题目内容

某市一家国有牙膏厂,自1993年开始进行股份制改革,职工股份占企业总股本的96%,极大地调动了职工的工作积极性。1997—1999年在政府优惠政策的支持下,该公司收购了一家日化厂作为主营产品——牙膏的原材料供给基地,兼并了一家轻工研究所作为新产品研发的依托。2002年经有关部门批准成立企业集团,拥有8家成员企业,生产以牙膏为主导的产品。该企业集团通过有效的现代化管理理念和手段,大大提高了全员劳动生产率,其产品在市场上有很高知名度和美誉度,在牙膏市场的占有率长期保持领先地位,而且市场增长率非常高。目前,该企业集团经营的产品品种有:牙膏、口腔护理品、仪器添加剂、化妆洗涤品4种产品。根据上述资料,回答以下问题: 下列说法正确的是()。

A. 该公司的产品线是4
B. 该公司的产品线是8
C. 该公司产品的关联度高
D. 该公司产品的关联度低

查看答案
更多问题

某企业由一位总经理和二位副总经理组成的领导班子,工作有魄力,开拓创新意识强,经常超负荷工作,该企业产品在市场有一定的竞争能力,企业经济效益也不错,但近一段时期来,随着业务量增大,企业经营状况有所下降。为改变这种状况,总经理召集20多个部门的负责人及全体领导班子共同研究。经讨论决定,要立即调整企业组织机构,按产品和业务范围分成 8个分公司,调整后,各分公司负责人的责权利统一,工作积极性得到极大提高,企业的经营状况有明显好转。为进一步提高市场竞争里,企业加大技术创新的力度,该企业依托雄厚的资金和技术力量,以开发全新产品为目标,充分利用某科研机构应用研究的成果,一举独占新产品地位。新产品市场后,消费者反响不错,产品的销量逐渐扩大,经市场部门反馈回来的信息,新产品市场容量很大,且竞争的潜在威胁不大。有关部门综合各方面的信息后,认为消费者对新产品有所认识,急于购买,对较高的产品价格愿意接受。于是撰写分析报告报主管领导并提出当前企业应采取的营销策略。 公司的组织机构调整之前,可能遇到的主要问题是()。

A. 决策混乱
B. 没有形成有利于企业发展的企业文化
C. 职能部门运营效率低
D. 企业核心竞争能力没有形成

《唐律疏议·斗讼律》规定: “诸部曲、奴婢告主,非谋反、逆、叛者,皆绞。”又:“诬告反坐”疏议:“本应加杖者,谓诬告部曲、奴婢流罪,若实,部曲、奴婢止加杖二百;既虚,诬告者不流,亦准杖法反坐。” 从诉讼方面看,请根据本段文字说明该定罪量刑的适用情形。

案例分析题假如程序员可用的存储空间为4M字节,则程序员所用的地址为(),而真正访问内存的地址称为()。 假如程序员可用的存储空间为4M字节,则程序员所用的地址为()

A. 有效地址
B. 程序地址
C. 逻辑地址
D. 物理地址

Questions 71-80 are based on the following passage. A federal judge on Monday certified a $ 200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light cigarettes. Eastern District of New York Judge Jack B. Weinstein’s 540-page opinion in Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. , 04-CIV-1945—which included an additional 965 pages of appendices for a total of 1,505 pages-gave tens of millions of smokers an avenue to recover damages from the nation’s largest tobacco companies, including Philip Morris USA Inc. , R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , Lorillard Tobacco Co. , and Liggett Group, Inc. The class will include anyone who purchased light cigarettes from the time tobacco companies began selling them in the 1970s. The judge said he even would consider broadening the class, to encompass smokers of all "low tar" brands, not just light cigarettes. The judge suggested that an expansion of the class could assist the parties in negotiating a global settlement. He set a trial date for January 22, 2007. The plaintiffs intend to seek treble damages. Weinstein has expressed skepticism about the plaintiffs’ theory of damages, which alleges that light smokers were defrauded of billions because they believed they were buying a product of greater value because of its health advantages. The judge also questioned the size of the class, as well as the claim that as many as 90 percent of light cigarette smokers chose the cigarettes because they were less harmful. In his ruling Monday, the judge stressed that while the suit was far from perfect, the evidence was sufficient. He said the jury system—which he described as the "ultimate focus group of the law"—was well equipped to sort out the particulars in accordance with Amendment VII of the U. S. Constitution. Weinstein declined to grant an interlocutory appeal to the 2nd U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Theodore M. Grossman of Jones Day in Cleveland, which represents R J. Reynolds, said the defendants would seek a stay and appeal the class certification under Rule 23 (f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Obviously, the passage states that the lawsuit being briefed is between

A. Schwab and Philip Morris USA, Inc. B. Jack
B. Weinstein and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
C. tens of millions of smokers and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
D. any light cigarette smokers and Philip Morris USA, Inc.

答案查题题库