Which description of the review system is CORRECT?
A. The author knows the reviewer, but the reviewer doesn’t know the author.
B. The authors do not know the reviewer, but the reviewer knows the authors.
C. The reviewers know each other.
D. The author knows the reviewer, and the reviewer know the author, too.
查看答案
Which one is the good action in responding to reviewers?
A. We explain to the reviews what we have revised to addressed their comments.
B. If the criticism of the reviewers makes us uncomfortable, we should ignore and try to feel better.
C. If the reviewers think that the contributions are not enough, we should request the Associate Editor to have other reviewers review our paper.
D. If the reviewers think that the contributions are not enough, we should have patience, waiting they change mind.
Which is the WRONG response to reviewers if we don’t agree with their comments?
A. We had better not to argue with the reviewer.
B. Show the reviewers that the main text is revised according to their comments.
C. If we must disagree with their comments, we should do it very professionally with no rancor or sarcasm.
D. Ignore those comments or explain what we originally meant.
In order to help the reviewers save time, we should
A. List our original reviews and the response side by side.
B. Tell the reviewers that we have modified the paper carefully.
C. Send back a paper with enough modification to the reviewers.
D. Just select some critical comments to response.
Which one is NOT the good advices on responding to reviewers?
A. We need to examine carefully all the comments made by the reviewers and the Associate Editor.
B. We have to differentiate those comments that must be fully addressed from those that are desirable to be addressed.
C. We only need to address the comments that they are correct as we believe.
D. We need to respond to EACH and EVERY point raised by the reviewer and the referee.
微信支付 
支付宝支付