题目内容

魏某、梁某、张某三人达成一书面合伙协议,约定各自出资2万元,共6万元,开立一家小饭馆,并按出资比例平均分配盈余,分担亏损。该饭馆取名"顺通饭庄",2003年1月经核准注册,取得营业执照,开始营业。到2003年底,因经营管理不善,顺通饭庄负债累累,欠金星装修公司4万元钱尚未偿还。此时张某提出退伙,魏某、梁某二人不同意。张某于2004年2月提走其出资2万元,自行退出。魏、梁二人继续经营顺通饭庄。2004年9月,魏、梁二人为了增加菜的花样,招揽食客,于是想招聘四川名厨,推出四川火锅系列,但资金不足。于是魏、梁二人向王某提出借款2万元,2005年1月1日归还。王某同意借款,但提出一条件,若饭庄盈利后,魏、梁二人除还本付息外,还应将所得利润分与其一份;若不盈利,魏、梁二人则届时还本付息。推出四川火锅系列后,饭庄并未盈利,亏损仍然继续,到年底,又亏损了1万元。 2005年1月,金星装修公司因向顺通饭庄索债不成,便诉至法院,同时王某也因魏、梁二人不能届时还本付息,向法院提起诉讼。法院对此进行合并审理。 问题: 被告方张某认为,自己已于2003年底退伙,故顺通饭庄所欠全部债务应由魏某、梁某承担。张某的辩称有理由吗为什么

查看答案
更多问题

[听力原文] 6-8W: Oh ,look at these two watches ,aren’t they lovelyM: Which one do you likeW: They are both very nice. I think I like...M: Do you like this oneW: Mm, yes, but I think I like that one better. It’s made of gold, isn’t it And look at the rings! Now, they’re lovely.M: Mm, I don’t know. I think I like those better, over there, the plain gold ones.W: But these are gold, they are white gold.M: Look, which one do you likeW: I think I like that one. Do you want to buy it for me What are the man and woman looking at()

A. Watches and rings.
B. Clocks and rings.
C. Watches and bags.
D. Rings.

[听力原文] 6-8W: Oh ,look at these two watches ,aren’t they lovelyM: Which one do you likeW: They are both very nice. I think I like...M: Do you like this oneW: Mm, yes, but I think I like that one better. It’s made of gold, isn’t it And look at the rings! Now, they’re lovely.M: Mm, I don’t know. I think I like those better, over there, the plain gold ones.W: But these are gold, they are white gold.M: Look, which one do you likeW: I think I like that one. Do you want to buy it for me Where does the conversation most probably take place()

A. In a bookstore.
B. In a park.
C. At school.
D. In a window-shopping.

He appears (interest)()in the sports news on the back page of his paper.

某日晚,刘某带着5岁的女儿亮亮去家附近新落成的大型仓储式超市购物。刚进店门,“偷一罚十”的醒目警示牌便映入眼帘。刘某带着女儿选好要买的商品,结完账向外走时,被店内保安人员拦住。保安人员指着亮亮手里拿着的巧克力问到“这盒巧克力没付钱吧”刘某吃了一惊,连声道歉,准备回收款台付钱,保安人员拦住她,指着“偷一罚十”的警示牌,要其交200元罚款,并当场出具了200元的罚款单。刘某被迫交了罚款后,向人民法院提起了行政诉讼。法院以超市作为不具有管理公共事务职能的企业,不可能成为法律、法规授权的组织和行政机关委托的组织。因此,不具有行政处罚权,更无权以店堂告示的方式来设定罚款。张某主观上没有偷窃的故意,客观上也没有偷窃的行为,巧克力是她5岁的女儿在她不知道的情况下拿的,而亮亮属无行为能力人,不承担法律责任。因此,刘某的行为不是偷窃,不应受到处罚。超市应当返还罚款,并向刘某赔礼道歉。 问题:请谈谈你对行政处罚的设定权与实施权的认识。 答题要求: 1、运用掌握的法学和社会知识阐释你的观点和理由; 2、说理充分,逻辑严谨,语言流畅,表达准确; 3、字数不少于500字。

答案查题题库