题目内容

Halfway through the semester in his market research course at Roanoke College last fall, only moments after announcing a policy of zero tolerance for cellphone use in the classroom, Prof. Ali Nazemi heard a ring. Then he spotted a young man named Neil Noland fumbling with his phone, trying to turn it off before being caught. "Nell, can I see that phone" Professor Nazemi said, more in a command than a question. The student surrendered it. Professor Nazemi opened his briefcase, produced a hammer and proceeded to smash the offending device. Throughout the classroom, student faces went ashen. "How am I going to call my Morn now" Neil asked. As Professor Nazemi refused to answer, a classmate offered, "Dude, you can sue. " One thing we should be clear about was the episode in his classroom had been plotted and scripted ahead of time, with Nell Noland part of the charade all along. The phone was an extra of his mother’s, its service contract long expired. Professor Nazemi, in a telephone interview last week, attested to the exasperation of countless teachers and professors in the computer era. Their permanent war of attrition with defiantly inattentive students has escalated from the pursuit of pigtail-pulling, spitball-lobbing and notebook-doodling to a high-tech arsenal of laptops, cellphones Blackberries and the like. The poor school teacher or master or master now must compete with texting, instant- messaging, Facebook, eBay, YouTube, Addictinggames. Corn and other poxes(瘟疫,灾难)on pedagogy. "There are certain lines you shouldn’t cross," the professor said. If you start tolerating this stuff, it becomes the norm. "The more you give, the more they take. Multitasking is good, but I want them to do more tasking in my class. " All the advances schools and colleges have made to supposedly enhance learning— supplying students with laptops, equipping computer labs, creating wireless networks— have insteadenabled distraction. Perhaps attendance records should include a new category: present but otherwise engaged. "I am so tired of that excuse," said Professor Bugeja, may he live a long and fruitful life. "The idea that subject matter is boring is truly relative. Boring as opposed to what Buying shoes on eBay The fact is, we’re not here to entertain. We are here to stimulate the life of the mind. " "Education requires contemplation," he continued. "It requires critical thinking. What we may be doing now is training a generation of air-traffic controllers rather than scholars. And I do know I’m going to lose. " Not, one can only hope, without fight. In the end, as science-fiction writers have prophesied for years, the technology is bound to outwit the fallible human. What teacher or professor can possibly police a room full of determined goof-offs(游手好闲者)while also delivering an engaging lesson All the advances schools and colleges have made to supposedly enhance learning— supplying students with laptops, equipping computer labs, creating wireless networks— have insteadenabled distraction. Perhaps attendance records should include a new category: present but otherwise engaged.

查看答案
更多问题

案例分析题Many people believe they should drink eight glasses of water a day. That is (41) they have been told all their life. (42) a new report says people should drink as (43) water as they feel like drinking. The report does not (44) people how many glasses of water to drink. Instead, (45) says women should get about 2.7 litres (升) of water a day, (46) that men should get about 3.7 litres. In each (47) , that is more than eight glasses. As you might (48) , the report says people need to drink more water (49) they are doing physical (体力的) work. The same is true of those who live in hot weather. These people could need much more water (50) others. 42()。

A. So
B. Even
C. But

What is Peter asking Mary to do()

A. Come to his birthday party.
B. Make a telephone call to him.
C. Tell him what the date is next Saturday.

Halfway through the semester in his market research course at Roanoke College last fall, only moments after announcing a policy of zero tolerance for cellphone use in the classroom, Prof. Ali Nazemi heard a ring. Then he spotted a young man named Neil Noland fumbling with his phone, trying to turn it off before being caught. "Nell, can I see that phone" Professor Nazemi said, more in a command than a question. The student surrendered it. Professor Nazemi opened his briefcase, produced a hammer and proceeded to smash the offending device. Throughout the classroom, student faces went ashen. "How am I going to call my Morn now" Neil asked. As Professor Nazemi refused to answer, a classmate offered, "Dude, you can sue. " One thing we should be clear about was the episode in his classroom had been plotted and scripted ahead of time, with Nell Noland part of the charade all along. The phone was an extra of his mother’s, its service contract long expired. Professor Nazemi, in a telephone interview last week, attested to the exasperation of countless teachers and professors in the computer era. Their permanent war of attrition with defiantly inattentive students has escalated from the pursuit of pigtail-pulling, spitball-lobbing and notebook-doodling to a high-tech arsenal of laptops, cellphones Blackberries and the like. The poor school teacher or master or master now must compete with texting, instant- messaging, Facebook, eBay, YouTube, Addictinggames. Corn and other poxes(瘟疫,灾难)on pedagogy. "There are certain lines you shouldn’t cross," the professor said. If you start tolerating this stuff, it becomes the norm. "The more you give, the more they take. Multitasking is good, but I want them to do more tasking in my class. " All the advances schools and colleges have made to supposedly enhance learning— supplying students with laptops, equipping computer labs, creating wireless networks— have insteadenabled distraction. Perhaps attendance records should include a new category: present but otherwise engaged. "I am so tired of that excuse," said Professor Bugeja, may he live a long and fruitful life. "The idea that subject matter is boring is truly relative. Boring as opposed to what Buying shoes on eBay The fact is, we’re not here to entertain. We are here to stimulate the life of the mind. " "Education requires contemplation," he continued. "It requires critical thinking. What we may be doing now is training a generation of air-traffic controllers rather than scholars. And I do know I’m going to lose. " Not, one can only hope, without fight. In the end, as science-fiction writers have prophesied for years, the technology is bound to outwit the fallible human. What teacher or professor can possibly police a room full of determined goof-offs(游手好闲者)while also delivering an engaging lesson Halfway through the semester in his market research course at Roanoke College last fall, only moments after announcing a policy of zero tolerance for cellphone use in the classroom, Prof. Ali Nazemi heard a ring.

The idea of humanoid robots is not new. They have been part of the imaginative landscape ever since Karl Capek, a Czech writer, first dreamed them up for his 1921 play "Possum’s Universal Robots". (The word "robot" comes from the Czech word for drugery, robota. ) Since then. Hollywood has produced countless variations on the theme, from the sultry False Myria in Fritz Lang’s silent masterpiece "Metropolis" to the withering C3PO in "Star Wars" and the ruthless assassin of "Terminator". Humanoid robots have walked into our collective subconscious, coloring our views of the future. But now Japan’s industrial giants are spending billions of yen to make such robots a reality Their new humanoids represent impressive feats of engineering: when Honda introduced Asimo, a four-foot robot that had been in development for some 15 years, it walked so fluidly that its white articulated exterior seemed to conceal a human. Honda continues to make the machine faster, friendlier and more agile. Last October, when Asimo was inducted into the Robot Hall of Fame in Pittsburgh, it walked onto the stage and accepted its own plaque. At two and a half feet tall, Sony’s QRIO is smaller and more toy-like than Asimo. It walks, understands a small number of voice commands, and can navigate on its own. If it falls over, it gets up and resumes where it left off. It can even connect wirelessly to the Internet and broadcast what its camera eyes can see. In 2003, Sony demonsrated an upgraded QRIO that could run. Honda responded last December with a version of Asimo that runs at twice the speed. In 2004, Toyota joined the fray with its own family of robots, called Partner, one of which is a four-foot humanoid that plays the trumpet. Its fingers work the instrument’s valves, and it has mechanical lungs and artificial lips. Toyota hopes to offer a commercial version of the robot by 2010. This month, 50 Partner robots will act as guides at Expo 2005 In Aichi, Japan. Despite their sudden proliferation, however, humanoids are still a mechanical minority. Most of the world’s robots are faceless, footless and mute. They are bolted to the floors of factories, stamping out car parts or welding pieces of metal, making more machines. According to the United Nations, business orders for industrial robots jumped 18% in the first half of 2004. They may soon be outnumbered by domestic robots, such as self-navigating vacuum cleaners, lawn mowers and window washers, which are selling fast. But neither industrial nor domestic robots are humanoid. Judging from the context, this passage is probably written ______.

A. in 2004
B. in 2005
C. between 2003 and 2004
D. between 2004 and 2005

答案查题题库