题目内容

You are the secretary of Mr. Johnson, the managing director. Mr. Johnson wants you to introduce the newly developed computer hardware system on an international computer exhibition in Singapore next week. You would like to take 150 brochures and three sample printers with you. Write a memo to Mr. Henry Cross, the Sales Manager. Ask for his permission to take these items; Explain why you want them. Mention the date when you want them.

查看答案
更多问题

男性,65岁,有便秘多年。近半年来站立时发现阴囊部位出现肿块,呈梨形,平卧时可还纳。体检发现外环扩大,压迫内环嘱患者咳嗽,指尖有冲击感,平卧回纳肿块后,手指压迫内环处,站立咳嗽,肿块不再出现。 医生决定为该患者行疝修补术,为避免术后疾病复发,术前准备中最重要的是()

A. 灌肠
B. 备皮
C. 排尿
D. 治疗便秘
E. 麻醉前用药

案例分析题C is sometimes referred to as a ’high -level () language’. Some people think that’s an insult, but it’s actually a deliberate and significant aspect of the language. If you have () in assembly language, youll probably find C very natural and comfortable (although if you continue to focus too heavily on machine - level details, youll probably end up with unnecessarily non- portable programs). If you havent programmed in assembly language, you may be frustrated by C ’s lack of certain higher - level features. In either case, you should understand why C was de- signed this way: so that seemingly - simple constructions expressed in C would not expand to arbitrarily expensive ( in time or () ) machine language constructions when () . If you write a C program simply and succinctly, it is likely to result in a succinct, efficient machine language executable. If you find that the () resulting from a C program is not efficient, it’s probably because of something silly you did, not because of something the compiler did behind your back which you have no control over. In any case, there’s no point in complaining about C’s low - level flavor: C is what it is. If you find that the () resulting from a C program is not efficient.

A. efficient program
B. executable program
C. executable words
D. performable words

案例分析题C is sometimes referred to as a ’high -level () language’. Some people think that’s an insult, but it’s actually a deliberate and significant aspect of the language. If you have () in assembly language, youll probably find C very natural and comfortable (although if you continue to focus too heavily on machine - level details, youll probably end up with unnecessarily non- portable programs). If you havent programmed in assembly language, you may be frustrated by C ’s lack of certain higher - level features. In either case, you should understand why C was de- signed this way: so that seemingly - simple constructions expressed in C would not expand to arbitrarily expensive ( in time or () ) machine language constructions when () . If you write a C program simply and succinctly, it is likely to result in a succinct, efficient machine language executable. If you find that the () resulting from a C program is not efficient, it’s probably because of something silly you did, not because of something the compiler did behind your back which you have no control over. In any case, there’s no point in complaining about C’s low - level flavor: C is what it is. If you have () in assembly language.

A. done
B. taken
C. built
D. programmed

案例分析题C is sometimes referred to as a ’high -level () language’. Some people think that’s an insult, but it’s actually a deliberate and significant aspect of the language. If you have () in assembly language, youll probably find C very natural and comfortable (although if you continue to focus too heavily on machine - level details, youll probably end up with unnecessarily non- portable programs). If you havent programmed in assembly language, you may be frustrated by C ’s lack of certain higher - level features. In either case, you should understand why C was de- signed this way: so that seemingly - simple constructions expressed in C would not expand to arbitrarily expensive ( in time or () ) machine language constructions when () . If you write a C program simply and succinctly, it is likely to result in a succinct, efficient machine language executable. If you find that the () resulting from a C program is not efficient, it’s probably because of something silly you did, not because of something the compiler did behind your back which you have no control over. In any case, there’s no point in complaining about C’s low - level flavor: C is what it is. machine language constructions when ()

A. compiled
B. translated
C. accumulated
D. gathered

答案查题题库