Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to it. Each statement contains information given in one of the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived. You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter. Answer the questions by marking the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2.Two-thirds of Teachers Feel Undervalued, Says OECD Study A Fewer than a third of teachers in developed countries feel their profession is valued, according to a major international study. But the research from the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) reveals a wide cultural gap—with a much more positive perception of teacher status in Asia than in Europe. Teachers in England were above average in feeling valued, at 35%, unlike France where the figure was only 5%. The OECD’s Michael Davidson described these as "shocking statistics". B. The OECD, responsible for Pisa tests comparing international education standards, has turned its attention to the state of teaching, examining the working lives of 100,000 teachers and heads in 34 education systems. The economic think-tank argues that the quality of teaching, more than any other factor, determines the outcomes of an education system. C. But the report—Teaching and Learning International Survey (Talis)—shows that many teachers do not feel that the importance of their role is recognised. Only 31% believed that their work was valued by the rest of society. The report says that has implications for attracting young teachers into the profession. D. Within this average were some very wide differences. In Malaysia, South Korea, Singapore and Abu Dhabi there was a strong sense of teaching being highly respected. In Europe, Finland was the only country where a majority of teachers were confident in the status of their job. The Netherlands and England were the next best valued in Europe. But there was a much gloomier outlook for teachers in France, Spain and Sweden, where more than nine out of 10 teachers felt their profession was not respected. Despite this sense of being unappreciated, there were still high levels of job satisfaction—with a large majority saying they would choose teaching again as a career choice. E. The study provides an overview of the different working weeks. It shows that teachers in England are working 46 hours per week in term time, considerably above the international average of 38 hours, with only Singapore, 48 hours, and Japan, 54 hours, working longer. In contrast, teachers in Italy are only working 29 hours per week, with Finland’s teachers working 32 hours. South Korea’s teachers, with some of the best test results in the world, work 37 hours per week. The research includes a comparison of how much time is wasted in lessons because of bad behaviour. Poland has the best behaved pupils, according to this measure, losing 8% of lesson to poor behaviour, with Brazil’s pupils the most disruptive, losing 20%. England has less of a problem with discipline than most other countries, with teachers spending 11% of lesson time on poor behaviour. F. But a more detailed analysis inEngland’s schools shows that higher achieving state schools, rated as outstanding, have less disruption and more teaching time than weaker schools. And independent schools faced less disruption than state schools. In terms of more aggressive behaviour, in Brazil, Mexico, Australia and Sweden, there are reports of regular intimidation and verbal abuse towards teachers. G. The study examines how teachers are deployed—and whether the most experienced staff are where the need is greatest. The research reveals wide differences. In South Korea, the Netherlands and Chile, all high performing education systems in their regions, the most experienced teachers are more likely to be working in schools with the most disadvantaged pupils. In England, the trend is in the opposite direction, with the most experienced staff less likely to be in these more challenging schools. H. The study also provides a profile of the teaching profession. Most are women, with the average age 43 years old. Apart from Singapore, England has the youngest teaching force of any of the education systems in the survey. It has fewer head teachers over the age of 60 than any other developed country. I. The research found that many teachers were working in isolation—a majority did not use "team teaching" with another colleague and only a third observed other teachers’ lessons. Almost half did not receive any feedback from senior staff. The report says that job satisfaction is improved by a greater sense of participation and collaborative working. "We need to attract the best and brightest to join the profession," said Andreas Schleicher, the OECD’s education director. J. A spokeswoman for England’s Department for Education said: "There has never been a better time to be a teacher—and there have never been more teachers in England’s classrooms, with a rise of 9,000 in the last year. "We are incredibly fortunate to have many thousands of dedicated, hard-working teachers, committed to teaching excellence. Teaching is now one of the most attractive career paths for graduates, with a record number of top graduates now joining the profession." K. Labour’s shadow education secretary Tristram Hunt said: "This report is more evidence that raising teacher quality improves children’s learning." He called for all teachers to be qualified and "undertake continued professional development throughout their careers". Most teachers in Finland show confidence in their job status.
查看答案
The media have become fond in recent years of glamorizing stay-at-home moms as elite career women who have "opted out" of the workforce so they can put family first. Finally, thePew Research Center has provided the reality check we’ve needed. "The share of mothers who do not work outside the home rose to 29% in 2012, up from a modern-era low of 23% in 1999," Pew’s new report finds. The primary reason: economics. The cost of child care and the lack of job opportunities are forcing women to stay at home rather than go back to work after having kids. Affluent(富裕的) stay-at-home moms who’ve chosen to leave the workforce to raise their families often get the media spotlight, but they make up a small percentage—5%, according to Pew—of women in the U.S. These are not women whose families struggle to make ends meet when both parents are employed. These are parents who have the financial means to "put family first" by being at home. The problem with the media obsession with the rich stay-at-home morn is that these stories overshadow the fact that most stay-at-home moms are, in fact, poor. Pew found that a startling 34% of stay-at-home moms are living in poverty. The Pew report also attributes the rising costs of child care to the increase in stay-at-home moms. The Washington Post published a map last week that shows the cost of full-time infant day care in 31 states actually exceeds the cost of state college tuition. At the top of the list is Massachusetts, where the annual cost of having an infant in full-time day care is about $16,000. By contrast, a year at a public college in Massachusetts costs about $10,000. While the numbers are certainly alarming, it is a relief to see the media briefly turn away from the "mommy wars" that focus solely on the decisions of the privileged few to talk about the rest of us trying to raise families. It’s difficult to make the case for policy changes that could make day care more affordable if we never hear about how families are struggling with the costs. Until we have policies that can start to reel in the cost of high-quality child care or help low-income moms gain skills to boost their earning potential, we’ll continue to see these numbers rise. What does the first sentence of Para. 4 mean
A. It’s good to see that the media pay more attention to the majority of stay-at-home moms.
B. The media are expected to relieve those stay-at-home moms who are in a poor financial condition.
C. The media shouldn’t focus on the decisions of the financially privileged stay-at-home moms.
D. It’s good to see that the media begin to talk about the efforts of American mothers trying to raise families.
The number of people in the UK who have cancer will reach a record high of 2.5 million this year, up 400,000 from five years ago, according to a charity. Macmillan Cancer Support says the rise is largely due to improvements in treatment and detection, with 1.6 million diagnosed at least five years ago. A growing and ageing population is another factor, with the number of over—65s with cancer increasing by almost a quarter in five years. Macmillan said more people living with the disease is a mounting challenge for health services. "While it is great news that more people are surviving cancer or living longer with it, progress is a double-edged sword," the charity’s chief executive, Lynda Thomas, said. "As numbers surge, the NHS will soon be unable to cope with the huge increase in demand for health services and the support that organisations like Macmillan provide will become even more urgent and important." Macmillan analysed projections for 2010 and 2020 by researchers to come up with the figure for 2015. The number of men with prostate (前列腺)cancer has seen the biggest rise—27% in the past five years and there are about a fifth more people with breast cancer. There has been a similar increase in the numbers with colorectal(结肠直肠的) cancer, it says. The latest Office for National Statistics figures showed that 80% of people with breast, prostate or skin cancer were living for five years after diagnosis. The proportion was 90% for testicular(睾丸的) cancer, continuing a trend of increasing survival. Macmillan says that although some will recover and survive in good health, a quarter of people in the UK face poor health or disability after treatment for cancer. It wants political parties to prioritise cancer care in their general election manifestos (宣言). Specifically, Macmillan wants them to commit to increase cancer survival rates to match the best in Europe, to ensure all patients are treated with the highest levels of dignity and respect, and provide free social care for people at the end of their life. "It is essential that every one of those 2.5 million people receives the highest quality care and support and gets the best chance they possibly can of surviving cancer," said Thomas. According to the passage, which of the following statements is true
A. Most of the UK cancer patients are more than 65 years old.
B. The fact that more cancer patients survive the disease has some undesirable effects.
C. The NHS will not able to provide health services for the UK residents.
D. Lynda Thomas is sure that 2.5 million people will receive the highest quality care.
For some of Chicago’s best and hottest restaurants, the reservation process is frustrating: Customers struggle to get tables, while restaurateurs spend hours every day on the phone turning people away. The Internet has solved more important problems, but the new approach of selling advance restaurant tickets via a website opens up a smart alternative to the traditional reservation. You buy tickets to see a show, why not for sushi(寿司) The idea comes from Nick Kokonas and chef Grant Achatz, the partners responsible for two of the city’s most acclaimed restaurants, Alinea and Next. Having figured out that a ticket system is a better way to manage their extraordinary booking demand, Kokonas and Achatz are expanding on the idea with outside investors. Their new company, Tock, will introduce the ticket system. Kokonas embraced the concept because of the stupendous demand for tables at Alinea, one of the world’s best. As he explained in a blog post this year, 70 percent of diners want a Friday or Saturday table, requiring him to employ full-time help to answer the phone just to turn down most people. Yet Alinea still had a no-show rate of 8 percent. The advantages of a ticket system are obvious for the restaurateurs: planning and efficiency. The restaurants don’t waste money on unnecessary phone staff help or food that gets thrown out because everyone pre-paid and will show up. Kokonas makes a point, too, about bringing more transparency (透明度) to a tradition based on mistrust and mystery: Customers, who suspect they are being lied to about availability, make reservations they know they might not keep, while restaurateurs accept 8 p. m. reservations knowing the table won’t be ready until 8:45." Traditional restaurant reservations are based on two people lying to each other," Kokonas wrote. The ticketing-based system gives diners a better shot at competitive tables, because only serious customers will commit. Those efficiencies also could benefit diners: If everyone wants a Friday table, your tickets for a Tuesday night may well sell at a discount. The biggest hurdle is probably cultural. "The public expects a certain level of democracy in a restaurant they don’t really expect in other businesses," Tribune restaurant critic Phil Vettel told us. "In other businesses taking care of your best customer is common sense, but in a restaurant if you have people who arrive later and get seated first, the other people waiting don’t understand that." What do we learn from the sixth paragraph about the customers and restaurateurs
A. They don’t take the reservations seriously.
B. They don’t keep their promises.
C. They don’t trust each other.
D. They are accustomed to lying.
The media have become fond in recent years of glamorizing stay-at-home moms as elite career women who have "opted out" of the workforce so they can put family first. Finally, thePew Research Center has provided the reality check we’ve needed. "The share of mothers who do not work outside the home rose to 29% in 2012, up from a modern-era low of 23% in 1999," Pew’s new report finds. The primary reason: economics. The cost of child care and the lack of job opportunities are forcing women to stay at home rather than go back to work after having kids. Affluent(富裕的) stay-at-home moms who’ve chosen to leave the workforce to raise their families often get the media spotlight, but they make up a small percentage—5%, according to Pew—of women in the U.S. These are not women whose families struggle to make ends meet when both parents are employed. These are parents who have the financial means to "put family first" by being at home. The problem with the media obsession with the rich stay-at-home morn is that these stories overshadow the fact that most stay-at-home moms are, in fact, poor. Pew found that a startling 34% of stay-at-home moms are living in poverty. The Pew report also attributes the rising costs of child care to the increase in stay-at-home moms. The Washington Post published a map last week that shows the cost of full-time infant day care in 31 states actually exceeds the cost of state college tuition. At the top of the list is Massachusetts, where the annual cost of having an infant in full-time day care is about $16,000. By contrast, a year at a public college in Massachusetts costs about $10,000. While the numbers are certainly alarming, it is a relief to see the media briefly turn away from the "mommy wars" that focus solely on the decisions of the privileged few to talk about the rest of us trying to raise families. It’s difficult to make the case for policy changes that could make day care more affordable if we never hear about how families are struggling with the costs. Until we have policies that can start to reel in the cost of high-quality child care or help low-income moms gain skills to boost their earning potential, we’ll continue to see these numbers rise. What is the author’s purpose of writing this article
A. To urge the media to focus on the conditions of stay-at-home moms.
B. To inform the readers of the truth behind the media stories about stay-at-home moms.
C. To stress the necessity of going back to work after having kids.
D. To call for the reduction of child care cost and help for the low-income stay-at-home moms.