题目内容

我某进出口公司与国外某客商订立一份轻纺制品的出口合同,合同规定以不可撤销即期信用证为付款方式。买方在合同规定的开证时间内将信用证开抵通知银行,并经通知银行转交给我出口公司。我出口公司审核后发现,信用证上有关信用证到期地点的规定与双方协商的不一致。为争取时间,尽快将信用证修改完毕,以便办理货物的装运,我方立即电告开证银行修改信用证,并要求开证银行修改完信用证后,直接将信用证修改通知书寄交我方。 问:(1)我方的做法可能会产生什么后果(2)正确的信用证修改渠道是怎样的

查看答案
更多问题

我某出口公司与非洲某商成交货物一批,来证规定9月装运,但计价货币与合同规定不符,加上备货不及,直至9月对方来电催装时,我方才向对方提出按合同货币改证,同时要求展延装运期。次日非商复电“证已改妥”,我方据此将货发运,但信用证修改书迟迟未到,致使结汇单据寄达开证行时被拒付。我方为及时收回货款,避免在进口地的仓储费用支出,接受了进口商改按D/P·T/R提货的要求,终因进口人未能如约付款使我方蒙受重大损失。 试就我方在这笔交易的处理过程进行评论,找出我公司应吸取的经验教训。

磺胺嘧啶片().

A. 亚硝酸钠滴定法
B. 硝酸银滴定法
C. 紫外分光光度法
D. 荧光分析法
E. 高效液相色谱法

某市有一引资宾馆工程,有关领导部门特别重视该项建设。投资方坚持要占用该市总体规划中心地区的一块规划绿地。有关领导自引资开始至选址、设计方案均迁就投资方要求。市城乡规划主管部门曾提出过不同意见,建议另行选址,但未被采纳,也未坚持。之后,投资方依据设计方案擅自开工,市城乡规划主管部门未予以制止。省城乡规划主管部门在监督检查中发现此事,立即责成市城乡规划主管部门依法查处。试问:该工程为什么受到查处省、市城乡规划主管部门该如何处理这件事

Overall, belief in climate change has declined in the American public from roughly 75 percent to 55 percent between 2008 and 2011, with a recent rebound to 62 percent in the fall of 2011, the Brookings Institution survey finds. One noted reason for the rebound was personal experiences with warmer fall and winter temperatures.Though this kind of weather disruption is what climate scientists predict, they hesitate to place too much emphasis on one or two unusual seasons as a trend that changes public opinion. If next winter is more normal, the public may get the wrong impression about the dangers of climate change. Better for science to be more convincing.But there’s the rub. The American public is generally illiterate when it comes to science. And when American scientists complain about public illiteracy and lethargy on the vitally important subject of climate change, they also have themselves to blame.Generally, those who know the most about climate—and other important scientific fields—are locked up in their university ivory towers and conference rooms, speaking a language only they can understand. And they speak mostly to each other, not to the general public, policymakers, or business people—not to those who can actually make things happen.This is dangerous. We live in an age when scientific issues permeate our social, economic, and political culture. People must be educated about science and the scientific process if we are to make rational and informed decisions that affect our future. But instead, the relative absence of academics and academic scholarship in the public discourse creates a vacuum into which uninformed, wrong, and downright destructive viewpoints get voiced and take hold.Here’s a typical example. After the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh argued that "The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone... " In fact, the spill created extensive damage to wide ranging marine habitats as well as the Gulf Coast’s fishing and tourism industries. Long-term impacts are still unclear as scientists continue to monitor underwater plumes of dissolved oil that lie along the bottom.The fact is that today’s scientists are indeed lost to the academy. The failure begins with training in doctoral programs and continues through professional development where the constant immersion in academic seminars and journals serves to weaken scientists’ literacy in the language of public, economic, and political discourse. Scientists limit involvement in such "outside activities" because tenure and promotion are based primarily on publication in top-tier academic journals."In my view, few contemporary issues warrant critical analysis by problem-focused researchers more than environmental sustainability, and particularly climate change. Universities need to train emerging and seasoned scholars in the skills of communicating science to the public and policy makers. We need to develop a new generation of scholars for whom the role of public intellectual is not an anachronism. Without such changes, the climate change debate devolves into a " logic schism" where the ideological extremes dominate the conversation and the space for solutions disappears into a rhetorical shouting match. Which of the following is not the" outside activities" in the eyes of scientists()

A. Writing scientific columns for the broader media
B. Churning out books for commercial press
C. Serving as an advisor in government panel
D. Travelling to taking part in an scientific seminar

答案查题题库