题目内容
某实施监理的工程项目，在承重结构混凝土施工前，负责见证取样的监理工程师通知总监理工程师在施工现场进行了混凝土试块的见证取样，由承包单位项目经理对其送检样品进行加封后，由监理工程师送往试验室。试验室经试验后，出具了一式两份的试验报告，分别交由承包单位和建设单位保存，在见证取样的当月进度款支付申请中，承包单位将见证取样的试验费用加入工程进度款中，要求一并支付。 [问题]1.以上说法是否有不妥之处请指出来并说明应如何办理 2．为确保工程质量，建设部规定，在市政工程及房屋建筑工程项目中，对哪些实行见证取样 3．送往试验室的样品，应填写“送验单”，该“送验单”应有什么印章和谁的签字 4．实行见证取样，是否可以代替承包单位对材料、构配件进场时必须进行的自检
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
天天今年14岁，是某流浪儿童救助保护中心的儿童，于1年前来到该中心。天天的家在一个偏远的小山村，家里生活很困难。他说自己在村里的小学读到了二年级，因为自己学习成绩不好，再加上家境贫寒，就辍学了。阿丘是该中心的社会工作者，他通过对天天的观察发现，天天虽然说自己读到了二年级，但他认识的字特别少，拼音也不懂，不善于表达，平时也很少与其他人沟通。虽然天天与其他孩子相处得还好，但年纪尚小的他总是对别人有所防备，而且很有经济头脑，懂得算计。在课外的休息时间里，天天经常去附近的广场和公园捡矿泉水瓶子，去废品站换了钱后积攒起来。 在本案例中，阿丘应采取哪些介入策略
第二节 短文理解 1 阅读下面短文，从[A] (Right)、[B] (Wrong)、[C] (Doesn’t Say)三个判断中选择一个正确选项。 One day a farmer went out for a walk with his little son. The farmer put on a pair of wrong shoes, one with a thick sole (鞋底) and the other with a thin one. So as he began to walk, he felt very uncomfortable (不舒服). When he was just out of the house, he turned to his son and said, "Why should one of my legs be longer than the other today" The son looked at his father’s legs carefully as he was walking and then laughed," Oh, no, Daddy, your legs are all right. You have put on the wrong shoes." The farmer was very happy to hear that and said to himself, "What a clever son I have got!" Then he asked his son to go back and get the other pair of shoes for him. The farmer had only two pairs of shoes. When the son ran back to the house, he found that the other pair was also a pair of wrong shoes. He had to return to his father with nothing in his hands and said out of breath (气喘吁吁地), "It’s no use changing them, Daddy! The shoes at home were not a pair, either!" The son knew that his father had put on the wrong shoes.
Passage One With the possible exception of equal rights, perhaps the most controversial issue across the United States today is the death penalty. Many argue that it is an effective deterrent (威慑) to murder, while others maintain there is no convincing evidence that the death penalty reduces the number of murders. The principal argument advanced by those opposed to the death penalty, basically, is that it is cruel and inhuman punishment, that it is the mark of a brutal society, and finally that it is of questionable effectiveness as a deterrent to crime anyway. In our opinion, the death penalty is a necessary evil. Throughout recorded history there have always been those extreme individuals in every society who were capable of terribly violent crimes such as murder. But some are more extreme than others. For example, it is one thing to take the life of another in a fit of blind rage, but quite another to coldly plot and carry out the murder of one or more people in the style of a butcher. Thus, murder, like all other crimes, is a matter of relative degree. While it could be argued with some conviction that the criminal in the first instance should be merely isolated from society, such should not be the fate of the latter type murderer. The value of the death penalty as a deterrent to crime may be open to debate. But the overwhelming majority of citizens believe that the death penalty protects them. Their belief is reinforced by evidence which shows that the death penalty deters murder. For example, from 1954 to 1963, when the death penalty was consistently imposed in California, the murder rate remained between three and four murders for each 100 000 population. Since 1964 the death penalty has been imposed only once, and the murder rate has risen to 10.4 murders for each 100 000 population. The sharp climb in the state’s murder rate, which began when executions stopped, is no coincidence (巧合). It is convincing evidence that the death penalty does deter many murderers. If the bill reestablishing the death penalty is vetoed (否决), innocent people will be murdered—some whose lives may have been saved if the death penalty were in effect. This is literally a life or death matter. The lives of thousands of innocent people must be protected. In the passage the author is primarily concerned with ______ .
Passage Four In considering how the American family is changing, the starting point is the traditional family, a form which has developed over time on the basis of a number of assumptions. It is assumed that the family is heterosexual (异性的) institution, with prescriptions about how a man and a woman ought to be joined together and live together. The proper family form is assumed to be the nuclear family, that is, a family composed of a married man and woman and their children. It is assumed that the husband is the head of the family, with ultimate authority over wife and children, and that in their clearly separated roles the husband is the income-earner and the wife is the homemaker and provider of child care. It is assumed that the family lives by itself in its own house or residence. Observers of family life have suggested that numerous changes are taking place in this traditional American family form. Included are the following general observations about trends. More men and women seem to be living together before getting married. Women and men seem to be marrying at a later age. Married couples are having fewer children. Unmarried women appear to be having more children. Wives, even mothers with small children, are increasingly likely to be employed outside the home. Marriages are more likely to end with divorce. Single-parent families are more prevalent. Remarriage is likely to follow divorce rather than widowhood. Remarriage rates are declining, especially for women. Some trends, viewed in a long-range historical context, appear not to be trends at all. The age at which men and women normally marry is the same now as it was 100 years ago, though it has fluctuated (变动，波动); a short-range increase in the 1940s and 1950s due to widespread postponement of marriage in war time made it appear that a change had occurred. Other trends appear to be following established patterns rather than representing a sharp break with tradition. Divorce rates have been increasing and families have been having fewer children for well over a century. Single-parent families and stepfamilies were very common in the past, although the reason for them was different. Many marriages formerly are dissolved and followed by remarriage because of the death of a parent or partner. Today single parenthood and remarriage are more likely to be a response to divorce. Some social scientists see in these changes the breakdown of the family, to the detriment of the society. We take the position that family institutions and systems, like all human systems, are open, take many forms, and are constantly changing. Which of the following is observed as a trend in the traditional family form
微信支付 
支付宝支付