题目内容
There is always the heated discussion about which is better, to be man or to be a women. What’s your opinion. Write a composition of about 200 words on the following topic: TO BE A MAN OR A WOMAN You are to write in three parts. In the first part, state your opinion. In the second part, give specific reasons for your opinion. In the last paragraph, bring what you have written to a natural conclusion with a summary. Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the instructions may result in a loss of marks.
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
施工质量监理案例题。 [背景] 某工程项目，建设单位与施工单位签订了施工承包合同，合同中规定钢材由建设单位指定厂家，施工单位负责采购，厂家负责运输到工地，并委托了监理单位实行施工阶段的监理。当第一批钢筋运到工地时，施工单位认为是由建设单位指定用的钢筋，在检查了产品合格证、质量保证书后即可以用于工程，反正如有质量问题均由建设单位负责。监理工程师认为必须进行材质检验。此时，建设单位现场项目管理代表正好到场，认为监理工程师多此一举，但监理工程师坚持必须进行材质检验，可施工单位不愿进行检验，于是监理工程师按规定进行了抽检，检验结果达不到设计要求，遂要求对该批钢筋进行处理，建设单位现场项目管理代表认为监理工程师故意刁难，要求监理单位赔偿材料的损失，并支付试验费用。 [问题] 若该批材料用于工程造成质量问题建设单位是否有责任说明理由。
工程质量事故时限是在施工过程中和设计使用年限内发生地事故。
TEXT A When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s amazing how little we have developed in other respects. We may speak contemptuously of the poor old Romans because they relished the orgies of slaughter that went on in their arenas. We may despise them because they mistook these goings on for entertainment. We may forgive them condescendingly because they lived 2000 years ago and obviously knew no better. But are our feelings of superiority really justified Are we any less blood-thirsty Why do boxing matches, for instance, attract such universal interest Don’t the spectators who attend them hope they will see some violence Human beings remain as bloodthirsty as ever they were. The only difference between ourselves and the Romans is that while they were honest enough to admit that they enjoyed watching hungry lions tearing people apart and eating them alive, we find all sorts of sophisticated arguments to defend sports which should have been banned long age; sports which are quite as barbarous as, say, public hangings or bearbaiting. It really is incredible that in this day and age we should still allow hunting or bull-fighting, that we should be prepared to sit back and watch two men batter each other to pulp in a boxing ring, that we should be relatively unmoved by the sight of one or a number of racing cars crashing and bursting into flames. Let us not deceive ourselves. Any talk of the sporting spirit’ is sheer hypocrisy. People take part in violent sports because of the high rewards they bring. Spectators are willing to pay vast sums of money to see violence. A world heavyweight championship match, for instance, is front page news. Millions of people are disappointed if a big fight is over in two rounds instead of fifteen. They feel disappointment because they have been deprived of the exquisite pleasure of witnessing prolonged torture and violence. Why should we ban violent sports if people enjoy them so much You may well ask. The answer is simple: they are uncivilized. For centuries man has been trying to improve himself spiritually and emotionally admittedly with little success. But at least we no longer tolerate the sight madmen cooped up in cages, or public floggings of any of the countless other barbaric practices which were common in the past. Prisons are no longer the grim forbidding places they used to he. Social welfare systems are in operation in many parts of the world. Big efforts are being made to distribute wealth fairly. These changes have come about not because human beings have suddenly and unaccountably improved, but because positive steps were taken to change the law. The law is the biggest instrument of social change that we have and it may exert great civilizing influence. If we banned dangerous and violent sports, .we would be moving one step further to improving mankind. We would recognize that violence is degrading and unworthy of human beings. The main idea of this passage is ______.
21（）
微信支付 
支付宝支付