题目内容

Passage Two A proposed Russian ban on European Union meat exports could jeopardize Russia’s aspirations to join the World Trade Organization next year, the EU trade commissioner, Peter Mandelson, warned Friday. He warned that several of the 25 EU member states were growing weary of Russia’s trade tactics and could move to block its WTO bid. He emphasized that the European Union supported Russia’s WTO accession in principle and that he did not want to link the Russian meat ban to Russia’s WTO prospects, though EU states could do so. In order to join the organization, Russia must reach agreement with each of the 149 WTO members. "Issues like this will affect the attitude of member states toward signing off on accession," Mandelson said. "This is not the only trade irritant between us and Russia — there are at least half a dozen— and this latest ban is bound to affect the attitude of member states," toward Russia’s aim of joining the WTO. "We can’t have so many of these trade irritants hanging over us." Mandelson said he would work to get Russia to back off from its current plans to ban all EU animal products as of Jan. 1, which would affect 1.7 billion, or $2.2 billion, in exports to Russia. Moscow has justified the ban on the grounds that Bulgaria and Romania, which will join the European Union on that day, do not have adequate food safety measures. But Mandelson warned that if Moscow refused to hack down, it could sour overall trade relations with the European Union, which is already concerned about fair access to Moscow’s energy resources. "Russia is acting in a disproportionate way," he said. President Vladimir Putin has made WTO membership one of his key economic objectives. He is keen to improve access to world markets for Russian exports and to provide a lift to the country’s neglected agricultural sector. European resistance would add to reservations by trade negotiators in Washington who want Russia to make more progress on reducing tariffs on U.S. meat imports and protecting intellectual property before joining the world trade body. Trade disputes east a shadow over the summit meeting, which was supposed to mark the start of talks on a partnership agreement between the European Union and Russia covering energy, trade and human rights. But Poland — in a separate dispute with Moscow over a Russian ban on Polish farm exports — used its veto to stop the talks on Friday. Putin defended the Russian ban after earlier complaining that the European Commission had failed to consult him before agreeing to admit Bulgaria and Romania, whose food safety practices he called into question. EU officials said privately that Putin’s stance suggested he was suffering from a Cold War hangover because the former Soviet satellites will soon become ELI members. What can be implied from the last paragraph

A. Russia will soon suffer from isolation.
B. Russia will soon lose its satellites.
C. Former Soviet satellites resist Russia’s entering WTO.
D. Some EU officials understand Russia’s position.

查看答案
更多问题

Passage OneQuestions 26 to 28 are based on the passage you have just heard.

A delicate art.
B. An exact science.
C. A way of life.
D. A religion.

Questions 11 to 18 are based on the conversation you have just heard.

A. He’s a professor.
B. He’s a physician.
C. He’s a surgeon.
D. He’s a dentist.

[甲题] 四川泸州的黄永彬与妻子蒋伦芳结婚三十多年,有一养子。1994年起黄开始与张学英来往,1996年起二人公开同居,依靠黄的工资(退休金)及奖金生活,并曾经共同经营。但黄永彬与蒋伦芳并未离婚。2001年2月起,黄病重住院,张学英一直在医院照顾,法院认为其尽到了扶养义务。4月8日黄永彬立下遗嘱:“我决定,将依法所得的住房补贴金、公积金、抚恤金和泸州市江阳区的住房售价的一半(即4万元),以及手机一部留给我的朋友张学英一人所有。我去世后骨灰盒由张学英负责安葬。”4月20日,该遗嘱在纳溪区公证处得到公证。黄去世后,张根据遗嘱向蒋索要财产和骨灰盒,遭到蒋拒绝。张遂向纳溪区人民法院起诉,请求根据《继承法》的有关规定,判令被告蒋伦芳按照遗嘱履行,同时对遗产申请诉前保全。从5月17日起,法院经过4次开庭之后(其间曾一度中止,2001年7月13日,纳溪区司法局对该公证遗嘱的“遗赠抚恤金”部分予以撤销,依然维持了住房补贴和公积金中属于黄永彬部分的公证。此后审理恢复),于10月11日判决驳回原告张学英的诉讼请求。法院判决依据《民法通则》第7条民事活动应当尊重社会公德,不得损害社会公共利益的基本原则,认为黄永彬的遗嘱虽然是其真实意思的表示,形式上也合法,但遗嘱内容存在违法之处,且黄永彬与原告的非法同居关系违反了《婚姻法》的有关规定,黄永彬遗赠遗嘱是一种违反公序良俗和法律的行为,因此是无效的。本案的判决一方面获得了当地民众和一些学者的支持,另外很多法律界人士却认为这是道德与法和情与法的一次冲突,甚至认为有具体的实体法规则—《继承法》可依的情况下再依据法律原则,这样的判决是错误的。 对于此案你是怎么看的法律规则和法律原则之间的关系是怎样的其各自的功能是什么 [答题要求] 1.观点明确,论证充分,逻辑严谨,文字通顺; 2.不少于600字。

法律主体可以是会计主体,会计主体也一定是法律主体。( )

A. 对
B. 错

答案查题题库