题目内容
重度肥胖症
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
右向左分流型先心病可有
Anderson’s new theory is controversial for asserting that Britain mighthave retained its North American empire had George III’s ministers proceededless precipitously. But as Anderson himself concedes to previous historians likeLine Henvel and Rhimes, there was no indication whether the persistence of imperial(5) authority would have made much difference for any of the parties involved. Atmost, these efforts would have endowed the British government with a"hollow" empire, wherein the exercise of effective authority would depend onthe consent of the colonists and their representatives. While the grip on theircolonies was questionable, the British had no option but to curtail their(10) authority, and at no point was the decision to do so more than a temporaryexpedient. Once the war in French Canada was resolved, England attempted toterminate the costly practices of Indian gift giving and to levy new taxation.Under such circumstances, moreover, Britain would have been able to offeronly limited protections to any of America’s other inhabitants, especially the(15) Indians whose lands in the Ohio Valley were already being encroached upon by asteady influx of European settlers. In a sense, the Seven Years’ War ended upconfirming the "American" character of Britain’s North American empire, anentity over which metropolitan authority had never been more than tenuous.Anderson’s hypothesis concerning French Canada is corroborated both by(20) the events of the American Revolution, and, less successfully, thecontemporaneous case of India, where the British successfully implemented thecolonial strategy Anderson recommends. As witnessed in Iroquoia, the MughalEmpire’s progressive collapse during the later 1740s and 1750s drew theBritish, who had been in India as traders since the early seventeenth century,(25) ever more deeply into politics on the subcontinent, first as the auxiliaries oflocal grandees and eventually as political actors in their own right. When theEast India Company governed in Bengal, it did so by virtue of cleverly acting asthe Mughal Emperor’s diwani (a Muslim office roughly analogous to a Europeantax farmer). Despite the temptation to act unilaterally, the company’s officials(30) were never ignorant of the fact that they owed their authority to the cooperationof local elites, who in turn accepted British rule assuming they could employ itto their own advantage.Anderson notes that although there were undoubtedly the vast differencesbetween them, India’s experience of British rule during the eighteenth century(35) points to the same devolution of imperial agency as in America. It is a patternJack P. Greene has identified as "negotiated authority", whereby the unlimitedpowers claimed by officials at the empire’s center were subject to constantrevision by indigenous brokers on the periphery. Despite the fact that theIndian colonial possessions were more enduring as a result, Anderson(40) nevertheless fails to successfully argue that the British could have retained otherparts of their empire for a more significant period through any of the means hehas suggested. According to Anderson’s view of colonial history, which of the following was true of the Mughal Empire’s collapse mentioned in lines 22-23（） Ⅰ. It paralleled and foreshadowed the subsequent collapse of the British empire several centuries later. Ⅱ. It was a significant factor in increasing the level of British political involvement in India. Ⅲ. It helped create the post of diwani, equivalent to tax-farmer, on the Indian subcontinent.
用于鉴别下丘脑或垂体性GHD的试验是
环形红斑多见于
微信支付 
支付宝支付