题目内容
With a smirk, the________historian takes it as a professional obligation to parade human nature always as an object of________.
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
某酒厂是增值税一般纳税人，2005年10月发生以下经济业务： (1)向农民收购马铃薯30 000斤，每斤收购价为0.1元，高粱20 000斤，每斤收购价 0.6元，已验收入库。 (2)以薯类为原料自制酒精50 000斤，对外销售30 000斤，每斤不含税销售价为1元，另收取包装物押金500元。 (3)以自制酒精为原料加工成薯类白酒20 000斤，对外销售15 000斤，每斤不含税销售价为4元。 (4)以高梁为原料加工成粮食白酒10 000斤，全部对外销售，每斤不含税销售价为6元。 (5)该酒厂期初留抵的进项税额为5 000元。 要求：计算该酒厂2005年10月应该缴纳的消费税和增值税。
背景：某水利工程施工项目经过招标，建设单位选定A公司为中标单位。双方在施工合同中约定，A公司将设备安装、配套工程和桩基工程的施工分别分包给B.C.D三家专业公司，业主负责采购设备。 该工程在施工招标和合同履行过程中发生了下述事件： 事件1：施工招标过程中共有6家公司竞标，其中F公司的投标文件在招标文件要求提交投标文件的截止时间后半小时送达；G公司的投标文件未密封。 事件2：桩基工程施工完毕，已按国家有关规定和合同约定作了检测验收。监理工程师对其中5号桩的混凝土质量有怀疑，建议建设单位采用钻孔取样方法进一步检验。D公司不配合，总监理工程师要求A公司给予配合，A公司以桩基为D公司施工为由拒绝。 事件3：若桩钻孔取样检验合格，A公司要求该监理公司承担由此发生的全部费用，赔偿其窝工损失，并顺延所影响的工期。 事件4：建设单位采购的配套工程设备提前进场，A公司派人参加开箱清点，并向监理机构提交因此增加的保管费支付申请。 事件5：C公司在配套工程设备安装过程中发现附属工程设备材料库中部分配件丢失，要求建设单位重新采购供货。 事件2中A公司的做法妥当否为什么
Less than a year ago, a new generation of diet pills seemed to offer the long-sought answer to our chronic weight problems. Hundreds of thousands of pound-conscious Americans had discovered that a drug combination known as "fen-phen" could shut off voracious appetites like magic, and the FDA had just approved a new drug, Redux, that did the same with fewer side effects. Redux would attract hundreds of thousands of new pill poppers within a few months. But now the diet-drug revolution is facing a backlash. Some of the nation’’s largest HMOs, including Aetna U.S. Healthcare and Prudential Healthcare, have begun cutting back or eliminating reimbursement for both pills. Diet chains like Jenny Craig and Nutri-System are backing away from them too. Several states, meanwhile, have restricted the use of fen-phen, last week the Florida legislature banned new prescriptions entirely and called on doctors to wean current patients from the drug within 30 days; it also put a 90-day limit on Redux prescriptions. Even New Jersey doctor Sheldon Levine, who touted Redux last year on TV and in his book The Redux Revolution, has stopped giving it to all but his most obese patients. The reason for all the retrenchment: potentially lethal side effects. Over the summer, the FDA revealed that 82 patients had developed detects in their heart valves while on fen-phen, and that seven patients had come down with the same condition on Redux. As if that weren’t bad enough, physicians reported that a woman who had been taking fen-phen for less than a month died of primary pulmonary hypertension, a fatal lung condition already associated with Redux. And an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association last month confirmed earlier reports that both fen-phen and Redux can cause brain damage in lab animals. These findings led the New England Journal to publish an editorial admonishing doctors to prescribe the drugs only for patients with severe obesity. Meanwhile, FDA asked drug makers to put more explicit warnings on fen-phen and Redux labels. Since mid-July, prescriptions for fen-phen have dropped 56%, and those for Redux 36%, according to IMS America, a pharmaceutical-market research firm. All that really does, however, is to bring the numbers down to where they should have been all along. Manufacturers said from the start that their pills offered a short-term therapy for the obese, not for people looking to fit into a smaller bathing suit. FDA approved Redux with just such a caveat, and when limited to these patients, the drugs may still make sense-despite the risks-because morbid obesity carries its own dangers, including heart disease, diabetes and stroke. Too often, however, Redux and fen-phen were peddled’’ to all comers, almost like candy. The current backlash, says Levine, is a "roller coaster that never should have happened." The statement "diet-drug revolution is facing a backlash" (Para. 2) is supported by the following facts except _______.
Java Applet 中的事件处理机制与Java Application相同，采用【 】方式。
微信支付 
支付宝支付