题目内容

Passage One Let us suppose that you are in the position of a parent. Would you allow your children to read any book they wanted to without first checking its contents Would you take your children to see any film without first finding out whether it is suitable for them If your answer to these questions is "yes", then you are either extremely permissive. If your answer is "no", then you are exercising your right as a parent to protect your children from what you consider to be undesirable influences. In other words, by acting as a censor yourself, you are admitting that there is a strong case for censorship. Now, of course, you will say that it is one thing to exercise censorship where children are concerned and quite another to do the same for adults. Children need protection and it is the parents’ responsibility to provide it. But what about adults Aren’t they old enough to decide what is good for them The answer is that many adults are, but don’t make the mistake of thinking that all adults are like you. Censorship is for the good of society as a whole. Like the law, censorship contributes to the common good. Some people think that it is disgraceful that a censor should interfere with works of art. Who is this person, they say, to ban this great book or cut that great film No one can set himself up as a superior being. But we must remember two things. Firstly, where genuine works of art are concerned, modern censors are extremely liberal in their views-often far more liberal than a large section of the public. Artistic merit is something which censors clearly recognize. And secondly, we must bear in mind that the great proportion of books, plays and films which come before the censor are very far from being "works of art". When discussing censorship, therefore, we should not confine our attention to great masterpieces, but should consider the vast numbers of publications and films which make up the bulk of the entertainment industry. When censorship laws are relaxed, immoral people are given a license to produce virtually anything in the name of "art". There is an increasing tendency to equate artistic with "pornographic". The vast market for pornography would rapidly be exploited. One of the great things that censorship docs is to prevent certain people from making fat profits by corrupting the minds of others. To argue in favor of absolute freedom is to argue in favor of anarchy. Society would really be the poorer if it deprived itself of the wise counsel and the restraining influence which a censor provides. The fact that parents check the contents of the book or the film for their children to read or see shows ______.

A. the necessity of censorship
B. many books and films are bad
C. children need their parents to help them understand more
D. the parents are permissive

查看答案
更多问题

Passage One Let us suppose that you are in the position of a parent. Would you allow your children to read any book they wanted to without first checking its contents Would you take your children to see any film without first finding out whether it is suitable for them If your answer to these questions is "yes", then you are either extremely permissive. If your answer is "no", then you are exercising your right as a parent to protect your children from what you consider to be undesirable influences. In other words, by acting as a censor yourself, you are admitting that there is a strong case for censorship. Now, of course, you will say that it is one thing to exercise censorship where children are concerned and quite another to do the same for adults. Children need protection and it is the parents’ responsibility to provide it. But what about adults Aren’t they old enough to decide what is good for them The answer is that many adults are, but don’t make the mistake of thinking that all adults are like you. Censorship is for the good of society as a whole. Like the law, censorship contributes to the common good. Some people think that it is disgraceful that a censor should interfere with works of art. Who is this person, they say, to ban this great book or cut that great film No one can set himself up as a superior being. But we must remember two things. Firstly, where genuine works of art are concerned, modern censors are extremely liberal in their views-often far more liberal than a large section of the public. Artistic merit is something which censors clearly recognize. And secondly, we must bear in mind that the great proportion of books, plays and films which come before the censor are very far from being "works of art". When discussing censorship, therefore, we should not confine our attention to great masterpieces, but should consider the vast numbers of publications and films which make up the bulk of the entertainment industry. When censorship laws are relaxed, immoral people are given a license to produce virtually anything in the name of "art". There is an increasing tendency to equate artistic with "pornographic". The vast market for pornography would rapidly be exploited. One of the great things that censorship docs is to prevent certain people from making fat profits by corrupting the minds of others. To argue in favor of absolute freedom is to argue in favor of anarchy. Society would really be the poorer if it deprived itself of the wise counsel and the restraining influence which a censor provides. Permissive parents would ______.

A. let their children read any books they like to
B. not let their children see any films they like to
C. not let their children read any books without first checking their contents
D. let their children see the films with their first checking

Passage Two One thing the tour books don’t tell you about London is that 2,000 of its residents are foxes. As native as the royal family, they fled the city about centuries ago after developers and pollution moved in. But now that the environment is cleaner, the foxes have come home, one of the many wild animals that have moved into urban areas around the world. "The number and variety of wild animals in urban areas is increasing," says Gomer Jones, president of the National Institute for Urban Wildlife, in Columbia, Maryland. A survey of the wildlife in New York’s Central Park last year tallied the species of mammals, including muskrats, shrews and flying squirrels. A similar survey conducted in the 1890s counted only five species. One of the country’s largest populations of raccoons(浣熊) now lives in Washington D.C., and moose(驼鹿) are regularly seen wandering into Maine towns. Peregrine falcons (游隼) dive from the window ledges of buildings in the largest U.S. cities to prey on pigeons. Several changes have brought wild animals to the cities. Foremost is that air and water quality in many cities has improved as a result of the 1970s’ pollution-control efforts. Meanwhile, rural areas have been built up, leaving many animals on the edges of suburbia. In addition, conservationists have created urban wildlife refuges. The Greater London Council last year spent $750,000 to buy land and build 10 permanent wildlife refuges in the city. Over 1,000 volunteers have donated money and cleared rubble from derelict lots. As a result, pheasants now strut in the East End and badgers scuttle across lawns near the center of town. A colony of rare house martins nests on a window ledge beside Harrods, and one evening last year a fox was seen on Westminster Bridge looking up at Big Ben. For peregrine falcons, cities are actually safer than rural cliff dwellings. By 1970 the birds were extinct east of the Mississippi because the DDT had made their eggs too thin m support life. That year, ornithologist Tom Cade of Cornell University began rising the birds for release in cities, for cities afforded abundant food and contained none of the peregrine’s natural predators. "Before they were exterminated, some migrated to cities on their own because they had run out of cliff space," Cade says. "To peregrines, buildings are just like cliffs." He has released about 30 birds since 1975 in New York, Baltimore, Philadelphia and Norfolk, and of the 20 pairs now living in the East, half are urbanites. "A few of the young ones have gotten into trouble by falling down chimneys and crashing into window-glass, but overall their adjustment has been successful." In the 4th paragraph the pheasants, badgers, and martins etc. are mentioned to ______.

A. explain their living habit
B. make known their habitat
C. show the endeavors of Londoners to make the city habitable for wildlife
D. encourage volunteers to do something for the species

某电梯安装工程项目,由于电梯工程在高且深的井道内作业,每层在层门安装前留下较大的门洞,这对作业人员或其他闲杂人员存在高空坠落的危险,针对这一情况,施工项目经理部对从事影响工程产品质量的所有人员进行了控制。施工项目经理部对该电梯工程的施工程序和施工安全技术措施的制定如下:(1)机房通向井道的预留孔随时开通以方便施工;(2)井道安装好导轨后放基准线进行配管配线;(3)层门洞靠井道壁外侧设置坚固的围封,围封的高度不小于0.8m;(4)由制造厂组装完成经调试合格后加以封记的机电协调动作部件在施工时应拆封调整后安装;(5)电梯安装单位安装完毕自检试运行结束后,由监理单位负责进行校验和调试;(6)电梯经校验和调试符合要求后,向当地特种设备安全监督部门报验要求监督检验。[问题]1.施工项目经理部对施工人员主要从哪些环节进行控制?2.施工人员的哪些方面直接影响工程质量?3.逐条说明该电梯工程的施工程序和施工安全技术措施是否妥当如不妥,请改正。

某施工企业通过投标获得了某机电安装工程的施工总承包任务,该施工企业中标后的第10天与业主签订了固定总价机电安装施工总承包合同。随后,该施工企业将部分主体工程分包给具有相应资质条件的分包人,并签订了分包合同。施工总承包合同中约定的合同工期为380天,而依施工预算定额该工程工期应为360天。在合同履行过程中,施工总承包单位发现施工图设计文件中提供的某些工程尺寸有误,遂提出更正。[问题]1.按承包工程的范围不同可将工程承包合同分为哪几类?2.该工程中的分包合同是否成立为什么?3.该工程的实际工期为多少天为什么?4.订立工程承包合同应遵循的原则是什么?5.如果该工程的工程量增加,那么施工总承包合同的合同价格应如何调整该工程中的工程量风险和价格风险由谁来承担6.简述工程承包合同的变更程序。

答案查题题库