题目内容

[甲题] 四川泸州的黄永彬与妻子蒋伦芳结婚三十多年,有一养子。1994年起黄开始与张学英来往,1996年起二人公开同居,依靠黄的工资(退休金)及奖金生活,并曾经共同经营。但黄永彬与蒋伦芳并未离婚。2001年2月起,黄病重住院,张学英一直在医院照顾,法院认为其尽到了扶养义务。4月8日黄永彬立下遗嘱:“我决定,将依法所得的住房补贴金、公积金、抚恤金和泸州市江阳区的住房售价的一半(即4万元),以及手机一部留给我的朋友张学英一人所有。我去世后骨灰盒由张学英负责安葬。”4月20日,该遗嘱在纳溪区公证处得到公证。黄去世后,张根据遗嘱向蒋索要财产和骨灰盒,遭到蒋拒绝。张遂向纳溪区人民法院起诉,请求根据《继承法》的有关规定,判令被告蒋伦芳按照遗嘱履行,同时对遗产申请诉前保全。从5月17日起,法院经过4次开庭之后(其间曾一度中止,2001年7月13日,纳溪区司法局对该公证遗嘱的“遗赠抚恤金”部分予以撤销,依然维持了住房补贴和公积金中属于黄永彬部分的公证。此后审理恢复),于10月11日判决驳回原告张学英的诉讼请求。法院判决依据《民法通则》第7条民事活动应当尊重社会公德,不得损害社会公共利益的基本原则,认为黄永彬的遗嘱虽然是其真实意思的表示,形式上也合法,但遗嘱内容存在违法之处,且黄永彬与原告的非法同居关系违反了《婚姻法》的有关规定,黄永彬遗赠遗嘱是一种违反公序良俗和法律的行为,因此是无效的。本案的判决一方面获得了当地民众和一些学者的支持,另外很多法律界人士却认为这是道德与法和情与法的一次冲突,甚至认为有具体的实体法规则—《继承法》可依的情况下再依据法律原则,这样的判决是错误的。 对于此案你是怎么看的法律规则和法律原则之间的关系是怎样的其各自的功能是什么 [答题要求] 1.观点明确,论证充分,逻辑严谨,文字通顺; 2.不少于600字。

查看答案
更多问题

法律主体可以是会计主体,会计主体也一定是法律主体。( )

A. 对
B. 错

得知老师要来伦敦访问非常高兴;2. 介绍自己的学习和生活;3. 希望能带老师参观伦敦。

Conversation 2Questions 8 to 10 are based on the following conversation.[听力原文]8-10W: Hello, Air Traveler. What can I do for you, SirM: Can I book a ticket to New York for next Friday, pleaseW. Sure, but all the tickets of direct flights from Beijing are sold out. Would you mind a transfer ticketM: No. Where shall I go first, Hong Kong or TokyoW: Tokyo. You’ll wait there only for a couple of hours.M: Well, that doesn’t sound too bad. When can I get the ticketW: Any time. Would you like to have it delivered to youM: Yes, please.W: Ok. But you’ve got to pay in cash rather than use your credit card.M: No problem. Can I have a discountW: Yes, a ten percent discount.M: Fine, thanks. How will the man get the ticket()

A. He’ll pay by credit card.
B. It’ll be collected by himself.
C. He’ll pay by check.
D. It’ll be delivered to him.

Passage One Whenever I hear a weather report declaring it’s the hottest June 10 on record or whatever, I can’t take it too seriously, because "ever" really means "as long as the records go hack," which is only as far as the late 1800s. Scientists have other ways of measuring temperatures before that, though — not for individual dates, but they can tell the average temperature of a given year by such proxy measurements as growth marks in corals, deposits in ocean and lake sediments, and cores drilled into glacial ice. They can even use drawings of glaciers as there were hundreds of years ago compared with today. And in the most comprehensive compilation of such data to date, says a new report from the National Research Council, it looks pretty certain that the last few decades have been hotter than any comparable period in the last 400 years. That’s a blow to those who claim the current warm spell is just part of the natural up and down of average temperatures — a frequent assertion of the global-warming-doubters crowd. The report was triggered by doubts about past-climate claims made last year by climatologist Michael Mann, of the University of Virginia (he’s the creator of the "hockey stick" graph A1 Gore used in "An Inconvenient Truth" to dramatize the rise in carbon dioxide in recent years). Mann claimed that the recent warming was unprecedented in the past thousand years — that led Congress to order up an assessment by the prestigious Research Council. Their conclusion was that a thousand years was reasonable, but not overwhelmingly supported by the data. But the past 400 was — so resoundingly that it fully supports the claim that today’s temperatures are unnaturally warm, just as global warming theory has been predicting for a hundred years. And if there’s any doubt about whether these proxy measurements are really legitimate, the NRC scientists compared them with actual temperature data from the most recent century, when real thermometers were in widespread use. The match was more or less right on. In the past nearly two decades since TIME first put global warming on the cover, then, the argument against it has gone from "it isn’t happening" to "it’s happening, but it’s natural," to "it’s mostly natural" — and now, it seems, that assertion too is going to have to drop away. Indeed, Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, the New York Republican who chairs the House Science Committee and who asked for the report declared that it did nothing to support the notion of a controversy over global warming science — a controversy that opponents keep insisting is alive. Whether President Bush will finally take serious action to deal with the warming, however, is a much less settled question. What is the author’s attitude towards global warming theory

A. Negative.
B. Indifferent.
C. Favorable.
D. Neutral.

答案查题题库