题目内容
Before Christmas Mr. Smith hroke (折断) his right Icg and had to stay in hospital. When he was there. he always asked his doctor when be could go home. itc didn’t like to spend (渡过) Christmas in hospkaL Though the doctor did his besl. Mr. Sngth didn’t get buttuer. So on Christmas Day he was still in hospital. He spent a gad day in the bed thinklng that he missed a lot of hn (乐趣) on such a happy day. The next day the doclor told Igm that he might be well enough to leave hospgal in time for the New Year. Mr. Smith was very happy. He think that he would spend New Year’s Day outside hospital. Stoon Mr. Sndth left hospital and on New Year’s Eve (除夕夜) he went Io a party. He enjoyed himself (玩的高兴) ) there. But he drank too much. On his way home that nlght. he had a fail and broke his left leg He had a good time on New YcaFs Eve.
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
My father ______ (乘) the underground to work every day. My father goes to work______ ______(骑自行车).
Before Christmas Mr. Smith hroke (折断) his right Icg and had to stay in hospital. When he was there. he always asked his doctor when be could go home. itc didn’t like to spend (渡过) Christmas in hospkaL Though the doctor did his besl. Mr. Sngth didn’t get buttuer. So on Christmas Day he was still in hospital. He spent a gad day in the bed thinklng that he missed a lot of hn (乐趣) on such a happy day. The next day the doclor told Igm that he might be well enough to leave hospgal in time for the New Year. Mr. Smith was very happy. He think that he would spend New Year’s Day outside hospital. Stoon Mr. Sndth left hospital and on New Year’s Eve (除夕夜) he went Io a party. He enjoyed himself (玩的高兴) ) there. But he drank too much. On his way home that nlght. he had a fail and broke his left leg Mn Smith spent Chrismlas Day in hospital because he hroke his left leg.
1997年8月，甲公司和乙公司签订一购销合同。因合同发生纠纷，乙公司遂依照合同中约定的仲裁条款，于1997年12月3日向仲裁机构A申请了仲裁，仲裁委员会接到申请书后，认为符合受理条件，决定受理，由陈某、梁某、魏某担任仲裁员仲裁此案，并由陈某担任首席仲裁员。经过审理后，作出裁决。请回答题。 根据我国法律规定，仲裁机构作出裁决时所依据的证据，其来源是( )。
张老汉现年70岁，家住甲市A县农村，因早年丧妻，一人扶养三个儿子张大、张二和张三长大成人，三个儿子结婚后分别居住在甲市B区、C区、D区。2001年8月以来，张老汉患上某种老年慢性病，需要长期治疗，然而三个儿子唯恐花费过高，拒绝为其进行治疗，把张老汉一人独自扔在农村家中且不给其生活费。张老汉感到健康状况每况愈下，且自己又无劳动能力及生活来源，于是2002年5月向A县人民法院起诉，要求三个儿子给付赡养费及医疗费。 法院受理后开庭审理前，张老汉病情突然加重，法院为了应对此紧急情况，裁定对被告三人先予执行。后张老汉病情有所好转，法院决定于2002年6月3日开庭，并于6月1日通知了双方当事人和其他诉讼参与人。在开庭时，迟迟不见张二到来。于是法院作出缺席判决，判决三被告分别每月给付老汉赡养费150元，并负担张老汉今后的医疗费。 一审判决后，张老汉、张大没有上诉，张二在一审结束后口头提起上诉，没有提交上诉状；张三通过书面上诉状向市中级人民法院提起上诉，认为父亲在张大、张二买房时帮助了他们，应当张大、张二多负担张老汉的生活费，自己少负担。市中院受理后，组成了由一名人民陪审员参加的合议庭，在审理过程中，张老汉因长期精神紧张导致突然发病而死亡。 [问题] (1)本市A县人民法院对本案有无管辖权为什么 (2)一审法院先予执行的裁定是否合法为什么 (3)一审法院作出缺席判决是否合法如果不合法，应当如何处理 (4)张二、张三的上诉是否有效 (5)张三上诉后，如何列当事人 (6)中级人民法院接收到张三的上诉后，应当如何处理 (7)本案在程序上还有哪些错误之处 (8)张老汉死亡后，本案应如何处理一审判决是否生效
微信支付 
支付宝支付