题目内容
女，40岁，有慢性肾盂肾炎史，近3年血压升高，晨起眼睑水肿，问 根据何化验可诊断肾盂肾炎( )。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
2006年，荣丰公司欠缴税款200万元，税务机关责令荣丰公司限期缴纳，但荣丰公司仍未按期缴纳税款。2007年3月，经批准，税务机关决定对荣丰公司采取税收强制执行措施。在强制执行过程中税务机关发现下列情况： (1) 荣丰公司于2005年1月1日向建设银行贷款300万元，贷款期限为1年，该笔贷款为信用贷款。由于荣丰公司拒绝偿还到期贷款，建设银行于2006年4月1日向人民法院提起诉讼，人民法院判决建设银行胜诉，要求荣丰公司于2006年4月21日～4月30日期间内归还建设银行贷款本息合计310万元，但荣丰公司仍拒绝履行还贷义务，建设银行于2006年12月25日向人民法院申请强制执行。 (2) 荣丰公司于2004年1月1日向工商银行贷款200万元，贷款期限为2年，荣丰公司以自己的机器设备作为抵押，并于2004年1月10日办理了抵押登记手续。2006年1月荣丰公司拒绝偿还到期贷款。 (3) 荣丰公司于2006年2月1日向农业银行贷款300万元，贷款期限为1个月，荣丰公司以100万元的公司债券作为质押。2006年3月荣丰公司拒绝偿还到期贷款。 (4) 工商行政管理机关于2006年1月4日依法对荣丰公司处于50万元的罚款，荣丰公司尚未缴纳该笔罚款。 (5) 荣丰公司于2006年10月8日主动放弃对建海公司的到期债权100万元。 (6) 荣丰公司怠于行使对金星公司的到期债权100万元。 要求：根据以上事实和我国《税收征管法》、《民事诉讼法》和《合同法》的规定，回答下列问题： (1) 建设银行如对荣丰公司提起诉讼，说明具体的诉讼时效期间。 (2) 建设银行向人民法院申请执行的时间是否符合法律规定并说明理由。 (3) 税务机关对建设银行是否享有税收优先权并说明理由。 (4) 税务机关对工商银行是否享有税收优先权并说明理由。 (5) 税务机关对农业银行是否享有税收优先权并说明理由。 (6) 税务机关对工商行政管理机关的罚款是否享有税收优先权并说明理由。 (7) 税务机关能否向人民法院申请撤销荣丰公司放弃到期债权的行为并说明理由。 (8) 税务机关能否向人民法院申请代位行使对金星公司的到期债权并说明理由。 (9) 税务机构行使代位权和撤销权后，荣丰公司尚未履行的纳税义务能否免除并说明理由。
TEXT C We have to admire Suzanne Somers’s persistence. She doesn’t give up--even when virtually the entire medical community is lined up against her. Three years ago, Somers wrote a best-selling book called The Sexy Years in which she promoted so-called bioidentical hormones as a more natural alternative to hormones produced by drug companies for menopausal women. Somers, now 60, claimed that these individually prepared doses of estrogen and other hormones, sold via the Internet or by compounding pharmacies, made her look and feel half her age. As the popularity of bioidenticals soared, major medical organizations like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists grew so alarmed that they mounted publicity campaigns to convince Somers’s readers that these alternative treatments, which are usually custom made for each patient, haven’t been proven safe or more effective than traditional hormone therapy for symptoms like hot flashes. This month Somers is at it again with her latest book, Ageless. Subtitled The Naked Truth About Bioidentical Hormones, the cover features a coquettish shot of the actress unclothed from the collarbone up. Inside, she calls bioidenticals "the juice of youth" and also promotes the questionable dosage advice of a former actress and "independent researcher" named T.S.. Wiley who thinks menopausal women should have as much estrogen in their bodies as 20-year-olds. Now, even some of the pro-bioidentical doctors Somers quotes in her books are screaming foul. "Many of the claims throughout the book are scientifically unproven and dangerous," three of these doctors assert in a letter sent a few weeks ago to Somers’s publisher, Crown. Somers adamantly defends bet book and bioidenticals. "From a woman’s standpoint, this is the first time we’ve gotten some relief in a non-drug way," she says in an interview with NEWSWEEK. "Doctors are embarrassed that they don’t know about this," Somers says. "When doctors don’t have an answer, they like to pooh-pooh it." The word bioidentical is a marketing term, not a scientific one, and it means different things to different people. To most doctors, bioidentical refers to a wide variety of FDA-approved drugs that are virtually identical to the hormones produced by women’s ovaries. They come in many forms and doses, some of which have been used for years. Somers uses the term to refer to made-to-order treatments created by compounding pharmacies with dosages usually determined by the results of blood tests every two weeks (the method Somers herself uses), or regular saliva tests, a method most experts say is an unreliable way to measure a women’s specific hormone needs. Somers claims that she is so "in touch" with her body’s needs that she can "tweak" her hormones even without the benefit of these tests. Proponents of Somers’s program say only hormones prepared specifically for each woman can meet her unique needs. But since the Women’s Health Initiative, the FDA has approved many new hormone products, including some in very low doses. While the FDA process isn’t perfect, it’s certainly better than what consumers get with compounding products: no black box warning about side effects, no package insert, no data on relative safety, no check on advertising claims and no manufacturing oversight. Somers says these custom-made treatments are natural and not really drugs. That’s just not true. Bioidenticals may start out as wild yams or soybeans, but by the time this plant matter has been converted into hormone therapy, it is in fact a drug. All of these products--whether or not they’re approved by the FDA--are chemicals synthesized in a lab. Another thing you should know: there are only a few labs in the world that synthesize these hormones. Everyone--from small compounding pharmacies to big pharmaceutical companies gets their ingredients from the same places, Somers argues that bioidenticals are safer than FDA-approved hormones even though there are no high-quality studies to prove that assertion. In the absence of any reliable research to the contrary, most women’s health experts say it’s prudent to assume that all hormone products (FDA approved or not) carry the same heart disease and cancer risks. The author’s attitude towards bioidentical hormones is ______.
TEXT C We have to admire Suzanne Somers’s persistence. She doesn’t give up--even when virtually the entire medical community is lined up against her. Three years ago, Somers wrote a best-selling book called The Sexy Years in which she promoted so-called bioidentical hormones as a more natural alternative to hormones produced by drug companies for menopausal women. Somers, now 60, claimed that these individually prepared doses of estrogen and other hormones, sold via the Internet or by compounding pharmacies, made her look and feel half her age. As the popularity of bioidenticals soared, major medical organizations like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists grew so alarmed that they mounted publicity campaigns to convince Somers’s readers that these alternative treatments, which are usually custom made for each patient, haven’t been proven safe or more effective than traditional hormone therapy for symptoms like hot flashes. This month Somers is at it again with her latest book, Ageless. Subtitled The Naked Truth About Bioidentical Hormones, the cover features a coquettish shot of the actress unclothed from the collarbone up. Inside, she calls bioidenticals "the juice of youth" and also promotes the questionable dosage advice of a former actress and "independent researcher" named T.S.. Wiley who thinks menopausal women should have as much estrogen in their bodies as 20-year-olds. Now, even some of the pro-bioidentical doctors Somers quotes in her books are screaming foul. "Many of the claims throughout the book are scientifically unproven and dangerous," three of these doctors assert in a letter sent a few weeks ago to Somers’s publisher, Crown. Somers adamantly defends bet book and bioidenticals. "From a woman’s standpoint, this is the first time we’ve gotten some relief in a non-drug way," she says in an interview with NEWSWEEK. "Doctors are embarrassed that they don’t know about this," Somers says. "When doctors don’t have an answer, they like to pooh-pooh it." The word bioidentical is a marketing term, not a scientific one, and it means different things to different people. To most doctors, bioidentical refers to a wide variety of FDA-approved drugs that are virtually identical to the hormones produced by women’s ovaries. They come in many forms and doses, some of which have been used for years. Somers uses the term to refer to made-to-order treatments created by compounding pharmacies with dosages usually determined by the results of blood tests every two weeks (the method Somers herself uses), or regular saliva tests, a method most experts say is an unreliable way to measure a women’s specific hormone needs. Somers claims that she is so "in touch" with her body’s needs that she can "tweak" her hormones even without the benefit of these tests. Proponents of Somers’s program say only hormones prepared specifically for each woman can meet her unique needs. But since the Women’s Health Initiative, the FDA has approved many new hormone products, including some in very low doses. While the FDA process isn’t perfect, it’s certainly better than what consumers get with compounding products: no black box warning about side effects, no package insert, no data on relative safety, no check on advertising claims and no manufacturing oversight. Somers says these custom-made treatments are natural and not really drugs. That’s just not true. Bioidenticals may start out as wild yams or soybeans, but by the time this plant matter has been converted into hormone therapy, it is in fact a drug. All of these products--whether or not they’re approved by the FDA--are chemicals synthesized in a lab. Another thing you should know: there are only a few labs in the world that synthesize these hormones. Everyone--from small compounding pharmacies to big pharmaceutical companies gets their ingredients from the same places, Somers argues that bioidenticals are safer than FDA-approved hormones even though there are no high-quality studies to prove that assertion. In the absence of any reliable research to the contrary, most women’s health experts say it’s prudent to assume that all hormone products (FDA approved or not) carry the same heart disease and cancer risks. In the passage, the author aims to tell us ______.
Write on ANSWER SHEET ONE a composition of about200 words on the following topic: Is It Good to Take a Part-time Job You are to write in three parts. In the first part, state just one Major advantage or disadvantage of taking a part-time job. In the second, support your view with details or examples. In the last part, bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or a summary. Marks will be rewarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriacy. Failure to following the instructions may result in a loss of marks.
微信支付 
支付宝支付