题目内容
案情：甲公司于1995年获得国家专利局颁发的9518号实用新型专利权证书，后因未及时缴纳年费被国家专利局公告终止其专利权。1999年3月甲公司提出恢复其专利权的申请，国家知识产权局专利局于同年4月作出恢复其专利的决定。2000年3月，甲公司以专利侵权为由对乙公司提起民事诉讼。诉讼过程中，乙公司向专利复审委员会提出请求，要求宣告9518号专利权无效。2001年3月1日，专利复审委员会作出维持该专利有效的审查决定并通知乙公司。 问题： 如乙公司于2002年4月对恢复甲公司专利权的决定提起行政诉讼，是否超过行政诉讼的起诉期限？为什么？
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
某镇捕鱼专业户张三的1250公斤鱼要卖。因其妻子急病入院需要他照顾，正巧其邻居李四开着拖拉机去城里给别人拉一批货。张三便与李四约好，由李四顺便将鱼拉到鱼市代卖，鱼价随行就市，销完抽5%给李四作为报酬。李四拉着鱼驶往鱼市，离鱼市还有四十余里时，突然迎面开来一辆大货车将拖拉机撞坏。警察说责任不在李四，责令对方给李四修车。但由于天热，拖拉机一时半会儿修不好，正好李四的同学王五开着车路过出事地点。李四怕鱼要变臭，又同张三联系不上，于是就求王五将拖拉机上的鱼拉到鱼市，能卖几个钱就算几个钱。 王五将鱼拉到鱼市时，正好碰到其表兄张一。张一得知这种情况后，便让王五将鱼处理给自己，然后他给王五500元回扣。王五怕张三知道情况后责怪自己，几经周折，最后拨通了张三的电话，告诉张三说鱼已不新鲜，按市价不好卖，要卖只能降低。张三让王五看着办。于是王五便以低于市场 1／3的价格将鱼处理给张一，张一依约给了王五 500元。事后李四从王五交给他的卖鱼款中扣下了约定的5%的报酬后，将其余的钱交给了张三。张三一算，如此一来，他少得了1 000多元，损失太大了，于是提出：原来说按市价卖出，就比例抽头，现在卖价低于市场价1／3，李某不应再拿5%的报酬了，而且他认为李四应赔偿在代销中给他造成的损失。 王五和张一的行为是什么性质的行为
A. modified B. increased C. personalized D. browsed E. distributed F. released iPad applications enable the owner’s email accounts to be ______.
女性，23岁，既往无心脏病史，流产后一周，出现急性细菌性心内膜炎，伴二尖瓣关闭不全的症状及体征，血培养有粪链球菌生长，最适宜的治疗为
Science and Truth"FINAGLE" is not a word that most people associate with science. One reason is that the image of the scientist is of one who always collects data in an impartial (51) for truth. In any debate - over intelligence, schooling, energy-the (51) "science says" usually disarms opposition.But scientists have long acknowledged the existence of a "finagle factor"—a tendency by many scientists to give a helpful change to the data to (53) desired results. The latest of the finagle factor in action comes from Stephen Jay Gould, a Harvard biologist, (54) has examined the important 19th century work of Dr. Samuel George Morton. Morton was famous in his time (55) analysing the brain size of the skulls as a measure of intelligence. He concluded that whites had the (56) brains, that the brains of Indians and Blacks were smaller, and therefore, that whites constitute a superior race.Gould went back to Morton’s original data and concluded that the (57) were an example of the finagle at work. He found that Morton’s "discovery" was made by leaving out embarrassing data, using incorrect procedures, making simple arithmetical (58) (always in his favour) and changing his criteria-again, always in favour of his argument. Morton has been thoroughly discredited by now and scientists do not believe that brain size reflects (59) .But Gould went on to say Morton’s story is only an example of a common problem in (60) work. Some of the leading figures in science are believed to have (61) the finagle factor. Gould says that Isaac Newton fudged out to support at least three central statements that he could not prove. And so (62) Claudius Ptolemy, the Greek astronomer, whose master work, Almagest, summed up the case for a solar system that had the earth as its centre. Recent studies indicate that Ptolemy (63) faked some key data or resorted heavily to the finagle factor.All this is (64) because the finagle factor is still at work. For example, in the artificial sweetener controversy, for example, it is said that all the studies sponsored by the sugar industry find that the artificial sweetener is unsafe, while all the studies sponsored by the diet food industry find nothing (65) with it. 64（）
微信支付 
支付宝支付