In my opinion, there is only one legal handgun sport and that is aim practice. It is practiced at objects which are properly monitored and usually quite safe. Only certain handguns are true "sport- ing wen.pons’, seen as such by the sport’s lovers,On the other hand, shooting at tin cans and other small objects in one’s backyard is not and should not be considered h serious sport. When uncontrolled, it can be a yea7 dangerous practice. ’Some opponents of handgun control have stated that we are out to stop all hunting and that controlling the handgun would severely affect hunting. That is simply untrue, Handgun control would in no way limit the freedom of the true hunter. Few if any hunters consider the handgun an effective hunting weapon,There are a few hunters who do hunt with handguns,’but most states place restrictions (限制)on the type of guns that can be used in hunting, the reason being that killing of game should be done in as humane (人道的) a way as possible. Some small handguns are more likely to wound the animal rather than kill it at once. Only long guns, rifles (来福枪)and shotguns are effective arms for hunting.People must understand that handguns and hunters are separate matters. Because most of the hunters use a rifle or a shotgun’, there is no reason why their search for game and sport should be affected by handgun control. Mixing the anti-hunting matter with the handgun matter confuses the killing of animals with the killing of people. Most states limit the type of guns used for hunting because（）

A. they want to control the use of guns
B. some guns are not effective
C. animals are very strong
D. hunters should take a humane approach toward animals