题目内容
“给定材料3”中提到“北京城不会得感冒，但是总有一天它的交通会得心脏病。”假设你是城市规划局的一名工作人员，根据“给定资料3-4”，请你针对这一问题提出建议。 [要求] 条理清楚，具体简明，有针对性，不超过300字。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
根据给定材料，概括城市交通拥堵严重的原因。 [要求] 概括准确、语言简练，不超过150字。
根据给定材料，围绕“交通拥堵”，自选角度，自拟题目，写一篇文章。 [要求] 1．中心论点明确 2．内容充实，结构完整，有说服力 3．语言流畅，1000字左右。
已知sinα＞sinβ，那么下列命题成立的是（）。
案例分析题Despite the brouhaha (骚动) over stolen e-mails from the University of East Anglia, the science of climate change is well enough established by now that we can move on to the essential question: what’s the damage going to be The total bill, if emissions are left unchecked, could reach 20 percent of annual per capita income, says Nicholas Stern, the British economist who led an influential Whitehall-sponsored study. William Nordhaus, a Yale economist, puts his "best guess" at 2.5 percent of yearly global GDP. And according to Dutch economist Richard Tol, the economic impact of a century’s worth of climate change is "relatively small" and "comparable to the impact of one or two years of economic growth." These estimates aren’t just different—they’re different by an order of magnitude. And while some might dismiss the cost estimates as mere intellectual exercises, they’re intellectual exercises with real impact. The Copenhagen meeting may be a bust, but countries from the United States to China are individually considering cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes, and other policies aimed at curtailing greenhouse gases. To be effective, a tax or cap-and-trade charge would have to force today’s emitters to pay the true "social cost of carbon"—in other words, the amount of damage a ton of carbon will cause in the coming centuries. Figuring out what that cost is, however, is no simple task. That’s largely because most of the bill won’t come due for many decades. A ton of carbon dioxide emitted today will linger in the air for anywhere from one to five centuries. Virtually every cost study shows that, even if economic growth continues apace (快速地) and there’s no effort to slash emissions, the damage from climate change will be negligible until at least 2075. It could take 100 years before we see noticeably negative effects, and even more before we need to launch massive construction projects to mitigate (减轻) the damage. What can we learn from the first paragraph
微信支付 
支付宝支付