退还投标保证金。经过综合评选，最终确定第2家施工单位中标。投资公司(甲方)与中标单位(乙方)双方按规定签订了施工承包合同，合同约定开工日期为2009年8月16日。工程开工后发生了如下几项事件。事件一：因拆迁工作拖延，甲方于2009年8月18日才向乙方提供施工场地，导致乙方A、B两项工作延误了2天，并分别造成人工窝工6个和8个工日；但乙方C项工作未受影响。事件二：乙方与机械设备租赁商约定，D项工作施工用的某机械应于2009年8月28日进场，但因出租方原因推迟到当月29日才进场，造成D工作延误1天和人工窝工7个工日。事件三：因甲方设计变更，乙方在E项工作施工时，导致人工增加14个工日，相关费用增加了1.5万元，并使施工时间增加了2天。事件四：在F项工作施工时，因甲方供材出现质量缺陷，乙方施工增加用工6个工日，其他费用1000元，并使H项工作时间延长1天，人工窝工24个工日。上述事件中，A、D、H三项工作均为关键工作，没有机动时间，其余工作均有足够的机动时间。[问题] 乙方能否就上述每项事件向甲方提出工期索赔和费用索赔？请说明理由。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
某投资公司建造一幢办公楼，采用公开招标方式选择施工单位。招标文件要求：提交投标文件和投标保证金的截止时间为2009年5月30日。该投资公司于2009年3月6日发出招标公告，共有5家建筑施工单位参加了投标。第5家施工单位于2009年6月2日提交了投标保证金。开标会于2009年6月3日由该省建委主持。第4家施工单位在开标前向投资公司要求撤回投标文件和退还投标保证金。经过综合评选，最终确定第2家施工单位中标。投资公司(甲方)与中标单位(乙方)双方按规定签订了施工承包合同，合同约定开工日期为2009年8月16日。工程开工后发生了如下几项事件。事件一：因拆迁工作拖延，甲方于2009年8月18日才向乙方提供施工场地，导致乙方A、B两项工作延误了2天，并分别造成人工窝工6个和8个工日；但乙方C项工作未受影响。事件二：乙方与机械设备租赁商约定，D项工作施工用的某机械应于2009年8月28日进场，但因出租方原因推迟到当月29日才进场，造成D工作延误1天和人工窝工7个工日。事件三：因甲方设计变更，乙方在E项工作施工时，导致人工增加14个工日，相关费用增加了1.5万元，并使施工时间增加了2天。事件四：在F项工作施工时，因甲方供材出现质量缺陷，乙方施工增加用工6个工日，其他费用1000元，并使H项工作时间延长1天，人工窝工24个工日。上述事件中，A、D、H三项工作均为关键工作，没有机动时间，其余工作均有足够的机动时间。[问题] 合同约定人工费标准为30元/工日，应由甲方给予补偿的窝工人工费标准为18元/工日；施工管理费、利润等均不予以补偿。在该工程中，乙方可得到的合理费用索赔有哪几项？费用索赔额是多少？
Novel approaches to babymaking seem to be coming at us so fast that we hardly have time to digest one before the next one hits test-tube babies, egg donation, surrogacy, cloning and now sex selection. And just as with earlier methods, the new sperm-separation technique announced last week has triggered plenty of ethical concern. Only a few critics have argued that tampering with nature to avoid a sex-linked genetic disease should be taboo. But plenty have expressed misgivings about using the new technology more casually, to balance families, or simply because parents prefer boys or girls. Such choices, critics say, could lead to an imbalance in the sex ratio, with drastic consequences for society. These arguments are not very persuasive. In some developing countries where boys are more highly valued than girls, sex selection is already standard practice, accomplished by means of infanticide of amniocentesis and abortion. The new sperm-separation technique makes it easier for more people to practice sex selection in these countries. This could skew the already tilting sex radio even further in favor of boys. In the short term, such demographic shifts could cause enormous societal problems as men, for example, find it increasingly difficult to find women to marry. In the long term, however, both evolutionary and economic theories tell us that as girls become more scarce, they will become more highly valued, perhaps to the point at which more people will select for girls than against them. In America and other Western countries there seems to be little chance of the sexes going far out of balance at all. Polls show that a majority of Americans view a perfect family as having one boy and one girl. If everyone used sex selection to achieve perfection, the result would be perfect balance. Of course, some prospective parents do prefer children of one sex or the other. But such preferences would presumably balance out as well. Regarding the argument that choosing gender goes against nature: the same objection was used in earlier times by people horrified by vaccines or heart transplants, which are now completely acceptable. Every time we use medicine to cure a disease or prevent a death, we go against nature willingly. Admittedly, sex selection for family balancing cures no disease. In fact, though, no form of babymaking solves a medical problem. Sex selection, moreover, is medically bengin in comparison with most reproductive technologies. No surgery is involved, and the entire process can theoretically be performed without a physician. Children born through this process can’t be distinguished from other children. For these reasons, I suspect that as sex selection and other reproductive technologies become more efficient and less costly, they may be embraced by American families of even modest means who ask themselves, why not What was once unimaginable could become routine and the link between the sex act and reproduction will no longer be seen as sacred. Ultimately, this may prove to be the real significance of sex selection: by breaching a powerful psychological barrier, it will pave the way for true designer babies, who could really turn society upside down. Which of the following statements is true
Novel approaches to babymaking seem to be coming at us so fast that we hardly have time to digest one before the next one hits test-tube babies, egg donation, surrogacy, cloning and now sex selection. And just as with earlier methods, the new sperm-separation technique announced last week has triggered plenty of ethical concern. Only a few critics have argued that tampering with nature to avoid a sex-linked genetic disease should be taboo. But plenty have expressed misgivings about using the new technology more casually, to balance families, or simply because parents prefer boys or girls. Such choices, critics say, could lead to an imbalance in the sex ratio, with drastic consequences for society. These arguments are not very persuasive. In some developing countries where boys are more highly valued than girls, sex selection is already standard practice, accomplished by means of infanticide of amniocentesis and abortion. The new sperm-separation technique makes it easier for more people to practice sex selection in these countries. This could skew the already tilting sex radio even further in favor of boys. In the short term, such demographic shifts could cause enormous societal problems as men, for example, find it increasingly difficult to find women to marry. In the long term, however, both evolutionary and economic theories tell us that as girls become more scarce, they will become more highly valued, perhaps to the point at which more people will select for girls than against them. In America and other Western countries there seems to be little chance of the sexes going far out of balance at all. Polls show that a majority of Americans view a perfect family as having one boy and one girl. If everyone used sex selection to achieve perfection, the result would be perfect balance. Of course, some prospective parents do prefer children of one sex or the other. But such preferences would presumably balance out as well. Regarding the argument that choosing gender goes against nature: the same objection was used in earlier times by people horrified by vaccines or heart transplants, which are now completely acceptable. Every time we use medicine to cure a disease or prevent a death, we go against nature willingly. Admittedly, sex selection for family balancing cures no disease. In fact, though, no form of babymaking solves a medical problem. Sex selection, moreover, is medically bengin in comparison with most reproductive technologies. No surgery is involved, and the entire process can theoretically be performed without a physician. Children born through this process can’t be distinguished from other children. For these reasons, I suspect that as sex selection and other reproductive technologies become more efficient and less costly, they may be embraced by American families of even modest means who ask themselves, why not What was once unimaginable could become routine and the link between the sex act and reproduction will no longer be seen as sacred. Ultimately, this may prove to be the real significance of sex selection: by breaching a powerful psychological barrier, it will pave the way for true designer babies, who could really turn society upside down. According to the writer, In some developing countries sex selection______.
某城市建设项目，建设单位委托监理单位承担施工阶段的监理任务，并通过公开招标选定甲施工单位作为施工总承包单位，工程实施中发生了下列事件。事件1：桩基工程开始后，专业监理工程师发现甲施工单位未经建设单位同意将桩基工程分包给乙施工单位，为此，项目监理机构要暂停桩基施工。征得建设单位同意分包后，甲施工单位将乙施工单位的相关材料报项目监理机构审查，经审查，乙施工单位的资质条件符合要求可进行桩基施工。事件2：桩基施工过程中出现断桩事故，经调查分析，此次断桩事故是因为乙施工单位抢进度，擅自改变施工方案引起。对此，原设计单位提供的事故处理方案为：断桩清除，原位重新施工。乙施工单位按处理方案实施。事件3：为进一步加强施工过程的质量控制，总监理工程师代表指派专业监理工程师对原监理实施细则中的质量控制措施进行修改，修改后的监理实施细则经总监理工程师代表审查批准后实施。事件4：工程进入竣工验收阶段，建设单位发文要求监理单位和甲施工单位各自邀请城建档案管理部门进行工程档案验收并直接办理移交事宜，同时要求监理单位对施工单位的工程档案质量进行检查。甲施工单位收到建设单位发文后将文件转发给乙施工单位。事件5：项目监理机构在检查甲施工单位的工程档案时发现缺少乙施工单位的工程档案，甲施工单位的解释是：按建设单位要求，乙施工单位自行办理了工程档案的验收及移交。在检查乙施工单位的工程档案时发现缺少断桩处理的相关资料，乙施工单位的解释是：断桩清除后原位重新施工，不需列入这部分资料。[问题] 分别说明事件5中甲施工单位和乙施工单位的解释有何不妥？对甲施工单位和乙施工单位在工程档案管理中存在的问题，项目监理机构应如何处理？
微信支付 
支付宝支付