1 was only about six that he held his hand 46. out to me.I took it in me and we walked.Then 47. I ask him,“Grandpa,how come you have 48. SO much lines on your hand’’He laughed and 49. said,“Well,that’S a big question!”He was 50. silent for a moment.So he answered slowly, 51. “Each these lines stands for a trouble in my 52. life.”I looked at his other hands.“But Grandpa,53. what do you have more lines on that one” 54. “Because there are more the honors and joys 55. in my life.” (46)处填入()
查看答案
简答题 英美法系国家实行判例法制度,法官的判决本身具有立法的意义,并对以后处理类似案件具有拘束力。我国主要以成文法律及司法解释作为审判案件的依据,同时最高人民法院也通过公布案例指导审判实践。请围绕“判例、案例与司法解释”谈谈你的看法。答题要求:1.在分析、比较、评价的基础上,提出观点并运用法学知识阐述理由;2.说理清楚,逻辑严谨,语言流畅,表达准确;3.字数不少于500字。
Questions 27 and 28 are based on the following news. At the end of the news item, you will be given 10 seconds to answer the questions. Now, listen to the news. The news item is mainly about a joint venture between ()
A. a US company and a UK company.
B. a Swiss company and a UK company.
C. two Taiwanese companies.
D. a mainland company and a US company.
C Learning l-low to Learn$22 Children who read this book show great interest in study.Many pictures will help them an-derstand it easily and quickly. The Basic Study Guidebook$36 Read this book and learn:What the three barriers(障碍)to study are and what to do about them What to do if you are tired of a subject Children read it to improve the ability to study. How to Use a Dictionary Pict-lre Book for Children$35Read this book and leal’n:How to look up words in a dictionaryWhat the different marks in a dictionary meanHow to use a dictionary to pronounce words correctlyBuy this book and help children unlock their education.What’S more,you’11 just pay 60%for itbefore May l0,2009. Many pictures in the book“Learning How to Learn”can () .
A. make children read slowly
B. make children understand the book easily
C. make the book boring
D. make children draw beautifully
案例分析题案情:国有企业川南商业大楼于1998年拟定改制计划:将资产评估后作价150万元出售,其中105万元出售给管理层人虽(共4人),45万元出售给其余45名职工,将企业改制为川南百货有限公司,注册资本150万元。该改制计划于同年12月经有关部门批准实施。原管理层人员宋某认购45万元,李某、王某、周某各认购20万元,其余职工各认购1万元。公司成立后,分别向各认购人签发了出资证明书。公司设立股东会、董事会、监事会,宋某任公司董事长兼总经理,李某、王某为公司董事,周某任监事会主席兼财务负责人。2001年,公司召开董事会,决定将注册资本增加为300万元,周某列席了董事会,并表示同意。会后,董事会下发文件称:本次增资计划经具有公司2/3以上表决权的股东表决通过,可以实施。同年4月,公司注册资本增加为300万元。增加部分的注册资本除少数职工认购了30万元外,其余120万元由宋某、周某、李某、王某平均认购,此次增资进行了工商登记。同年10月,王某与其妻蓝某协议离婚,蓝某要求王某补偿25万元。王某遂将其所持股权的50%根据协议抵偿给蓝某,董事会批准了该协议。2003年5月,川南公司因涉嫌偷税被立案侦查。侦查发现:除王某外,宋某、周某、李某在1998年改制时所获得的股权均是挪用原川南商业大楼的资金购买,且2001年公司增资时,宋某、周某、李某、王某四人均未实际出资,而是以公司新建办公楼评估后资产作为增资资本,并分别记于个人名下。同时查明,偷税事项未经过股东会讨论,而是董事会为了公司利益在征得周某同意后决定实施的。后法院判决该公司偷税罪成立,判处公司罚金140万元,宋某等亦分别被判处相应的刑罚。问题: 川南公司董事会的增资决议和公司的增资行为是否有效?为什么?